Numerical analysis of the local damage of RC beams under close-in explosions based on the calibrated Karagozian & Case (K&C) concrete model
Yingliang Xu
State Key Laboratory of Explosion Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China
Search for more papers by this authorYan Liu
State Key Laboratory of Explosion Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China
Beijing Institute of Technology Chongqing Innovation Center, Chongqing, China
Yangtze Delta Region Academy of Beijing Institute of Technology, Jiaxing, China
Search for more papers by this authorFenglei Huang
State Key Laboratory of Explosion Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Junbo Yan
State Key Laboratory of Explosion Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China
Yangtze Delta Region Academy of Beijing Institute of Technology, Jiaxing, China
Correspondence
Junbo Yan, State Key Laboratory of Explosion Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorFan Bai
State Key Laboratory of Explosion Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China
Search for more papers by this authorPeng Si
State Key Laboratory of Explosion Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China
Yangtze Delta Region Academy of Beijing Institute of Technology, Jiaxing, China
Search for more papers by this authorXu Li
State Key Laboratory of Explosion Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China
Search for more papers by this authorYingliang Xu
State Key Laboratory of Explosion Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China
Search for more papers by this authorYan Liu
State Key Laboratory of Explosion Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China
Beijing Institute of Technology Chongqing Innovation Center, Chongqing, China
Yangtze Delta Region Academy of Beijing Institute of Technology, Jiaxing, China
Search for more papers by this authorFenglei Huang
State Key Laboratory of Explosion Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Junbo Yan
State Key Laboratory of Explosion Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China
Yangtze Delta Region Academy of Beijing Institute of Technology, Jiaxing, China
Correspondence
Junbo Yan, State Key Laboratory of Explosion Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorFan Bai
State Key Laboratory of Explosion Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China
Search for more papers by this authorPeng Si
State Key Laboratory of Explosion Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China
Yangtze Delta Region Academy of Beijing Institute of Technology, Jiaxing, China
Search for more papers by this authorXu Li
State Key Laboratory of Explosion Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Limited research has been carried out to investigate the local damage features of reinforced concrete (RC) beams under close-in explosions. To better capture the local damage features of rectangular cross-sectional RC beams, a numerical study on the RC beams subjected to close-in explosions based on the calibrated Karagozian & Case (K&C) concrete model was conducted in LSDYNA. First, a systematic calibration of the K&C model for concrete was performed in the single-element numerical analysis. Calibration of the K&C model consists of parameter determination for the new strength surfaces, modification of the damage function to better feature the tensile behavior of concrete, elimination of the element size effect by introducing an element size factor and determination of the scaled damage factors. The new strength surfaces are verified and determined through both the approximation calculation method and the parameter fitting method. And the damage function was modified by reducing the termination of λ to better characterize the brittleness of concrete and feature the tensile failure. A comparison between the numerical results and the corresponding experimental results demonstrates that the calibrated K&C model and established FEM model of RC beams subjected to close-in explosions can well characterize the local damage features of RC beams. On this basis, a further parameter analysis on the factors influencing the local damage response of RC beams was conducted by considering reinforcement details (stirrup spacing and longitudinal reinforcement diameter) and charge details (charge mass and aspect ratio). Results show that the close-in explosions destroyed the concrete corners in the blast surface with shear stress first and the side shear failure of concrete corners weakens the concrete core strength and contributes to the greater loss of concrete core. Rear spalling damage was initially caused by the bond failure between the tensile longitudinal reinforcement and the surrounding concrete. Furthermore, increasing stirrup spacing, tensile longitudinal reinforcement diameter, and charge mass contribute to the increase in local damage sizes.
Open Research
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
REFERENCES
- 1Kumar V, Kartik KV, Iqbal MA. Experimental and numerical investigation of reinforced concrete slabs under blast loading. Eng Struct. 2020; 206:110125.
- 2Zhao C, Chen Y, Jin Q, Wang J, Li X. Blast resistance of single steel-concrete composite slabs under contact explosion. Struct Concr. 2023; 24: 6025–6048.
- 3Goswami A, Ganesh T, Adhikary SD. RC structures subjected to combined blast and fragment impact loading: a state-of-the-art review on the present and the future outlook. Int J Impact Eng. 2022; 170: 104355.
- 4Abd El Nabi E, El Helloty A, Summra A. Numerical analysis of reinforced concrete buildings subjected to blast load. Struct Concr. 2023; 24: 3727–3743.
