Volume 37, Issue 4 1 pp. 737-745
Article

Mosquito Net Mesh for Abdominal Wall Hernioplasty: A Comparison of Material Characteristics with Commercial Prosthetics

David L. Sanders

Corresponding Author

David L. Sanders

Department of Surgery, Royal Cornwall Hospital, TR1 3LJ Truro, UK

[email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Andrew N. Kingsnorth

Andrew N. Kingsnorth

“Operation Hernia”, Department of Surgery, Derriford Hospital, PL6 8DH Plymouth, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Brian M. Stephenson

Brian M. Stephenson

Department of Surgery, Royal Gwent Hospital, NP20 2UB Newport, South Wales, UK

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 24 January 2013
Citations: 34

Abstract

Background

The use of sterilized mosquito net as a cheaper alternative to commercial mesh used in hernia repair has previously been published. However, as no standards with regard to the material have been documented, we aimed to define the characteristics of a commonly available and low-cost mosquito net, which has already been shown to be clinically efficacious in groin hernia repair. We compared its characteristics to other commercially available meshes, in keeping with the well-established FDA and MHRA regulatory processes.

Methods

The macromolecular structure of the mosquito net was determined by vibrational spectroscopy. The ultrastructure of the meshes was examined with scanning electron microscopy, and uniaxial and burst tensile strength testing was performed. The following parameters were assessed: polymer type, filament characteristics, pore size, weight, linear density, elasticity, and tensile strength.

Results

The mosquito net was a polyethylene homopolymer, knitted from monofilament fibers with a mean filament diameter of 109.7 μm and a mean mesh thickness of 480 μm. The mean pore maximum diameter was 1.9 mm, with 91.2 % porosity, 53.7 g/m2 mean mesh weight, and a linear mass density of 152 denier. This was comparable to the “large pore” (class I) commercial meshes. The bursting force for polyethylene mosquito net was greater than for UltraPro and Vypro (43.0 vs. 35.5 and 27.2 N/cm, respectively), and the mosquito net exhibited less anisotropy compared to the commercial meshes.

Conclusions

The material and mechanical properties of the polyethylene mosquito net are substantially equivalent to those of commonly used lightweight commercial meshes.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.