Volume 1, Issue 6 pp. 530-535
Original Research

The Active Straight Leg Raise Test and Lumbar Spine Stability

Craig Liebenson DC

Craig Liebenson DC

L.A. Sports and Spine, Los Angeles, California, USA

Disclosure: nothing to disclose.Search for more papers by this author
Amy M. Karpowicz MSc

Amy M. Karpowicz MSc

Spine Biomechanics Labs, Faculty of Applied Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

Disclosure: nothing to disclose.Search for more papers by this author
Stephen H.M. Brown PhD

Stephen H.M. Brown PhD

Spine Biomechanics Labs, Faculty of Applied Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

Disclosure: nothing to disclose.Search for more papers by this author
Samuel J. Howarth MSc

Samuel J. Howarth MSc

Spine Biomechanics Labs, Faculty of Applied Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

Disclosure: nothing to disclose.Search for more papers by this author
Stuart M. McGill PhD

Corresponding Author

Stuart M. McGill PhD

Spine Biomechanics Labs, Department of Kinesiology, Faculty of Applied Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave. West, Waterloo, ONN2L 3G1, Canada

Disclosure: nothing to disclose.Address correspondence to: S.M.M.Search for more papers by this author
First published: 11 June 2009
Citations: 69
Disclosure Key can be found on the Table of Contents and at www.pmrjournal.org

Abstract

Objective

To determine the utility of the active straight leg raise (ASLR) test as a screen of lumbar spine stability and abdominal bracing (AB) ability.

Design

A biomechanical study of the ASLR test as a clinical evaluation of lumbar spine stability and AB.

Setting

Clinical research laboratory.

Participants

Fourteen participants who were currently asymptomatic for back pain and leg pain were evaluated.

Methods

Spine posture, muscle activation, and pressure distributions underneath the supine subject were determined.

Main Outcome Measurements

An estimation of lumbar spine stiffness, a direct correlate with spine stability, was obtained using an anatomically detailed spine model.

Results

AB during the ASLR reduced the center of pressure (CoP) movement on a strain-based pressure mat in lumbar rotation (P < .0125) as well as reducing directly measured lumbar rotation (P = .02). Active AB increased lumbar spine stiffness (P < .002). Regression analysis between stiffness and CoP movement suggested that different participants used different strategies to control torso motion.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that the ASLR has utility as a screen of lumbar spine stability and AB ability. The ASLR maneuver can assess control of lumbar rotational movements in the transverse plane. Finally, this study demonstrated that AB can measurably improve the rotational (transverse plane) stiffness of the lumbar spine.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.