Understanding antecedents of new product development speed: A meta-analysis
Jiyao Chen
Center for Research in Technology & Innovation, Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, United States
Search for more papers by this authorFariborz Damanpour
Department of Management & Global Business, Rutgers Business School, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ 07102, United States
Search for more papers by this authorRichard R. Reilly
Howe School of Technology Management, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ 07030, United States
Search for more papers by this authorJiyao Chen
Center for Research in Technology & Innovation, Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, United States
Search for more papers by this authorFariborz Damanpour
Department of Management & Global Business, Rutgers Business School, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ 07102, United States
Search for more papers by this authorRichard R. Reilly
Howe School of Technology Management, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ 07030, United States
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
New product development (NPD) speed is a key component of time-based strategy, which has become increasingly important for managing innovation in a fast-changing business environment. This meta-analytic review assesses the generalizability of the relationships between NPD speed and 17 of its antecedents to provide a better understanding of the salient and cross-situationally consistent factors that affect NPD speed. We grouped the antecedents into four categories of strategy, project, process, and team, and found that process and team characteristics are more generalizable and cross-situationally consistent determinants of NPD speed than strategy and project characteristics. We also conducted subgroup analyses and found that research method variables, such as level of analysis, source of data, and measurement of speed, moderate the relationships between NPD speed and its antecedents. We apply the study's findings to assess several models of NPD speed, such as the balanced model of product development, the strategic orientation and organizational capability model, the compression vs. the experiential model, the centrifugal and centripetal model, and the product development cycle time model. We also discuss the implications of our findings for research and practice.
References14
- Adams-Bigelow, M., Griffin, A., 2005. Product development cycle time and success: new results from PDMA's comparative performance assessment study. Paper presented at the PDMA Research Forum 2005, San Diego, CA.
- P.S. Adler. Interdepartmental interdependence and coordination: the case of the design/manufacturing interface. Organization Science. 1995; 6(2): 147–167.
- A.E. *Akgün, G.S. Lynn. Antecedents and consequences of team stability on new product development performance. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management. 2002; 19(3/4): 263–286.
10.1016/S0923-4748(02)00021-8 Google Scholar
- A.E. *Akgün, G.S. Lynn. New product development team improvisation and speed-to-market: an extended model. European Journal of Innovation Management. 2002; 5(3): 117–129.
10.1108/14601060210436709 Google Scholar
- A.E. *Akgün, J. Byrne, H. Keskin, G.S. Lynn, S.Z. Imamoglu. Knowledge networks in new product development projects: a transactive memory perspective. Information & Management. 2005; 42(8): 1105–1120.
10.1016/j.im.2005.01.001 Google Scholar
- K. *Atuahene-Gima. The effects of centrifugal and centripetal forces on product development speed and quality: how does problem solving matter?. Academy of Management Journal. 2003; 46(3): 359–373.
10.5465/30040629 Google Scholar
- G. *Barczak, F. Sultan, E.J. Hultink. Determinants of IT usage and new product performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 2007; 24(6): 600–613.
10.1111/j.1540-5885.2007.00274.x Google Scholar
- G. *Barczak, E.J. Hultink, F. Sultan. Antecedents and consequences of information technology usage in NPD: a comparison of Dutch and U.S. companies. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 2008; 25(6): 620–631.
10.1111/j.1540-5885.2008.00326.x Google Scholar
- B.D. *Barnett, K.B. Clark. Technological newness: an empirical study in the process industries. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management. 1996; 13(3–4): 263–282.
10.1016/S0923-4748(96)01009-0 Google Scholar
- W. Biemans, A. Griffin, R. Moenaert. Twenty years of the Journal of Product Innovation Management: history, participants, and knowledge stock and flows. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 2007; 24(3): 193–213.
- Boston Consulting Group, 2006. The world's most innovative companies. Business Week Online, Special report—Innovation, April 24, 2006.
- S.L. Brown, K.M. Eisenhardt. Product development: past research, present findings, and future directions. The Academy of Management Review. 1995; 20(2): 343.
- L. *Bstieler. The moderating effect of environmental uncertainty on new product development and time efficiency. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 2005; 22(3): 267–284.
10.1111/j.0737-6782.2005.00122.x Google Scholar
- R.J. Bullock, D.J. Svyantek. Analyzing meta-analysis: potential problems, an unsuccessful replication, and evaluation criteria. Journal of Applied Psychology. 1985; 70: 108–115.
- T. Burns, G. Stalker. The Management of Innovation. London: Tavistock Institute. 1961.