- 5Magnusson J, Hallgren M, Ansell A. Air-blast-loaded, high-strength concrete beams. Part I: experimental investigation. Mag Concr Res. 2010; 62: 127–136.
- 6Zhang C, Gholipour G, Mousavi AA. Blast loads induced responses of RC structural members: state-of-the-art review. Compos Part B. 2020; 195:108066.
- 7Zhang C, Gholipour G, Mousavi AA. Nonlinear dynamic behavior of simply-supported RC beams subjected to combined impact-blast loading. Eng Struct. 2019; 181: 124–142.
- 8Wei W, Zhang Y, Su J, Liu Y, Huang FL. Modification of SDOF model for reinforced concrete beams under close-in explosion. Def Technol. 2023; 20: 20162–20186.
- 9Dua A, Braimah A, Kumar M. Influence of standoff distance on the response of RC columns subjected to close-in explosions. J Struct Eng. 2022; 148:4022068.
- 10Dua A, Braimah A, Kumar M. Experimental and numerical investigation of rectangular reinforced concrete columns under contact explosion effects. Eng Struct. 2020; 205: 109891.
- 11Zhang D, Yao S, Lu F, Chen XG, Lin G, Wang W, et al. Experimental study on scaling of RC beams under close-in blast loading. Eng Fail Anal. 2013; 33: 33497–33504.
- 12Liu Y, Yan J, Huang F. Behavior of reinforced concrete beams and columns subjected to blast loading. Defence Tech. 2018; 14: 550–559.
- 13Nagata M, Beppu M, Ichino H, Matsuzawa R. A fundamental investigation of reinforced concrete beams subjected to close-in explosion. Int J Prot Struct. 2018; 9: 174–9198.
10.1177/2041419617716483 Google Scholar
- 14Mejía N, Peralta R, Tapia R, Durán R, Sarango A. Damage assessment of RC columns under the combined effects of contact explosion and axial loads by experimental and numerical investigations. Eng Struct. 2022; 254:113776.
- 15Xu Y, Huang F, Liu Y, Yan J, Bai F, Yu H, et al. Effect of close-in successive explosions on the blast behaviors of reinforced concrete beams: an experimental study. Structures. 2023; 53: 29–46.
- 16Yang C, Jia X, Huang Z, Zhao L, Shang W. Damage of full-scale reinforced concrete beams under contact explosion. Int J Impact Eng. 2022; 163:104180.
- 17Yan B, Liu F, Song D, Jiang ZG. Numerical study on damage mechanism of RC beams under close-in blast loading. Eng Fail Anal. 2015; 51: 9–19.
- 18Li J, Hao H. Numerical study of concrete spall damage to blast loads. Int J Impact Eng. 2014; 68: 41–55.
- 19Yao H, Jia X, Huang Z, Yang CZ, Shang W. Research on the damage law of reinforced concrete beams caused by cuboid explosives under contact explosion. J Phys Conf Ser. 2023; 2460:12090.
- 20Yu J, Yu X, Tang J, Deng Y. Local damage of precast concrete columns with grout sleeve connections under contact detonation. Eng Struct. 2022; 265:114499.
- 21Rao B, Chen L, Fang Q, Hong J, Liu ZX, Xiang HB. Dynamic responses of reinforced concrete beams under double-end-initiated close-in explosion. Def Technol. 2018; 14: 527–539.
- 22Yan J, Liu Y, Bai F, Ni X, Xu Y, Yan Z, et al. Dynamic response of GFRP-reinforced UHPC beams under close-in blast loading. Mater Design. 2022; 223:111140.
- 23Li Y, Aoude H. Effects of detailing on the blast and post-blast resilience of high-strength steel reinforced concrete (HSS-RC) beams. Eng Struct. 2020; 219: 110869.
- 24Fan Y, Chen L, Hong J, Yu R, Xiang H, Fang Q. Considering explosive charge shape and embedded depth in the design of concrete shelter thickness. Defence Tech. 2023; 20: 44–57.
- 25Chen L, Hu Y, Ren H, Xiang H, Zhai C, Fang Q. Performances of the RC column under close-in explosion induced by the double-end-initiation explosive cylinder. Int J Impact Eng. 2019; 132:103326.
- 26Wei W, Su J, Huang F. Development of pressure-impulse diagram to predict the damage of simply supported RC beams under close-in explosion. Process Saf Environ Prot. 2022; 167: 126–145.
