Semi-active and passive control of the phase I linear base-isolated benchmark building model
Zhou Xu
Department of Civil Engineering, The City College of New York, New York, NY 10031, U.S.A.
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Anil K. Agrawal
Department of Civil Engineering, The City College of New York, New York, NY 10031, U.S.A.
Department of Civil Engineering, The City College of New York, New York, NY 10031, U.S.A.Search for more papers by this authorJann N. Yang
Department of Civil Engineering, University of California at Irvine, CA 92697, U.S.A.
Search for more papers by this authorZhou Xu
Department of Civil Engineering, The City College of New York, New York, NY 10031, U.S.A.
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Anil K. Agrawal
Department of Civil Engineering, The City College of New York, New York, NY 10031, U.S.A.
Department of Civil Engineering, The City College of New York, New York, NY 10031, U.S.A.Search for more papers by this authorJann N. Yang
Department of Civil Engineering, University of California at Irvine, CA 92697, U.S.A.
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
In this paper various semi-active control strategies and linear passive dampers are applied to the benchmark building model to evaluate their effectiveness in reducing response quantities of the building subject to prescribed earthquakes. These control strategies include: semi-active continuous pulse friction (SACPF) controller, semi-active discontinuous pulse friction (SADPF) controller, linear passive viscous (LPV) damper, smooth boundary layer semi-active friction (SBLSAF) controller, resetting semi-active stiffness damper (RSASD) and visco-elastic friction (VEF) damper. Both SACPF and SADPF controllers are designed by using the augmented structure-pulse filter model recently proposed. Extensive simulation results indicate that all these controllers are very effective in mitigating the base displacements. For different controllers, a reduction in the base displacement may result in an increase of other quantities, e.g. the base and superstructure shears, inter-storey drifts and floor accelerations, during some earthquakes. Average results of the performance indices J1–J5 indicate that various semi-active friction controllers, including SACPF, SADPF, SBLSAF and VEF, are most effective followed by the RSASD and the sample semi-active controller. Overall, SACPF and SADPF controllers have better capability of reducing all response quantities compared with other semi-active controllers. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
REFERENCES
- 1 Housner GW, Bergman LA, Caughey TK, Chassiakos AG, Claus RO, Masri SF, Skelton RE, Soong TT, Spencer BF Jr, Yao TP. Structural control: past, present, and future. Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE) 1997; 123(9): 897–971.
- 2 Soong TT, Spencer BF. Supplemental energy dissipation: state-of-the-art and state-of-the-practice. Engineering Structures 2002; 24: 243–259.
- 3 Spencer BF, Nagarajaiah S. State of the art of structural control. Journal of Structural Engineering 2003; 129(7): 845–856.
- 4 Symans MD, Constantinou MC. Semi-active control systems for seismic protection of structures: a state-of-the-art review. Engineering Structures 1999; 21(6): 469–487.
- 5 Spencer BF, Dyke SJ, Deoskar HS. Benchmark problems in structural control: part 1—active mass driver system. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1998; 27(11): 1127–1139.
- 6 Spencer BF, Dyke SJ, Deoskar HS. Benchmark problems in structural control: part 2—active tendon system. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1998; 27(11): 1141–1147.
- 7 Dyke SJ, Caicedo JM, Turan G, Bergman LA, Hague S. Phase 1: benchmark control problem for seismic response of cable-stayed bridges. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 2003; 129(7): 857–872.
- 8 Yang JN, Agrawal AK, Samali B, Wu JC. A benchmark problem for response control of wind excited tall buildings. Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE) 2004; 130(4): 437–446.
- 9 Ohtori Y, Christenson RE, Spencer BF, Dyke SJ. Benchmark problems in seismically excited nonlinear buildings. Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE) 2004; 130(4): 366–385.
- 10 Agrawal AK, Tan P, Nagarajaiah S, Zhang J. Development of a benchmark structural control model for a highway bridge. Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Structural Control and Health Monitoring, Columbia University, New York, June 2004; 103–109, DEStech Pubs.
- 11 Narasimhan S, Nagarajaiah S, Johnson EA, Gavin HP. Smart base isolated benchmark building part I: problem definition. Journal Structural Control and Structural Health Monitoring 2006.
- 12 Nagarajaiah S, Narasimhan S. Smart base isolated benchmark building part II: sample controllers for linear and friction isolation. Journal Structural Control and Structural Health Monitoring 2006.
- 13 Xu Z, Agrawal AK. Applications of several semi-active control systems to the benchmark base isolated building. Proceedings of the ASCE Engineering Mechanics Conference, Newark (DE), June 2004, CD-ROM.
- 14 Kim S, Spencer BF, Yun CB. Sliding mode fuzzy control for smart base isolated building. Proceedings of the ASCE Engineering Mechanics Conference, Newark (DE), June 2004, CD-ROM.
- 15 Reigles D, Symans MD. Application of supervisory fuzzy logic controller to the base-isolated benchmark structure. Proceedings of the ASCE Engineering Mechanics Conference, Newark (DE), June 2004, CD-ROM.
