Volume 28, Issue 1 pp. 34-46

Buyer perceptions of supply disruption risk: A behavioral view and empirical assessment

Scott C. Ellis

Scott C. Ellis

Clemson University, Department of Management, 123D Sirrine Hall, Clemson, SC 29634-1305, United States

Search for more papers by this author
Raymond M. Henry

Raymond M. Henry

Clemson University, Department of Management, 107 Sirrine Hall, Clemson, SC 29634-1305, United States

Search for more papers by this author
Jeff Shockley

Jeff Shockley

Radford University, Department of Management 130 Whitt Hall, Radford, VA 24142, United States

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 11 July 2009
Citations: 280
Corresponding author. Tel.: +1 864 656 6321; fax: +1 864 656 2015.

Abstract

As supply chains become more complex, firms face increasing risks of supply disruptions. The process through which buyers make decisions in the face of these risks, however, has not been explored. Despite research highlighting the importance of behavioral approaches to risk, there is limited research that applies these views of risk in the supply chain literature. This paper addresses this gap by drawing on behavioral risk theory to investigate the causal relationships amongst situation, representations of risk, and decision-making within the purchasing domain. We operationalize and explore the relationship between three representations of supply disruption risk: magnitude of supply disruption, probability of supply disruption, and overall supply disruption risk. Additionally, we draw on exchange theories to identify product and market factors that impact buyers’ perceptions of the probability and magnitude of supply disruption. Finally, we look at how representations of risk affect the decision to seek alternative sources of supply. We test our model using data collected from 223 purchasing managers and buyers of direct materials. Our results show that both the probability and the magnitude of supply disruption are important to buyers’ overall perceptions of supply disruption risk. We also find that product and market situational factors impact perceptions of risk, but they are best understood through their impact on perceptions of probability and magnitude. Finally, we find that decisions are based on assessments of overall risk. These findings provide insight into the decision-making process and show that all three representations of risk are necessary for fully understanding risky decision-making with respect to supply disruptions.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.