- 27Tu H, Fung TC, Tan KH, Riedel W. An analytical model to predict spalling and breaching of concrete plates under contact detonation. Int J Impact Eng. 2022; 160:104075.
- 28Yu Y, Lee S, Ahn H, Cho J. Residual performance of reinforced concrete beams damaged by low-velocity impact loading. J Struct Eng. 2023; 149:4022267.
- 29Cui J, Hao H, Shi Y. Discussion on the suitability of concrete constitutive models for high-rate response predictions of RC structures. Int J Impact Eng. 2017; 106: 202–216.
- 30Wu Y, Crawford JE. Numerical modeling of concrete using a partially associative plasticity model. J Eng Mech. 2015; 141:4015051.
- 31 LSTC. LS-DYNA® keyword user's manual volume III. Livermore: Livermore Software Technology Corporation; 2021.
- 32Kong X, Fang Q, Li QM, Wu H, Crawford JE. Modified K&C model for cratering and scabbing of concrete slabs under projectile impact. Int J Impact Eng. 2017; 108: 217–228.
- 33Lowes LN. Finite element modeling of reinforced concrete beam-column bridge connections, PhD thesis. Berkeley: University of California; 1999.
- 34Salamon J. Evaluation of non-linear material models in concrete dams using finite element analysis. Denver: U.S Department of the Interior; 2014.
- 35Lee M, Kwak H, Park G. An improved calibration method of the K&C model for modeling steel-fiber reinforced concrete. Compos Struct. 2021; 269:114010.
- 36Zhang F, Shedbale AS, Zhong R, Poh LH, Zhang M. Ultra-high performance concrete subjected to high-velocity projectile impact: implementation of K&C model with consideration of failure surfaces and dynamic increase factors. Int J Impact Eng. 2021; 155:103907.
- 37Li X, Chen Q, Chen J, Liao J, Lu Y. Dynamic increase factor (DIF) for concrete in compression and tension in FE modelling with a local concrete model. Int J Impact Eng. 2022; 163:104079.
- 38Malvar LJ, Crawford JE, Wesevich JW, Simons D. A plasticity concrete material model for DYNA3D. Int J Impact Eng. 1997; 19: 847–873.
- 39Zheng BT, Teng JG. A plasticity constitutive model for concrete under multiaxial compression. Eng Struct. 2022; 251: 113435.
- 40Wei X, Ren X. Confinement enhanced damage-plasticity model for concrete. Mech Mater. 2023; 179:104589.
- 41Javanmardi P. Experimental study of triaxial behavior of concrete under lateral confining stress. Open Civ Eng J. 2017; 11: 11–291.
10.2174/1874149501711010281 Google Scholar
- 42Sfer D, Carol I, Gettu R, Etse G. Study of the behavior of concrete under triaxial compression. J Eng Mech. 2002; 128: 156–163.
- 43Yu Z, Huang Q, Shan Y, Ren Z. Failure criterion of ordinary concrete subjected to triaxial compression of full section and local loadings. J Mater Civ Eng. 2018; 30:4018239.
- 44Xie H, Dong Y, Li S. Study of a constitutive model of elasto-plastic damage of concrete in axial compression test under different pressures. Mei Tan Hsueh Pao (Journal of China Coal Society). 1996; 21: 265–270 (in Chinese).
- 45Xiong Y. Research on constitutive parameters of concrete based on the Johnson-Holmquist concrete model. Dissertation, Xi'an: Northwest Institute Nuclear of Technology. 2009 (in Chinese).
- 46Xiong Y, Chen J, Hu Y, Wang Y. Study on the key parameters of the Johnson-Holmquist constitutive model for concrete. Eng Mech. 2012; 29: 121–127 (in Chinese).
- 47Yan D, Lin G, Xu P. Dynamic strength and deformation of concrete in triaxial stress states. Eng Mech. 2007; 24: 58–64 (in Chinese).
- 48Hou Z. Research on concrete strength under triaxial stresses. Dissertation, Hebei: Hebei University of Technology. 2006 (in Chinese).
- 49Markovich N, Kochavi E, Ben-Dor G. Calibration of a concrete damage material model in LS-Dyna for a wide range of concrete strengths. International workshop on structures response to impact and blast (IWSRIB). 2009.
