A robust structural parameter estimation method using seismic response measurements
Muge Kuleli
Department of Civil Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Tomonori Nagayama
Department of Civil Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Correspondence
Tomonori Nagayama, Department of Civil Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Faculty of Engineering Bldg.1, Hongo Campus, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorMuge Kuleli
Department of Civil Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Tomonori Nagayama
Department of Civil Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Correspondence
Tomonori Nagayama, Department of Civil Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Faculty of Engineering Bldg.1, Hongo Campus, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorSummary
Although successful applications of data assimilation techniques such as Kalman filter to structural parameter identification problems exist in literature, they have been explored mostly via simulations because real-world application poses challenges. Current practice is to set the process and measurement noise covariance matrices by manual tuning and keeping them constant over the estimation period. However, when the matrices are not correct, Kalman filters are prone to suboptimal performance and/ or even divergence. In this paper, use of a stochastic approximation scheme along with the unscented Kalman filter is explored. The sensitivity of the initial filter parameter selection has been investigated through both simulations and full-scale laboratory experiments. Results show that by automatically updating the filter statistics, system states, including the structural parameters, are successfully estimated with a fast convergence rate, good accuracy, and trackability in a stable and objective manner. The method is further applied to in situ seismic response records of a box-girder bridge. The stiffness values of the rubber bearings are successfully identified.
REFERENCES
- 1Wan EA, Rudolph VDM. The unscented Kalman filter for nonlinear estimation. IEEE; 2000: 153-158.
- 2Rudolph VDM. Sigma-point Kalman filters for probabilistic inference in dynamic state-space models; 2004.
- 3Julier SJ, Uhlmann JK, Durrant-Whyte HF. A new approach for filtering nonlinear systems. In: Proceedings of the American Control Conference. IEEE; 1995: 1628-1632.
- 4Julier SJ, Uhlmann JK. A new extension of the Kalman filter to nonlinear systems. In: Proceeding of AeroSense: The 11th International Sysmpsium on Aerospace/ Defence Sensing, Simulation and Controls. Orlando, FL; 1997: 182-193.
- 5Julier SJ, Uhlmann JK. Unscented filtering and nonlinear estimation. Proc IEEE. 2004; 92(3): 401-422.
- 6Chung-Bang Y, Masanobu S. Identification of nonlinear structural dynamic systems. J Struct Mech. 1980; 8(2): 187-203.
10.1080/03601218008907359 Google Scholar
- 7Masaru H, Etsuro S. Structural identification by extended Kalman filter. J Eng Mech. 1984; 110(12): 1757-1770.
- 8Yang JN, Lin S, Huang H, Zhou L. An adaptive extended Kalman filter for structural damage identification. Struct Cont Health Mon. 2006; 13(4): 849-867.
- 9Chin-Hsiung L, Sheng-Tsai C. A three-stage identification approach for hysteretic systems. Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics. 1993; 22(2): 129-150.
- 10Chin-Hsiung L, Iat-Chun T. A system identification approach to the detection of changes in both linear and non-linear structural parameters. Earthq Eng struct Dyn. 1995; 24(1): 85-97.
- 11Serdar S, Feng Maria Q. Instantaneous damage detection of bridge structures and experimental verification. Struct Cont Health Mon. 2008; 15(7): 958-973.
- 12Stefano M, Aldo G. Unscented Kalman filtering for nonlinear structural dynamics. Nonlinear Dyn. 2007; 49(1): 131-150.
- 13Chatzi EN, Smyth AW. The unscented Kalman filter and particle filter methods for nonlinear structural system identification with non-collocated heterogeneous sensing. Struct Cont Health Mon. 2009; 16(1): 99-123.
- 14Chatzi EN, Smyth AW, Masri SF. Experimental application of on-line parametric identification for nonlinear hysteretic systems with model uncertainty. Struct Safe. 2010; 32(5): 326-337.
- 15Omrani R, Hudson RE, Taciroglu E. Parametric identification of nondegrading hysteresis in a laterally and torsionally coupled building using an unscented Kalman filter. J Eng Mech. 2012; 139(4): 452-468.
- 16Kontoroupi T, Smyth AW. Online noise identification for joint state and parameter estimation of nonlinear systems. ASCE-ASME J Risk Uncert Eng Sys Part Civ Eng. 2015; 2(3):B4015006.
- 17Julier SJ. The scaled unscented transformation. In: Proceedings of the 2002 American Control Conference (IEEE Cat. No.CH37301). IEEE; 2002: 4555-4559.
- 18Mehra R. Approaches to adaptive filtering. IEEE Trans Auto Cont. 1972; 17(5): 693-698.
- 19Duník J, Ŝimandl M, Straka O. Methods for estimating state and measurement noise covariance matrices: aspects and comparison. IFAC Proc Vol. 2009; 42(10): 372-377.
10.3182/20090706-3-FR-2004.00061 Google Scholar
- 20Crassidis JL, Landis MF. Unscented filtering for spacecraft attitude estimation. J Guid Cont Dyn. 2003; 26(4): 536-542.