- G.A. Boyne. ‘Public and private management: what's the difference?’. Journal of Management Studies. 2002; 39: 97–129.
- R. *Calantone, R. García, C. Dröge. The effects of environmental turbulence on new product development strategy planning. The Journal of Product Innovation Management. 2003; 20(2): 90–103.
10.1111/1540-5885.2002003 Google Scholar
- R.J. *Calantone, S.K. Vickery, C. Dröge. Business performance and strategic new product development activities: an empirical investigation. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 1995; 12(3): 214–223.
10.1111/1540-5885.1230214 Google Scholar
- R.J. *Calantone, C.A. Di Benedetto. Performance and time to market: accelerating cycle time with overlapping stages. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 2000; 47(2): 232–244.
10.1109/17.846790 Google Scholar
- J. *Callahan, B. Moretton. Reducing software product development time. International Journal of Project Management. 2001; 19(1): 59–70.
10.1016/S0263-7863(99)00045-9 Google Scholar
- C. Camisón-Zornoza, R. Lapiedra-Alcami, M. Segarra-Cipres, M. Boronat-Navarro. A meta-analysis of innovation and organizational size. Organization Studies. 2004; 25(3): 331–361.
- P. *Carbonell, A.I. Rodriguez. Designing teams for speedy product development: the moderating effect of technological complexity. Journal of Business Research2006
10.1016/j.jbusres.2005.08.002 Google Scholar
- P. *Carbonell, A.I. Rodriguez. The impact of market characteristics and innovation speed on perceptions of positional advantage and new product performance. International Journal of Research in Marketing. 2006; 23(1): 1–12.
10.1016/j.ijresmar.2006.01.002 Google Scholar
- Chen, J., 2007. Understanding speed in development of new products: a meta-analysis. Unpublished dissertation. Stevens Institute of Technology.
- J. Chen, R.R. Reilly, G.S. Lynn. The impacts of speed-to-market on new product success: the moderating effects of uncertainty. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 2005; 52(2): 199–212.
- J. Chen, R.R. Reilly, G.S. Lynn. Speed: too much of a good thing?. In T.R. Anderson, D.F. Kocaoglu, D.Z. Milosevic, C.M. Weber, eds.. Technology Management: A Unifying Discipline for Melting the Boundaries. Portland, OR: PICMET. 2005.
10.1109/PICMET.2005.1509733 Google Scholar
- G.M. *Chryssochoidis, V. Wong. Rolling out new products across country markets: an empirical study of causes of delays. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 1998; 15(1): 16–41.
10.1111/1540-5885.1510016 Google Scholar
- G.M. *Chryssochoidis, V. Wong. Customization of product technology and international new product success: mediating effects of new product development and rollout timeliness. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 2000; 17(4): 268–285.
10.1111/1540-5885.1740268 Google Scholar
- J. Cohen, P. Cohen. Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. second ed.. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.. 1983.
- R.G. *Cooper, E.J. Kleinschmidt. Determinants of timeliness in product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 1994; 11: 381–396.
10.1111/1540-5885.1150381 Google Scholar
- F. Damanpour. Organizational innovation: a meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy Management Journal. 1991; 34(3): 555–590.
- F. Damanpour. Organizational complexity and innovation: developing and testing multiple contingency models. Management Science. 1996; 42(5): 693–716.
10.1287/mnsc.42.5.693 Google Scholar
- F. Damanpour. Bureaucracy and innovation revisited: effects of contingency factors, industrial sectors, and innovation characteristics. Journal of High Technology Innovation Management. 1996; 7: 149–173.
10.1016/S1047-8310(96)90002-4 Google Scholar
- Damanpour, F., in press. An integration of research findings of effects of firm size and market competition on product and process innovation. British Journal of Management, doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2009.00628.x.
- A. Das, R.B. Handfield. A meta-analysis of doctoral dissertations in purchasing. Journal of Operations Management. 1997; 15(2): 101–121.
10.1016/S0272-6963(96)00101-5 Google Scholar
- M. *Dayan, A. Di Benedetto. Procedural and interactional justice perceptions and teamwork quality. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing. 2008; 23(8): 566–576.
- M. *Dayan, A. Di Benedetto, M. Colak. Managerial trust in new product development projects: its antecedents and consequences. R&D Management. 2009; 39(1): 21–37.
- C. *Dröge, J. Jayaram, S.K. Vickery. The ability to minimize the timing of new product development and introduction: an examination of antecedent factors in the North American automobile supplier industry. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 2000; 17(1): 24–40.
