Lasting community wellbeing: Comparison of Lisbon and Tokyo
Corresponding Author
Yoichi Kumagai
SERS, University of Waterloo, Canada
CEG-IST, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal
Correspondence
Yoichi Kumagai, SERS, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 3G1.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorMaria Partidario
CEG-IST, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal
Aalborg University, Denmark
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Yoichi Kumagai
SERS, University of Waterloo, Canada
CEG-IST, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal
Correspondence
Yoichi Kumagai, SERS, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 3G1.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorMaria Partidario
CEG-IST, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal
Aalborg University, Denmark
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
This paper introduces the concept of lasting community wellbeing (LCW), through the lens of five sustainability-related features at the neighborhood scale in larger city-regions. The LCW features are vicinity, sense of place, urban and suburban farming, safety and learning, which emphasize continuity of individual and collective satisfaction of local daily lives based on hedonic and eudaimonic outcomes. This exploratory study creates a framework of LCW and investigates whether the five features are useful as an LCW framework in the comparison between Lisbon and Tokyo in identifying similarities and differences. Applying the framework to the comparative case studies shows that the five features are relevant and strategic for analyzing sustainability of daily lives at the neighborhood scale, while accommodating multiple cultural differences.
REFERENCES
- Avruch, K. (1998). Culture and conflict resolution. In What is culture? In A compilation of quotations compiled by Helen Spencer-Oatey. Retrieved from https://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/al/globalpad/openhouse/interculturalskills/global_pad_-_what_is_culture.pdf. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace.
- Bache, I. (2013). Measuring quality of life for public policy: An idea whose time has come? Agenda-setting dynamics in the European Union. J Eur Publ Policy, 20(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2012.699658
- Baldwin, C., & King, R. (2017). What about the People? The socially sustainable, resilient community and urban Development Oxford, UK: Oxford Brookes University.
- Boniwell, I. (2016). The concept of eudaimonic well-being. Retrieved from http://positivepsychology.org.uk/the-concept-of-eudaimonic-well-being. London, UK: Positive Psychology UK.
- Buffel, T., De Backer, F., Peeters, J., Phillipson, C., Romero Reina, V., Kindekens, A., … Lombaerts, K. (2014). Promoting sustainable communities through intergenerational practices. Procedia Soc Behav Sci, 116, 1785–1791.
10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.472 Google Scholar
- CIW (Canadian Index of Wellbeing) (2016). How are Canadians Really Doing? The 2016 CIW National Report. Waterloo, Canada: Canadian Index of Wellbeing and University of Waterloo.
- Cloutier, S., & Pfeiffer, D. (2015). Sustainability through happiness: A framework for sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 23(5), 317–327. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1593
- CML (Câmara Municipal de Lisboa). (2009). Relatório de Estado do Ordenamento do Território. Retrieved from: http://www.cm-lisboa.pt/fileadmin/VIVER/Urbanismo/urbanismo/planeamento/pdm/docs/revisao/estudos/01_REOT.pdf
- CML (Câmara Municipal de Lisboa). (2012). Plano Local de Habitação de Lisboa – 3ª fase (Concretizar). Retrieved from: http://habitacao.cm-lisboa.pt/index.htm?no=4010001
- CML (Câmara Municipal de Lisboa). (2015). Plano Diretor Municipal de Lisboa. Retrieved from: http://www.cm-lisboa.pt/viver/urbanismo/planeamento-urbano/plano-diretor-municipal
- Collin, J. P., Dagenais, M., & Poitras, C. (2003). From city to city-region: Historical perspective on the contentious definitions of the Montreal Metropolitan Area. Can J Urban Res, 12(1), 16–34.
- Cresswell, T., & Hoskins, G. (2008). Place, persistence, and practice: Evaluating historical significance at Angel Island, San Francisco, and Maxwell Street, Chicago. Ann Assoc Am Geogr, 98(2), 392–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045600701879409
- Dangi, T. B., & Jamal, T. (2016). An integrated approach to “Sustainable Community-based Tourism”. Sustainability, 8, 475.
- Dempsey, N., Bramley, G., Power, S., & Brown, C. (2011). The social dimension of sustainable development: Defining urban social sustainability. Sustainable Development, 19(5), 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.417
- Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being. The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. Am Psychol, 55(1), 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.34
- Dolan, P., & Metcalfe, R. (2011). Measuring subjective wellbeing for public policy: Recommendations on measures. London, UK: Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics and Poltical Sciences.
- Elliott, J., Gale, C. R., Parsons, S., Kuh, D., & The HALCyon Study Team (2014). Neighbourhood cohesion and mental wellbeing among older adults: A mixed methods approach. Soc Sci Med, 107, 44–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.02.027
- Friedmann, J. (2010). Place and place-making in cities: A global perspective. Plan Theory Pract, 11(2), 149–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649351003759573
10.1080/14649351003759573 Google Scholar
- Gibson, R. B. (2016). Foundations: Sustainability and requirements for getting there. In R. B. Gibson (Ed.), Sustainability assessment: Applications and opportunities. London, UK: Routledge.
10.4324/9781315754048 Google Scholar
- Gibson, R. B. (2017). Sustainability assessment, climate change and lasting community wellbeing. Presented at International Association of Impact Assessment Annual Conference, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
- Gibson, R. B., Alexander, D. H. M., & Tomalty, R. (1997). Putting Cities in their place: Ecosystem based Planning for Canadian urban regions. In M. Roseland (Ed.), Eco-city dimensions: Healthy Communities, healthy planet (pp. 25–40). Gabriola Island, Canada: New Society Publishers.
- Gibson, R. B., Hassan, S., Holtz, S., Tansey, J., & Whitelaw, G. (2005). Sustainability assessment: Criteria and processes. London, UK: Earthscan Publications.
