Volume 16, Issue 1 pp. 77-89
Research Report
Free Access

Antipsychotic augmentation vs. monotherapy in schizophrenia: systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis

Britta Galling

Britta Galling

Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany

Zucker Hillside Hospital, Psychiatry Research, Northwell Health, Glen Oaks, NY, USA

Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Hempstead, NY, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Alexandra Roldán

Alexandra Roldán

Department of Psychiatry, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica Sant Pau, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
Katsuhiko Hagi

Katsuhiko Hagi

Zucker Hillside Hospital, Psychiatry Research, Northwell Health, Glen Oaks, NY, USA

Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Tokyo, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Liz Rietschel

Liz Rietschel

University Hospital of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
Frozan Walyzada

Frozan Walyzada

Zucker Hillside Hospital, Psychiatry Research, Northwell Health, Glen Oaks, NY, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Wei Zheng

Wei Zheng

Guangzhou Brain Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China

Search for more papers by this author
Xiao-Lan Cao

Xiao-Lan Cao

Department of Psychiatry, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China

Search for more papers by this author
Yu-Tao Xiang

Yu-Tao Xiang

Unit of Psychiatry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Macao, Taipa, Macao, SAR, China

Search for more papers by this author
Mathias Zink

Mathias Zink

Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
John M. Kane

John M. Kane

Zucker Hillside Hospital, Psychiatry Research, Northwell Health, Glen Oaks, NY, USA

Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Hempstead, NY, USA

Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, USA

Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Jimmi Nielsen

Jimmi Nielsen

Department of Psychiatry, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark

Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark

Search for more papers by this author
Stefan Leucht

Stefan Leucht

Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Christoph U. Correll

Christoph U. Correll

Zucker Hillside Hospital, Psychiatry Research, Northwell Health, Glen Oaks, NY, USA

Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Hempstead, NY, USA

Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, USA

Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 26 January 2017
Citations: 186

Abstract

Antipsychotic polypharmacy in schizophrenia is much debated, since it is common and costly with unclear evidence for its efficacy and safety. We conducted a systematic literature search and a random effects meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing augmentation with a second antipsychotic vs. continued antipsychotic monotherapy in schizophrenia. Co-primary outcomes were total symptom reduction and study-defined response. Antipsychotic augmentation was superior to monotherapy regarding total symptom reduction (16 studies, N=694, standardized mean difference, SMD=–0.53, 95% CI: −0.87 to −0.19, p=0.002). However, superiority was only apparent in open-label and low-quality trials (both p<0.001), but not in double-blind and high-quality ones (p=0.120 and 0.226, respectively). Study-defined response was similar between antipsychotic augmentation and monotherapy (14 studies, N=938, risk ratio = 1.19, 95% CI: 0.99 to 1.42, p=0.061), being clearly non-significant in double-blind and high-quality studies (both p=0.990). Findings were replicated in clozapine and non-clozapine augmentation studies. No differences emerged regarding all-cause/specific-cause discontinuation, global clinical impression, as well as positive, general and depressive symptoms. Negative symptoms improved more with augmentation treatment (18 studies, N=931, SMD=–0.38, 95% CI: −0.63 to −0.13, p<0.003), but only in studies augmenting with aripiprazole (8 studies, N=532, SMD=–0.41, 95% CI: −0.79 to −0.03, p=0.036). Few adverse effect differences emerged: D2 antagonist augmentation was associated with less insomnia (p=0.028), but more prolactin elevation (p=0.015), while aripiprazole augmentation was associated with reduced prolactin levels (p<0.001) and body weight (p=0.030). These data suggest that the common practice of antipsychotic augmentation in schizophrenia lacks double-blind/high-quality evidence for efficacy, except for negative symptom reduction with aripiprazole augmentation.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.