- V.G. *Duffy, G. Salvendy. Relating company performance to staff perceptions: the impact of concurrent engineering on time to market. International Journal of Production Research. 1999; 37(4): 821–834.
- B. Dumaine. How managers can succeed through SPEED. Fortune. 1989; 119(4): 54–59.
- K.M. *Eisenhardt, B.N. Tabrizi. Accelerating adaptive processes: product innovation in the global computer industry. Administrative Science Quarterly. 1995; 40: 84–110.
10.2307/2393701 Google Scholar
- P.A. Emmanuelides. Towards an integrative framework of performance in product development projects. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management. 1993; 10(4): 363–392.
10.1016/0923-4748(93)90029-I Google Scholar
- H. Ernst, T. Teichert. The R and D/marketing interface and single informant bias in NPD research: an illustration of a benchmarking case study. Technovation. 1998; 18(12): 721–739.
10.1016/S0166-4972(98)00069-8 Google Scholar
- E.E. *Fang. Customer participation and the trade-off between new product innovativeness and speed to market. Journal of Marketing. 2008; 72(4): 90–104.
- R. *Filippini, L. Salmaso, P. Tessarolo. Product development time performance: investigating the effect of interactions between drivers. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 2004; 21(3): 199–214.
10.1111/j.0737-6782.2004.00070.x Google Scholar
- N. *García, M.J. Sanzo, J.A. Trespalacios. New product internal performance and market performance: evidence from Spanish firms regarding the role of trust, interfunctional integration, and innovation type. Technovation. 2008; 28(11): 713–725.
10.1016/j.technovation.2008.01.001 Google Scholar
- D. Gerwin, N.J. Barrowman. An evaluation of research on integrated product development. Management Science. 2002; 48(7): 938–953.
- G.V. Glass. Integrating findings: the meta-analysis of research. Review of Research in Education. 1976; 5: 351–379.
- J.F.S. *Gomes, P.C.d. Weerd-Nederhof, A.W. Pearson, M.P. Cunha. Is more always better? An exploration of the differential effects of functional integration on performance in new product development. Technovation. 2003; 23(3): 185–191.
- A. *Griffin. Modeling and measuring product development cycle time across industries. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management. 1997; 14(1): 1–24.
10.1016/S0923-4748(97)00004-0 Google Scholar
- A. Griffin. Product development cycle time for business-to-business products. Industrial Marketing Management. 2002; 31(4): 291–304.
- A.K. Gupta, K. Brockhoff, U. Weisenfeld. Making trade-offs in the new product development process: a German/US comparison. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 1992; 9(1): 11–18.
- D.E. *Harter, M.S. Krishnan, S.A. Slaughter. Effects of process maturity on quality, cycle time, and effort in software product development. Management Science. 2000; 46(4): 451–466.
10.1287/mnsc.46.4.451.12056 Google Scholar
- J.L. *Hartley, B.J. Zirger, R.R. Kamath. Managing the buyer-supplier interface for on-time performance in product development. Journal of Operations Management. 1997; 15(1): 57–70.
10.1016/S0272-6963(96)00089-7 Google Scholar
- O. *Hauptman, K.K. Hirji. The influence of process concurrency on project outcomes in product development: an empirical study of cross-functional teams. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 1996; 43(2): 153–164.
10.1109/17.509981 Google Scholar
- L.V. Hedges, I. Olkin. Statistical Methods for Meta-analysis. Orlando: Academic Press. 1985.
- D.H. Henard, D.M. Szymanski. Why some new products are more successful than others. Journal of Marketing Research. 2001; 38(3): 362–373.
- M. *Hoegl, K. Weinkauf, H.G. Gemuenden. Interteam coordination, project commitment, and teamwork in multiteam R&D projects: a longitudinal study. Organization Science. 2004; 15(1): 38–55.
- P. *Hong, A.Y. Nahm, W.J. Doll. The role of project target clarity in an uncertain project environment. International Journal of Operations & Production Management. 2004; 24(12): 1269–1291.
- J.E. Hunter, F.L. Schmidt, G.B. Jackson. Meta-analysis: Cumulating Research Findings Across Studies. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.. 1982.
- J.E. Hunter, F.L. Schmidt. Methods of Meta-Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications. 1990.
- J.E. Hunter, F.L. Schmidt. Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings. second ed.. Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA. 2004.