- 16 Choi KM, Jung HJ, Lee IW. Fuzzy control strategies for seismic response reduction of smart base isolated benchmark building. Proceedings of the ASCE Engineering Mechanics Conference, Newark (DE), June 2004, CD-ROM.
- 17 Jung HJ, Moon YJ, Jang JE, Spencer BF. Robust hybrid control systems for seismic protection of benchmark base isolated building. Proceedings of the ASCE Engineering Mechanics Conference, Newark (DE), June 2004, CD-ROM.
- 18 Yang JN, Agrawal AK. Semi-active hybrid control systems for nonlinear buildings against near-field earthquake. Journal of Engineering Structures 2002; 24: 271–280.
- 19 Heaton TH, Hall JF, Wald DJ, Halling MW. Response of high-rise and base-isolated buildings to a hypothetical Mw7.0 blind thrust earthquake. Science 1995; 267: 206–211.
- 20 Yang JN, Li Z, Wu JC, Hsu IR. Control of sliding-isolated buildings using dynamic linearization. Journal of Engineering Structures 1994; 16(6): 437–444.
- 21 Yang JN, Wu JC, Agrawal AK. Sliding mode control of nonlinear and hysteretic structures. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 1995; 121(12): 1386–1390.
- 22 Yang JN, Wu JC, Kawashima K, Unjoh S. Hybrid control of seismic-excited bridge structures. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1995; 24: 1437–1451.
- 23 Spencer BF, Johnson EA, Ramallo JC. ‘Smart’ isolation for seismic control. JSME Ser. C: Special Issue on Frontiers of Motion and Vibration Control 2000; 43(3): 704–711.
- 24 Ramallo JC, Johnson EA, Spencer BF. Smart base isolation systems. Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE) 2002; 128(10): 1088–1099.
- 25 Yoshioka H, Ramallo JC, Spencer BF. ‘Smart’ base isolation strategies employing magneto-rheological dampers. Journal of Engineering Mechanic 2002; 128(5): 540–551.
- 26 Nagarajaiah S. Fuzzy controller for structures with hybrid isolation system. Proceedings of the 1st World Conference on Structural Control, University of Southern California, California, August 1994, TA2-67-76.
- 27 Nagarajaiah S, Riley MA, Reinhorn AM. Control of sliding isolated bridges with absolute acceleration feedback. Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE) 1993; 119(11): 2317–2332.
- 28 He WL. Smart energy dissipation systems for protection of civil infrastructures from near-field earthquakes. Ph.D. Dissertation, The City University of New York, New York, 2003.
- 29 He WL, Agrawal AK. An analytical model of ground motion pluses for the design and assessment of smart protective systems. Journal of Structural Engineering (accepted).
- 30 Agrawal AK, Xu Z, He WL. Ground motion pulse based active control of a linear base-isolated benchmark building. Journal of Structural Control and Health Monitoring 2006.
- 31 He WL, Agrawal AK, Yang JN. Novel semiactive friction controller for linear structures against earthquakes. Journal of Structural Engineering 2003; 129(7): 941–950.
- 32 Saharabudhe S, Nagarajaiah S. Seismic response control of sliding isolated bridges with MR dampers: experimental study. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics Journal 2005; 34: Published online 31 January 2005.
- 33 Inaudi JA. Modulated homogeneous friction: a novel semi-active damping strategy. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1997; 26: 361–376.
- 34 Bobrow JE, Jabbari F, Thai K. A new approach to shock isolation and vibration suppression using a resettable actuator. ASME Transactions on Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control 2000; 122: 570–573.
- 35 Yang JN, Kim JH, Agrawal AK. A resetting semiactive stiffness damper for seismic responses control. Journal of Structural Engineering 2000; 126(12): 1427–1433.
- 36 Agrawal AK, Yang JN, He WL. Applications of some semi-active control systems to benchmark cable-stayed bridge. Journal of Structural Engineering 2003; 129(7): 884–894.
- 37 Jabbari F, Bobrow JE. Vibration suppression with resettable device. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 2002; 128(9): 916–924.
- 38 Nagarajaiah S, Mate D. Semi-active control of continuously variable stiffness system. Proceedings of the 2nd World Conference on Structural Control, Kyoto, Japan 1998; 1: 397–406.
- 39 Nadathur V, Nagarajaiah S. Wind response control of building with variable stiffness tuned mass damper using empirical mode decomposition and Hilbert transform. Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE) 2004; 130(4): 451–458.
- 40 Narasimhan S, Nagarajaiah S. STFT algorithm for semiactive control of base isolated buildings with variable stiffness isolation systems subjected to near fault earthquakes. Engineering Structures 2005; 27: 514–523.
- 41 Chen GD, Chen CC. Behavior of piezoelectric friction dampers under dynamic loading. Proceedings of the SPIE Symposium on Smart Structures and Materials: Smart Systems for Bridges, Structures and Highways, Newport Beach, CA, 2000; 3988: 54–63.