Volume 40, Issue 5 1 pp. 1053-1059
Original Scientific Report

Economic Valuation of the Global Burden of Cleft Disease Averted by a Large Cleft Charity

Dan Poenaru

Dan Poenaru

MyungSung Christian Medical Center, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia and Montreal Children’s Hospital, Montreal, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Dan Lin

Dan Lin

Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Scott Corlew

Corresponding Author

Scott Corlew

2111 Riverview Drive, 37129 Murfreesboro, TN, USA

Tel.: 615-849-9025, [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
First published: 15 December 2015
Citations: 41

Abstract

Background

This study attempts to quantify the burden of disease averted through the global surgical work of a large cleft charity, and estimate the economic impact of this effort over a 10-year period.

Methods

Anonymized data of all primary cleft lip and cleft palate procedures in the Smile Train database were analyzed and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) calculated using country-specific life expectancy tables, established disability weights, and estimated success of surgery and residual disability probabilities; multiple age weighting and discounting permutations were included. Averted DALYs were calculated and gross national income (GNI) per capita was then multiplied by averted DALYs to estimate economic gains.

Results

548,147 primary cleft procedures were performed in 83 countries between 2001 and 2011. 547,769 records contained complete data available for the study; 58 % were cleft lip and 42 % cleft palate. Averted DALYs ranged between 1.46 and 4.95 M. The mean economic impact ranged between USD 5510 and 50,634 per person. This corresponded to a global economic impact of between USD 3.0B and 27.7B USD, depending on the DALY and GNI values used. The estimated cost of providing these procedures based on an average reimbursement rate was USD 197M (0.7–6.6 % of the estimated impact).

Conclusions

The immense economic gain realized through procedures focused on a small proportion of the surgical burden of disease highlights the importance and cost-effectiveness of surgical treatment globally. This methodology can be applied to evaluate interventions for other conditions, and for evidence-based health care resource allocation.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.