Examining the effects of combined gait retraining and video self-modeling on habitual runners experiencing knee pain: A pilot study
Corresponding Author
Ceri Elen Diss
Department of Life Sciences, University of Roehampton, London, UK
Correspondence
Ceri Diss, Department of Life Sciences, University of Roehampton, London, UK.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorSimon Doyle
Department of Life Sciences, University of Roehampton, London, UK
Search for more papers by this authorIsabel S. Moore
Cardiff School of Sport and Health Sciences, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, UK
Search for more papers by this authorStephen D. Mellalieu
Cardiff School of Sport and Health Sciences, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, UK
Search for more papers by this authorAdam M. Bruton
Department of Life Sciences, University of Roehampton, London, UK
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Ceri Elen Diss
Department of Life Sciences, University of Roehampton, London, UK
Correspondence
Ceri Diss, Department of Life Sciences, University of Roehampton, London, UK.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorSimon Doyle
Department of Life Sciences, University of Roehampton, London, UK
Search for more papers by this authorIsabel S. Moore
Cardiff School of Sport and Health Sciences, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, UK
Search for more papers by this authorStephen D. Mellalieu
Cardiff School of Sport and Health Sciences, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, UK
Search for more papers by this authorAdam M. Bruton
Department of Life Sciences, University of Roehampton, London, UK
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
This multidisciplinary study aimed to reduce stride length (SL) by 2%-4% for two runners (P1 and P2) experiencing chronic knee pain using a biomechanical gait retraining and video self-modeling intervention. The pre- and post-test design examined the acute changes in biomechanical and psychological factors following a 4-week intervention, which involved four gait retraining sessions and four gait consolidation sessions. Participants watched self-modeling videos twice daily in between sessions. P1 met the required SL reduction (2.61%), resulting in a 9% decrease in peak vertical ground reaction force combined with a 72% reduction in peak knee abduction moment. P1 demonstrated large positive effects for four performance- and two injury-based psychological variables (ES = 0.85-4.30) and a large negative effect for one injury-based psychological variable (ES = 1.50). P2 did not meet the required reduction in SL (1.3%); the response was an increase in vertical ground reaction forces (0.90%). P2 demonstrated large positive effects for three performance- and two injury-based psychological variables (ES = 3.00-4.28) and a large negative for one performance-based psychological variable (ES = 3.65). The consideration for individualized responses to interventions targeting a change in gait is warranted, as applying a “one-size-fits-all” approach may be detrimental to reducing injury pain.
REFERENCES
- 1 ASICS. Reasons to run survey. [cited 2016 17 August]. Available from: http://www.everythingaboutrunning.asics.eu/
- 2Willson J, Sharpee R, Meardon S, Kernozek T. Effects of step length on patellofemoral joint stress in female runners with and without patellofemoral pain. Clinical Biomech. 2014; 29(3): 243-247.
10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2013.12.016 Google Scholar
- 3Myer GD, Ford KR, Foss KD, et al. The incidence and potential pathomechanics of patellofemoral pain in female athletes. Clinical Biomech. 2010; 25(7): 700-707.
- 4Chumanov E, Wille C, Michalski M, Heiderscheit B. Changes in muscle activation patterns when running step rate is increased. Gait Posture. 2012; 36(2): 231-235.
- 5Willy R, Buchenic L, Rogacki K, Ackerman J, Schmidt A, Willson J. In field gait retraining and mobile monitoring to address running biomechanics associated with tibial stress fracture. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2016; 26(2): 197-205.
- 6Lenhart RL, Thelen DG, Wille CM, Chumanov ES, Heiderscheit BC. Increasing running step rate reduces patellofemoral joint forces. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014; 46(3): 557-564.
- 7Heiderscheit BC, Chumanov ES, Michalski MP, Wille CM, Ryan MB. Effects of step rate manipulation on joint mechanics during running. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011; 43(2): 296-302.
- 8Allen D, Heisler H, Mooney J, Kring R. The effect of step rate manipulation on foot strike pattern of long distance runners. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2016; 11(1): 54-63.
- 9Kulmala J, Avela J, Pasanen K, Parkkar J. Forefoot strikers exhibit lower running-induced knee loading than rearfoot strikers. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013; 45(12): 2306-2313.
- 10Neal BS, Barton CJ, Gallie R, O'Halloran P, Morrisey D. Runners with patellofemoral pain have altered biomechanics which targeted interventions can modify: a systematic review. Gait Posture. 2016; 45: 69-82.
- 11Barton CJ, Bonanno DR, Carr J, et al. Running retraining to treat lower limb injuries: a mixed-methods study of current evidence synthesized with expert opinion. Br J Sports Med. 2016; 50: 513-526.
- 12Willy R, Scholz J, Davis I. Mirror gait retraining for the treatment of patellofemoral pain in female runners. Clinical Biomech. 2012; 27(10): 1045-1051.
- 13Ste-Marie DM, Law B, Rymal AM, Jenny O, Hall C, McCullagh P. Observation interventions for motor skill learning and performance: an applied model for the use of observation. Int Review Sport Exerc Psych. 2012; 5(2): 145-176.
10.1080/1750984X.2012.665076 Google Scholar
- 14Ashford D, Bennett SJ, Davids K. Observational modeling effects for movement dynamics and movement outcome measures across differing task constraints: a meta-analysis. J Motor Beh. 2006; 38(3): 185-205.