- Helne, T., & Hirvilammi, T. (2015). Wellbeing and sustainability: A relational approach. Sustainable Development, 23(3), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1581
- Jackson, T. (2009). Prosperity without growth: Economics for a finite planet. London, UK: Eathscan.
10.4324/9781849774338 Google Scholar
- Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
- Khanlou, N., & Wray, R. (2014). A whole community approach toward child and youth resilience promotion: A review of resilience literature. Int J Ment Heal Addict, 12, 64–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-013-9470-1
- Kingsley, G. T., Coulton, C. J., & Pettit, K. L. S. (2014). Strengthening Communities with neighborhood data. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
- Kumagai, Y. (2016). Applying a sustainability assessment framework to recovery plans in eastern Tohoku, Japan. In R. B. Gibson (Ed.), Sustainability assessment -Applications and opportunities. Abingdon. UK: Routledge.
- Kumagai, Y., Gibson, R. B., & Filion, P. (2010). Translating resilience into the urban context: Past successes and future uncertainties in Tokyo. Crit Plan, 17, 66–87.
- Kumagai, Y., Gibson, R. B., & Filion, P. (2015). Evaluating long-term urban resilience through an examination of the history of green spaces in Tokyo. Local Environ, 20(9), 1018–1039. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2014.887060
- Lee, S. J., & Kim, Y. (2015). Searching for the meaning of community well-being. In S. J. Lee, Y. Kim, & P. Rhonda (Eds.), Community well-being and community development. Geneva, Switzerland: Springer International.
10.1007/978-3-319-12421-6_2 Google Scholar
- Litman, T. (2003). Measuring transportation: Traffic, mobility and accessibility. Inst Transport Eng, ITE Journal, 73(10), 28–32.
- Luederitz, C., Lang, D. J., & Von Wehrden, H. (2013). A systematic review of guiding principles for sustainable urban neighborhood development. Landsc Urban Plan, 118, 40–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.06.002
- Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Merrick, M., & Martin, S. (2014). Strengthening Communities with neighborhood data. In G. Kingsley, C. J. Coulton, & K. L. S. Pettit (Eds.), Creating and using neighborhood data to shape a more equitable regional greenspace policy (pp. 249–264). Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
- Meuleman, L. (2008). Public management and the metagovernance of hierarchies, networks and markets: The feasibility of designing and management governance styles. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
- MLIT (Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transportation and Tourism) (2014). White paper on Development of the Capital The Region [Shutoken hakusho]. Tokyo: Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transportation and Tourism.
- MLIT (Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transportation and Tourism) (2017). White paper on Development of the Capital The Region [Shutoken hakusho]. Tokyo: Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transportation and Tourism.
- Mouratidis, K. (2018). Rethinking how built environments influence subjective well-being: A new conceptual framework. J Urban: Int Res Placemaking Urban Sustain, 11(1), 24–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2017.1310749
10.1080/17549175.2017.1310749 Google Scholar
-
OECD (2015). How's Life? 2015: Measuring Well-being. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
10.1787/how_life-2015-en Google Scholar
- Ostrom, E. (2009). A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science, 325(5939), 419–422. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172133.PubMed:19628857
- Partidário, M. R. (2007). Strategic Environmental Assessment Good Practices Guide—Methodological guidance. Lisbon, Portugal: Agência Portuguesa do Ambiente.
- Partidário, M. R. (2016). Using strategic thinking and critical decision factors to achieve sustainability. In R. B. Gibson (Ed.), Sustainability assessment: Applications and opportunities (pp. 169–193). London, UK: Earthscan Publications.
- PPS (Project for Public Spaces) (2016). Placemaking – what if we built our cities around places? . New York, NY: Project for Public Spaces.
- Roseland, M. (2012). Toward sustainable Communities: Solutions for citizens and their governments. Gabriola Island, Canada: New Society Publishers.
- Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annu Rev Psychol, 52, 141–166. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141
- Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. J Pers Soc Psychol, 69(4), 719–727. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.719
- Schleicher, J., Schaafsma, M., Burgess, N. D., Sandbrook, C., Danks, F., Cowie, C., & Vira, B. (2018). Poorer without it? The neglected role of the natural environment in poverty and wellbeing. Sustainable Development, 26(1), 83–98. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1692
- Scott, A. J. (2006). Entrepreneurship, innovation and industrial development: Geography and the creative field revisited. Small Bus Econ, 26(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-004-6493-9
- Taylor, T. E. (2015). Towards consensus on well-being. In J. H. Soraker, J. W. Van der Rijt, J. Boer, P. H. Wong, & P. Brey (Eds.), Well-being in contemporary society. Geneva, Switzerland: Springer International.
10.1007/978-3-319-06459-8_1 Google Scholar
- TMG (Tokyo Metropolitan Government) (2014). Tokyo Metropolitan long-term vision [Tokyo-to chouki vision]. In Tokyo: Tokyo Metropolitan Government.
- Vanclay, F. (2008). Place matters. In F. Vanclay, M. Higgins, & A. Blackshaw (Eds.), Making sense of place: Exploring concepts and expressions of place through different senses and lenses. National Museum of Australia Press.
- Veenhoven, R. (2012). Happiness: Also known as “life satisfaction” and “subjective well-being”. In K. C. Land, A. C. Michalos, & M. J. Sirgy (Eds.), Subjective well-being. Handbook of social indicators and quality of life research (pp. 63–77). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
10.1007/978-94-007-2421-1_3 Google Scholar
- Williams, K., & Dair, C. (2007). A framework of sustainable behaviours that can be enabled through the design of neighbourhood-scale developments. Sustain Dev, 15(3), 160–173. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.311