10.4135/9781412985031 Google Scholar
- M. *Iansiti. Technology development and Integration: an empirical study of the interaction between applied science and product development. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 1995; 42(3): 259–269.
10.1109/17.403744 Google Scholar
- C.D. *Ittner, D.F. Larcker. Product development cycle time and organizational performance. Journal of Marketing Research. 1997; 34(1): 13–23.
10.1177/002224379703400102 Google Scholar
- R.T. *Keller. Cross-functional project groups in research and new product development: diversity, communications, job stress, and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal. 2001; 44(3): 547–555.
- R.T. *Keller. Transformational leadership, initiating structure, and substitutes for leadership: a longitudinal study of research and development project team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2006; 91(1): 202–210.
10.1037/0021-9010.91.1.202 Google Scholar
- E.H. Kessler, A.K. Chakrabarti. Innovation speed: a conceptual model of context, antecedents and outcomes. Academy Management Journal. 1996; 21(4): 1143–1191.
- E.H. *Kessler, P.E. BierlyIII. Is faster really better? An empirical test of the implication of innovation speed. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 2002; 49(1): 2–12.
10.1109/17.985742 Google Scholar
- *Kim, B., Kim, J., in press. Structural factors of NPD (new product development) team for manufacturability. International Journal of Project Management, doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.11.003.
- M. Ketokivi, J. Ali-Yrkkö. Unbundling R&D and manufacturing: postindustrial myth or economic reality?. Review of Policy Research. 2009; 26(1–2): 35–54.
10.1111/j.1541-1338.2008.00368.x Google Scholar
- R. Kohli, S. Devaraj. Measuring information technology payoff: a meta-analysis of structural variables in firm-level empirical research. Information systems research. 2003; 14(2): 127–145.
10.1287/isre.14.2.127.16019 Google Scholar
- D. Lambert, S.F. Slater. Perspective: first, fast, and on time: the path to success or is it?. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 1999; 16(5): 427–438.
- F. *Langerak, E.J. Hultink. The impact of new product development acceleration approaches on speed and profitability: lessons for pioneers and fast followers. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 2005; 52(1): 30–42.
10.1109/TEM.2004.839941 Google Scholar
- F. Langerak, E.J. Hultink. The impact of product innovativeness on the link between development speed and new product profitability. The Journal of Product Innovation Management. 2006; 23(3): 203.
- E.W. *Larson, D.H. Gobeli. Significance of project management structure on development success. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 1989; 36(2): 119–125.
10.1109/17.18828 Google Scholar
- P. Lawrence, J. Lorsch. Organization and Environment: Managing differentiation and Integration. Boston: Harvard University. 1967.
- M.W. *Lewis, M.A. Welsh, G.E. Dehler, S.G. Green. Product development tensions: exploring contrasting styles of project management. Academy of Management Journal. 2002; 45(3): 546–564.
- H. *Li, K. Atuahene-Gima. Marketing's influence and new product performance in Chinese firms. Journal of International Marketing. 1999; 7(1): 34–56.
- C. *Loch, A. DeMeyer, M. Pich. Managing the Unknown: A New Approach to Managing High Uncertainty and Risk in Projects. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.. 2006.
- B.A. *Lukas, A. Menon, S.J. Bell. Organizing for new product development speed and the implications for organizational stress. Industrial Marketing Management. 2002; 31(4): 349–355.
- B.A. *Lukas, A. Menon. New product quality: intended and unintended consequences of new product development speed. Journal of Business Research. 2004; 57(11): 1258–1264.
- G.S. *Lynn, R.B. Skov, K.D. Abel. Practices that support team learning and their impact on speed to market and new product success. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 1999; 16(5): 439–454.
- G.S. *Lynn, R.R. Reilly, A.E. Akgun. Knowledge management in new product teams: practice and outcomes. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 2000; 47(2): 221–231.
- Ma, J., Chen, J., Lynn, G., 2006. Virtual team, uncertainty and NPD performance. Paper presented at the International Association for Management of Technology, Beijing, PR China.
- E.F.I. *McDonough, G. Barczak. Speeding up new product development: the effects of leadership style and source of technology. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 1991; 8(3): 203–211.
10.1111/1540-5885.830203 Google Scholar
- E.F.I. *McDonough. Faster new product development: investigating the effects of technology and characteristics of the project leader and team. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 1993; 10(3): 241–250.
10.1111/1540-5885.1030241 Google Scholar
- A. Menon, J. Chowdhury, B.A. Lukas. Antecedents and outcomes of new product development speed: an interdisciplinary conceptual framework. Industrial Marketing Management. 2002; 31(4): 317–328.