10.3200/JMBR.38.3.185-205 Google Scholar
- 15Brewer BW. Psychology of sport injury rehabilitation. In: G Tenenbaum, R Eklund, eds. Handbook of Sport Psychology. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons; 2007: 404-424.
- 16Becker J, Schwartz C, Saris-Baglama RN, Kosinski M, Bjorner JB. Using Item Response Theory (IRT) for developing and evaluating the Pain Impact Questionnaire (PIQ-6). Pain Med. 2007; 8: 129-144.
- 17Davis R, Ounpuu S, Tyburski D, Gage J. A gait analysis data collection and reduction technique. Hum Mvt Sci. 1991; 10: 575-587.
- 18Bruton AM, Mellalieu SD, Shearer DA. Validation of a single-item stem for collective efficacy measurement in sports teams. Int J Sport Exerc Psych. 2016; 14(4): 383-401.
10.1080/1612197X.2015.1054853 Google Scholar
- 19Luszczynska A, Mazurkiewicz M, Ziegelmann JP, Schwarzer R. Recovery self-efficacy and intention as predictors of running or jogging behavior: a cross-lagged panel analysis over a two-year period. Psych Sport Exerc. 2007; 8(2): 247-260.
- 20Mallett C, Kawabata M, Newcombe P, Otero-Forero A, Jackson S. Sport motivation scale-6 (SMS-6): a revised six-factor sport motivation scale. Psych Sport Exerc. 2007; 8(5): 600-614.
10.1016/j.psychsport.2006.12.005 Google Scholar
- 21Smith RE, Smoll FL, Cumming SP, Grossbard JR. Measurement of multidimensional sport performance anxiety in children and adults: the Sport Anxiety Scale-2. J Sport Exerc Psych. 2006; 28(4): 479-501.
- 22Thompson ER. Development and validation of an internationally reliable short-form of the positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS). J Cross-Cultural Psych. 2007; 2007(38): 227-242.
- 23Schwarzer R, Jerusalem M. Generalized self-efficacy scale. In: J Weinman, S Wright, M Johnston, eds. Measures in Health Psychology: A User's Portfolio. Causal and Control Beliefs. Windsor, England: NFER-NELSON; 1995: 35-37.
- 24Pataky T. One-dimensional statistical parametric mapping in Python. Comput Method Biomec. 2012; 15(3): 295-301.
10.1080/10255842.2010.527837 Google Scholar
- 25Lieberman D, Warrener A, Wang J, Castillo E. Effects of stride frequency and foot position at landing on braking force, hip torque, impact peak force and the metabolic cost of running in humans. J Exp Biol. 2015; 218(21): 3406-3414.
- 26Santos-Concejero J, Tam N, Coetzee DR, Oliván J, Noakes TD, Tucker R. Are gait characteristics and ground reaction forces related to energy cost of running in elite Kenyan runners? J Sport Sci. 2016; 35(6): 1-8.
- 27Kyröläinen H, Komi P, Belli A. Changes in muscle activity patterns and kinetics with increasing running speed. J Str Cond Res. 1999; 13(4): 400-406.
- 28Perl D, Daoud A, Lieberman D. Effects of footwear and strike type on running economy. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012; 44: 1335-1343.
- 29Moore IS, Jones AM, Dixon SJ. Mechanisms for improved running economy in beginner runners. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012; 44(9): 1756-1763.
- 30Connick M, Li F. Changes in timing of muscle contractions and running economy with altered stride pattern during running. Gait Posture. 2014; 39: 634-637.
- 31Malfait B, Dingenen B, Smeets A, et al. Knee and hip joint kinematics predict quadriceps and hamstrings neuromuscular activation patterns in drop jump landings. PLoS ONE. 2016; 11(4): 1-18.
- 32Luedke L, Heiderscheit B, Williams D, Rauh M. Association of isometric strength of hip and knee muscles with injury risk in high school cross country runners. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2015; 10(6): 868-876.
- 33Noehren B, Scholz J, Davis I. The effect of real-time gait retraining on hip kinematics, pain and function in subjects with patellofemoral pain syndrome. Br J Sports Med. 2010; 45(9): 691-696.
- 34Magill RA, Anderson DI. Motor Learning and Control: Concepts and Applications (Vol. 11). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2007.
- 35Wulf G, Lewthwaite R. Optimizing performance through intrinsic motivation and attention for learning: the optimal theory of motor learning. Psychon Bull Rev. 2016; 23(5): 1382-1414.
- 36Luszczynska A, Scholz U, Schwarzer R. The general self-efficacy scale: multicultural validation studies. The J of Psych. 2005; 139(5): 439-457.
- 37McDonald SA, Hardy CJ. Affective response patterns of the injured athlete: an exploratory analysis. The Sport Psych. 1990; 4(3): 261-274.
- 38Bandura A. The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. J Social Clinical Psych. 1986; 4(3): 359-373.
- 39Wadey R, Evans L, Evans K, Mitchell I. Perceived benefits following sport injury: a qualitative examination of their antecedents and underlying mechanisms. J App Sport Psych. 2011; 23(2): 142-158.
10.1080/10413200.2010.543119 Google Scholar