Volume 29, Issue 7-8 pp. 945-955
Research Article

Modelling multiple sources of dissemination bias in meta-analysis

Jack Bowden

Corresponding Author

Jack Bowden

MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge, U.K.

MRC Biostatistics Unit, Institute of Public Health, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0SR, U.K.Search for more papers by this author
Dan Jackson

Dan Jackson

MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge, U.K.

Search for more papers by this author
Simon G. Thompson

Simon G. Thompson

MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge, U.K.

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 08 March 2010
Citations: 14

Abstract

Asymmetry in the funnel plot for a meta-analysis suggests the presence of dissemination bias. This may be caused by publication bias through the decisions of journal editors, by selective reporting of research results by authors or by a combination of both. Typically, study results that are statistically significant or have larger estimated effect sizes are more likely to appear in the published literature, hence giving a biased picture of the evidence-base. Previous statistical approaches for addressing dissemination bias have assumed only a single selection mechanism. Here we consider a more realistic scenario in which multiple dissemination processes, involving both the publishing authors and journals, are operating. In practical applications, the methods can be used to provide sensitivity analyses for the potential effects of multiple dissemination biases operating in meta-analysis. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.