Volume 18, Issue 1 pp. 20-31
Research Article

Sustainable consumption: green consumer behaviour when purchasing products

William Young

Corresponding Author

William Young

Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, UK

Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UKSearch for more papers by this author
Kumju Hwang

Kumju Hwang

Department of Business Administration, College of Business Administration, Chonnam National University, South Korea

Search for more papers by this author
Seonaidh McDonald

Seonaidh McDonald

Aberdeen Business School, Robert Gordon University, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Caroline J. Oates

Caroline J. Oates

Management School, University of Sheffield, UK

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 10 March 2009
Citations: 1,055

Abstract

The ‘attitude–behaviour gap’ or ‘values–action gap’ is where 30% of consumers report that they are very concerned about environmental issues but they are struggling to translate this into purchases. For example, the market share for ethical foods remains at 5 per cent of sales. This paper investigates the purchasing process for green consumers in relation to consumer technology products in the UK. Data were collected from 81 self-declared green consumers through in depth interviews on recent purchases of technology products. A green consumer purchasing model and success criteria for closing the gap between green consumers' values and their behaviour are developed. The paper concludes that incentives and single issue labels (like the current energy rating label) would help consumers concentrate their limited efforts. More fundamentally, ‘being green’ needs time and space in people's lives that is not available in increasingly busy lifestyles. Implications for policy and business are proposed. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.