Volume 3, Issue 1 pp. 34-45
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Effect of home-based resistance training performed with or without a high-speed component in adults with severe obesity

Samuel T. Orange

Samuel T. Orange

Department of Sport, Health and Exercise Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Hull, Hull, UK

Department of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Phil Marshall

Phil Marshall

Department of Sport, Health and Exercise Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Hull, Hull, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Leigh A. Madden

Leigh A. Madden

Department of Biomedical Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Hull, Hull, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Rebecca V. Vince

Corresponding Author

Rebecca V. Vince

Department of Sport, Health and Exercise Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Hull, Hull, UK

Correspondence

Rebecca V. Vince, Sport, Health and Exercise Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RX, UK.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 12 September 2019
Citations: 5
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03900962.

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to: (a) evaluate the effects of walking and home-based resistance training on function, strength, power, anthropometry, and quality of life (QoL) in adults with severe obesity, and (b) assess whether performing resistance exercises with maximal concentric velocity provides additional benefits compared with traditional slow-speed resistance training. Adults with a body mass index of ≥ 40 kg/m2 were randomized to slow-speed strength training (ST; n = 19) or high-speed power training (PT; n = 19). Both groups completed a walking intervention and home-based resistance training (2× per week for 6 months). The PT group performed resistance exercises with maximal intended concentric velocity, whereas the ST group maintained a slow (2-seconds) concentric velocity. At 6 months, weight loss was ~3 kg in both groups. Both groups significantly improved function (gz = 1.04-1.93), strength (gz = 0.65-1.77), power (gz = 0.66-0.85), contraction velocity (gz = 0.65-1.12), and QoL (gz = 0.62-1.54). Between-group differences in shoulder press velocity (−0.09 m·s−1, gs = −0.95 [−1.63, −0.28]) and 6-minute walk test (−16.9 m, gs = −0.51 [−1.16, 0.13]) favored the PT group. In conclusion, home-based resistance training and walking lead to significant improvements in functional and psychological measures in adults with severe obesity. In addition, considering the between-group effect sizes and their uncertainty, performing resistance exercises with maximal concentric speed is a simple adjustment to conventional resistance training that yields negligible negative effects but potentially large benefits on walking capacity and upper-limb contraction velocity.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.