- 50Unosson M. Constitutive equations for concrete materials subjected to high rate of loading. PhD Dissertation, Institutionen för Systemteknik, Sweden. 2002.
- 51Xu J, Lu Y. Numerical modelling for reinforced concrete response to blast load: understanding the demands on material models. Special Publ. 2016; 306: 3.1–3.22.
- 52Xu H, Wen HM. A computational constitutive model for concrete subjected to dynamic loadings. Int J Impact Eng. 2016; 91: 116–125.
- 53Su Q, Wu H, Sun HS, Fang Q. Experimental and numerical studies on dynamic behavior of reinforced UHPC panel under medium-range explosions. Int J Impact Eng. 2021; 148:103761.
- 54Kucewicz M, Baranowski P, Małachowski J. Determination and validation of Karagozian-case concrete constitutive model parameters for numerical modeling of dolomite rock. Int J Rock Mech Min. 2020; 129:104302.
- 55Feng W, Chen B, Yang F, Liu F, Li L, Jing L, et al. Numerical study on blast responses of rubberized concrete slabs using the Karagozian and case concrete model. J Build Eng. 2021; 33:101610.
- 56Yin X, Li Q, Chen B, Xu S. An improved calibration of Karagozian & Case concrete/cementitious model for strain-hardening fibre-reinforced cementitious composites under explosion and penetration loadings. Cem Concr Compos. 2023; 137: 104911.
- 57Crawford JE, Wu Y, Choi H, Magallanes JM, Lan S. Use and validation of the release III K&C concrete material model in LS-DYNA. Glendale: Karagozian & Case; 2012.
- 58Mardalizad A, Caruso M, Manes A, Giglio M. Investigation of mechanical behaviour of a quasi-brittle material using Karagozian and case concrete (K&C) model. J Rock Mech Geotech. 2019; 11: 1119–1137.
- 59Xu S, Wu P, Wu C. Calibration of K&C concrete model for UHPC against low-velocity impact. Int J Impact Eng. 2020; 144:103648.
- 60Pyo S, El-Tawil S. Crack velocity-dependent dynamic tensile behavior of concrete. Int J Impact Eng. 2013; 55: 5563–5570.
- 61Weerheijm J, van Doormaal JCAM. Tensile failure of concrete at high loading rates: new test data on strength and fracture energy from instrumented spalling tests. Int J Impact Eng. 2007; 34(3): 609–626.
- 62Hordijk DA. Local approach to fatigue of concrete. 1993.
- 63Li QM, Meng H. About the dynamic strength enhancement of concrete-like materials in a split Hopkinson pressure bar test. Int J Solids Struct. 2003; 40: 343–360.
- 64Flores-Johnson EA, Li QM. Structural effects on compressive strength enhancement of concrete-like materials in a split Hopkinson pressure bar test. Int J Impact Eng. 2017; 109: 408–418.
- 65Hao Y, Hao H. Influence of the concrete DIF model on the numerical predictions of RC wall responses to blast loadings. Eng Struct. 2014; 73: 7324–7338.
- 66Xu H, Wen HM. Semi-empirical equations for the dynamic strength enhancement of concrete-like materials. Int J Impact Eng. 2013; 60: 76–81.
- 67Kong X, Fang Q, Zhang J, Zhang Y. Numerical prediction of dynamic tensile failure in concrete by a corrected strain-rate dependent nonlocal material model. Int J Impact Eng. 2020; 137:103445.
- 68Lu Y, Li Q. About the dynamic uniaxial tensile strength of concrete-like materials. Int J Impact Eng. 2011; 38: 171–180.
- 69Zeng X, Wang Z, Huo J. Tensile behavior of 400 MPa-grade anti-earthquake hot-rolled ribbed bar (HRB400E) over a wide strain rate range. Constr Build Mater. 2020; 249:118729.
- 70Qi J, Cheng Z, Ma ZJ, Wang J, Liu J. Bond strength of reinforcing bars in ultra-high performance concrete: experimental study and fiber–matrix discrete model. Eng Struct. 2021; 248:113290.
- 71Zhao W, Zhu B. Theoretical model for the bond–slip relationship between ribbed steel bars and confined concrete. Struct Concr. 2018; 19: 548–558.
- 72Fan Y, Chen L, Li Z, Xiang H, Fang Q. Modeling the blast load induced by a close-in explosion considering cylindrical charge parameters. Defence Tech. 2023; 24: 83–108.