- 21Åkesson BM, Jørgensen JB, Poulsen NK, Jørgensen SB. A generalized autocovariance least-squares method for Kalman filter tuning. J Proc Cont. 2008; 18(7-8): 769-779.
- 22Naik N, Gemson RMO, Ananthasayanam MR, et al. Introduction to the Kalman filter and tuning its statistics for near optimal estimates and Cramer Rao bound. arXiv preprint arXiv. 2015; 1503: 04313.
- 23Mehra R. On the identification of variances and adaptive Kalman filtering. IEEE Trans Auto Cont. 1970; 15(2): 175-184.
- 24Maybeck PS. Stochastic models, estimation, and control. New York: Academic press; 1979.
- 25Mohamed AH, Schwarz KP. Adaptive Kalman filtering for INS/GPS. J Geodesy. 1999; 73(4): 193-203.
- 26Maybeck PS. Multiple model adaptive algorithms for detecting and compensating sensor and actuator/surface failures in aircraft flight control systems. Int J Rob Nonlinear Cont. 1999; 9(14): 1051-1070.
- 27Soken HE, Sakai S. Adaptive tuning of the unscented Kalman filter for satellite attitude estimation. J Aero Eng. 2014; 28(3):04014088.
- 28Tremain NA. Nonlinear estimation and modeling of noisy time-series by dual Kalman filtering methods; 2000.
- 29Haykin SS. Kalmanfiltering and neural networks. New York: Wiley Online Library; 2001.
- 30Robbins H, Monro S. A stochastic approximation method. Anna math Stat. 1951: 400-407.
10.1214/aoms/1177729586 Google Scholar
- 31Spall JC. Introduction to stochastic search and optimization: estimation, simulation, and control:John Wiley & Sons; 2005.
- 32Lennart L, Torsten S. Theory and practice of recursive identification. JSTOR; 1983.
- 33Sum JPF, Leung CS, Chan LW. Extended Kalman filter in recurrent neural network training and pruning, Tech. Rep., Department of Computer Science and Engineering; 1996. CS-TR-96-05.
- 34Sum JPF. Extended Kalman filter based pruning algorithms and several aspects of neural network learning: PhD thesis Chinese University of Hong Kong; 1998.
- 35Ramadurai S, Kosari SN, King HH, Chizeck HJ, Hannaford B. Application of unscented Kalman filter to a cable driven surgical robot: a simulation study. In: Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2012 IEEE InternationalConference on. IEEE; 2012: 1495-1500.
- 36Havlicek M, Friston KJ, Jan J, Brazdil M, Calhoun VD. Dynamic modeling of neuronal responses in fMRI using cubature Kalman filtering. NeuroImage. 2011; 56(4): 2109-2128.
- 37Dominik S, Andrzej D. Fractional Kalman filter algorithm for the states, parameters and order of fractional system estimation. Int J Appl Math Comput Sci. 2006; 16: 129-140.
- 38Bishop CM. Pattern recognition and machine learning. Springer; 2006.
- 39Ukon H, Kajiwara K, Kawashima K, et al. Large-scale shake table experiment on a component model (C1-1model) using E-defense - experiment on a RC column build in 1970s which fails in flexure-. Tech Note Nation Res Inst Earth Sci Dis Prev. 2009; 331: 3.
- 40Bommer JJ, Alejandro MP. The prediction of strong-motion duration for engineering design; 1996.
- 41Arias A. Measure of earthquake intensity. Santiago de Chile:Massachusetts Inst. of Tech., Cambridge, Univ. of Chile; 1970.
- 42April C, Brady AG. BAP: Basic strong-motion accelerogram processing software version 1.0. US Geological Survey Virginia:US Department of the Interior; 1992.
- 43Boore DM, Bommer JJ. Processing of strong-motion accelerograms: needs, options and consequences. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 2005; 25(2): 93-115.
- 44Boore DM. On pads and filters: processing strong-motion data. Bullet Seismol Soc Amer. 2005; 95(2): 745-750.
- 45Priestley MJN, Grant DN. Viscous damping in seismic design and analysis. J Earthq Eng. 2005; 9(spec02): 229-255.
- 46Suzuki M, Jinno K, Tashiro Y, et al. Development and field experiment of routing-free multi-hop wireless sensor networks for structuralmonitoring:179-184. In: Proceedings of the CSIC Conference on International Conference on Smart Infrastructure and Construction (ICSIC 2016).Robinson College; 2016; Cambridge.
- 47Suzuki M, Nagayama T, Ohara S, Morikawa H. Structural monitoring using concurrent transmission flooding the institute of electronics. Inform Commu Eng (in Japanese). 2017; J100-B(12).
- 48 SEIKO EPSON Corporation. Accelerometer M-A351AS M-A351AU data heet. https://global.epson.com/products_and_drivers/sensing_system/download_hidden/pdf/m-a351_datasheet_e_rev1_0.pdf; 2016.