- M.H. *Meyer, J.M. Utterback. Product development cycle time and commercial success. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 1995; 42(4): 297–304.
- I. Miles. Innovation in services. In J. Fagerberg, D.C. Mowery, R.R. Nelson, eds.. The Oxford Handbook of Innovations. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. 2005, 433–458.
- M.R. Millson, S.P. Raj, D. Wilemon. A survey of major approaches for accelerating new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 1992; 9(1): 53–69.
- M.M. Montoya-Weiss, R. Calantone. Determinants of new product performance: a review and meta-analysis. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 1994; 11(5): 397–417.
- C. *Moorman, A.S. Miner. The convergence of planning and execution: improvisation in new product development. Journal of Marketing. 1998; 62: 1–20.
10.1177/002224299806200301 Google Scholar
- A. Nair. Meta-analysis of the relationship between quality management practices and firm performance-implications for quality management theory development. Journal of Operations Management. 2006; 24(6): 948–975.
10.1016/j.jom.2005.11.005 Google Scholar
- E. *Naveh. The effect of integrated product development on efficiency and innovation. International Journal of Production Research. 2005; 43(13): 2789–2808.
10.1080/00207540500031873 Google Scholar
- E. *Naveh. Formality and discretion in successful R&D projects. Journal of Operations Management. 2007; 25(1): 110–125.
- A.L. Page, G.R. Schirr. Growth and development of a body of knowledge: 16 years of new product development research, 1989–2004. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 2008; 25(3): 233–248.
- M.H.-J. *Park, J.W. Lim, P.H. Birnbaum-More. The effect of multiknowledge individuals on performance in cross-functional new product development teams. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 2009; 26(1): 86–96.
- L.H. Pattikawa, E. Verwaal, H.R. Commandeur. Understanding new product project performance. European Journal of Marketing. 2006; 40(11/12): 1178.
10.1108/03090560610702768 Google Scholar
- M.E. Porter. Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York, NY: Free Press. 1985.
- M.A.M. *Primo, S.D. Amundson. An exploratory study of the effects of supplier relationships on new product development outcomes. Journal of Operations Management. 2002; 20(1): 33–52.
- R. *Rauniar, W. Doll, G. Rawski, P. Hong. Shared knowledge and product design glitches in integrated product development. International Journal of Production Economics. 2008; 114(2): 723–736.
10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.03.005 Google Scholar
- R. *Rauniar, W. Doll, G. Rawski, P. Hong. The role of heavyweight product manager in new product development. International Journal of Operations & Production Management. 2008; 28(2): 130–154.
10.1108/01443570810846874 Google Scholar
- C.A. *Rusinko. Exploring the use of design-manufacturing integration (DMI) to facilitate product development: a test of some practices. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 1999; 46(1): 56–71.
10.1109/17.740038 Google Scholar
- P.R. Sackett, M.M. Harris, J.M. Orr. On seeking moderator variables in the meta-analysis of correlation data: a Monte Carlo investigation of statistical power and resistance to type I error. Journal of Applied Psychology. 1986; 71(2): 302–310.
10.1037/0021-9010.71.2.302 Google Scholar
- A.M. *Sánchez, M.P. Pérez. Flexibility in new product development: a survey of practices and its relationship with the product's technological complexity. Technovation. 2003; 23(2): 139–145.
10.1016/S0166-4972(01)00096-7 Google Scholar
- S. *Sarin, C. McDermott. The effect of team leader characteristics on learning, knowledge application, and performance of cross-functional new product development teams. Decision Sciences. 2003; 34(4): 707–739.
- A.J. *Shenhar, D. Dvir, Y. Shulman. A two dimensional taxonomy of products and innovations. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management. 1995; 12: 175–200.
10.1016/0923-4748(96)80015-4 Google Scholar
- Shenhar, A.J., Dvir, D., Guth, W., Lechler, T., Panatakul, P., Poli, M., et al., 2005. Project strategy: the missing link. Paper presented at the Academy Of Management Annual Conference, Hawaii.
- W.A. Sheremata. Centrifugal and centripetal forces in radical new product development under time pressure. Academy of Management Journal. 2000; 25(2): 389–418.
- J.D. *Sherman, W.E. Souder, S.A. Jenssen. Differential effects of the primary forms of cross functional integration on product development cycle time. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 2000; 17(4): 257–267.
