Volume 43, Issue 1 1 pp. 230-241
Original Scientific Report

Enhanced Recovery in Liver Transplantation: A Feasibility Study

Raffaele Brustia

Raffaele Brustia

Liver Transplantation Surgical Programme and Hepatobiliary Surgical Department, Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 47-83 Boulevard de l’Hôpital, Paris, France

Sorbonne Universités, Paris, France

Search for more papers by this author
Antoine Monsel

Antoine Monsel

Multidisciplinary Intensive Care Unit, Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France

Sorbonne Universités, Paris, France

Search for more papers by this author
Filomena Conti

Filomena Conti

Liver Transplantation and Hepatology Department, Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 47-83 Boulevard de l’Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France

Sorbonne Universités, Paris, France

Search for more papers by this author
Eric Savier

Eric Savier

Liver Transplantation Surgical Programme and Hepatobiliary Surgical Department, Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 47-83 Boulevard de l’Hôpital, Paris, France

Search for more papers by this author
Geraldine Rousseau

Geraldine Rousseau

Liver Transplantation Surgical Programme and Hepatobiliary Surgical Department, Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 47-83 Boulevard de l’Hôpital, Paris, France

Sorbonne Universités, Paris, France

Search for more papers by this author
Fabiano Perdigao

Fabiano Perdigao

Liver Transplantation Surgical Programme and Hepatobiliary Surgical Department, Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 47-83 Boulevard de l’Hôpital, Paris, France

Search for more papers by this author
Denis Bernard

Denis Bernard

Multidisciplinary Intensive Care Unit, Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France

Search for more papers by this author
Daniel Eyraud

Daniel Eyraud

Multidisciplinary Intensive Care Unit, Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France

Search for more papers by this author
Yann Loncar

Yann Loncar

Multidisciplinary Intensive Care Unit, Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France

Search for more papers by this author
Olivier Langeron

Olivier Langeron

Multidisciplinary Intensive Care Unit, Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France

Sorbonne Universités, Paris, France

Search for more papers by this author
Olivier Scatton

Corresponding Author

Olivier Scatton

Liver Transplantation Surgical Programme and Hepatobiliary Surgical Department, Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 47-83 Boulevard de l’Hôpital, Paris, France

Sorbonne Universités, Paris, France

Tel.: + 33 (1) 42.17.56.52, [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
First published: 09 August 2018
Citations: 49

Electronic supplementary material: The online version of this article (https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4747-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Abstract

Background

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programmes after surgery are effective in reducing length of stay, functional recovery and complication rates in liver surgery (LS) with the indirect advantage of reducing hospitalisation costs. Preoperative comorbidities, challenging surgical procedures and complex post-operative management are the points that liver transplantation (LT) shares with LS. Nevertheless, there is little evidence regarding the feasibility and safety of ERAS programmes in LT.

Methods

We designed a pilot, small-scale, feasibility study to assess the impact on hospital stay, protocol compliance and safety of an ERAS programme tailored for LT. The ERAS arm was compared with a 1:2 match paired control arm with similar characteristics. All patients with MELD <25 were included. A dedicated LT-tailored protocol was derived from publications on ERAS liver surgery.

Results

Ten patients were included in the Fast-Trans arm. It was observed a 47% reduction of the total LOS, as compared to the control arm: 9.5 (9.0–10.5) days versus 18.0 (14.3–24.3) days, respectively, p <0.001. The protocol achieved 72.9% compliance. No differences were observed in terms of post-operative complications or readmission rates after discharge between the two arms. Overall, it was observed a reduction of length of stay in ICU and surgical ward in the Fast-Trans arm compared with the control arm.

Conclusion

Considered the main points in common between LS and LT, this small-scale study suggests that the application of an ERAS programme tailored to the LT setting is feasible. Further testing will be appropriate to generalise these findings.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.