10.1111/1540-5885.1740257 Google Scholar
- P.G. Smith. From experience: reaping benefit from speed to market. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 1999; 16(3): 222–230.
- M. Song, K. Podoynitsyna, H. van der Bij, J.I.M. Halman. Success factors in new ventures: a meta-analysis. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 2008; 25(1): 7–27.
- W.E. *Souder, J.D. Sherman, R. Davies-Cooper. Environmental uncertainty, organizational integration, and new product development effectiveness: a test of contingency theory. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 1998; 15(5): 520–533.
10.1111/1540-5885.1560520 Google Scholar
- G.J. Stalk, T.M. Hout. Competing Against Time: How Time-based Competition is Reshaping Global Markets. New York, NY: The Free Press. 1990.
10.1080/08956308.1990.11670646 Google Scholar
- M. *Swink. Technological innovativeness as a moderator of new product design integration and top management support. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 2000; 17(3): 208–220.
10.1111/1540-5885.1730208 Google Scholar
- M. *Swink. Completing projects on-time: how project acceleration affects new product development. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management. 2003; 20(4): 319–344.
10.1016/j.jengtecman.2003.08.002 Google Scholar
- M. Swink, S. Talluri, T. Pandejpong. Faster, better, cheaper: a study of NPD project efficiency and performance tradeoffs. Journal of Operations Management. 2006; 24(5): 542–562.
- M. *Swink, M. Song. Effects of marketing-manufacturing integration on new product development time and competitive advantage. Journal of Operations Management. 2007; 25(1): 203–217.
10.1016/j.jom.2006.03.001 Google Scholar
- A. *Syamil, W.J. Doll, C.H. Apigian. Process performance in product development: measure and impacts. European Journal of Innovation Management. 2004; 7(3): 205–217.
10.1108/14601060410549892 Google Scholar
- M.V. Tatikonda, S.R. Rosenthal. Successful execution of product development projects: balancing firmness and flexibility in the innovation process. Journal of Operations Management. 2000; 18(4): 401–425.
- M.V. *Tatikonda, M.M. Montoya-Weiss. Integrating operations and marketing perspectives of product innovation: the influence of organizational process factors and capabilities on development performance. Management Science. 2001; 47(1): 151–172.
10.1287/mnsc.47.1.151.10669 Google Scholar
- G.J. Tellis, P.N. Golder. Will & Vision: How Latecomers Grow to Dominate Markets, McGraw-Hill. 2001.
- C. *Terwiesch, C.H. Loch. Measuring the effectiveness of overlapping development activities. Management Science. 1999; 45(4): 455–465.
10.1287/mnsc.45.4.455 Google Scholar
- P. *Tessarolo. Is integration enough for fast product development? An empirical investigation of the contextual effects of product vision. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 2007; 24(1): 69–82.
10.1111/j.1540-5885.2006.00233.x Google Scholar
- J.D. Thompson. Organization in Action. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. 1967.
- D. Tranfield, D. Denyer, P. Smart. Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management. 2003; 14(3): 207–222.
- L.C. Troy, T. Hirunyawipada, A.K. Paswan. Cross-functional integration and new product success: an empirical investigation of the findings. Journal of Marketing. 2008; 72(6): 132–146.
- Y.H. *Tseng. Examining the relationship between the design-manufacturing cooperation and new product development time performance: the moderating role of technological innovativeness. Journal of American Academy of Business. 2006; 9(1): 1–7.
- Vincent, L.H., Bharadwaj, S.G., Challagalla, C.N., 2003. Meta-analytic review of antecedents and consequences of innovation. Paper presented at the American Marketing Association.
- E. von Hippel. The Sources of Innovation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, Inc.. 1988.
- J.A.I. Wagner, R.Z. Gooding. Effects of societal trends on participation research. Administrative Science Quarterly. 1987; 32(2): 241–262.
- S.C. Wheelwright, K.B. Clark. Revolutionizing Product Development: Quantum Leaps in Speed, Efficiency Quality. New York: Free Press. 1992.
- G.P. White. A meta-analysis model of manufacturing capabilities. Journal of Operations Management. 1996; 14(4): 315–331.
10.1016/S0272-6963(96)00096-4 Google Scholar
- B.J. Zirger, J.L. Hartley. A conceptual model of product development cycle time. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management. 1994; 11(3–4): 229–251.
- B.J. *Zirger, J.L. Hartley. The effect of acceleration techniques on product development time. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 1996; 43(2): 143–152.
10.1109/17.509980 Google Scholar