Robust Space-to-Ground Laser Communication Downlink Scheduling Under Uncertainty Derived From Multisource
Pei Lyu
School of Electronic Science and Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Kanglian Zhao
School of Electronic Science and Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
Correspondence:
Kanglian Zhao ([email protected])
Search for more papers by this authorTomaso de Cola
Institute of Communications and Navigation, German Aerospace Center, Wessling, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorHangsheng Zhao
School of Telecommunication and Information Engineering, Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing, China
Search for more papers by this authorPei Lyu
School of Electronic Science and Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Kanglian Zhao
School of Electronic Science and Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
Correspondence:
Kanglian Zhao ([email protected])
Search for more papers by this authorTomaso de Cola
Institute of Communications and Navigation, German Aerospace Center, Wessling, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorHangsheng Zhao
School of Telecommunication and Information Engineering, Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing, China
Search for more papers by this authorFunding: This study was funded by the Unveiling and Leading Project of Nanjing University Integrated Research and Development Platform of Ministry of Education and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (62131012).
ABSTRACT
Space-to-ground laser communication (SGLC) utilizes laser beams to establish high-capacity bidirectional links between satellites and ground stations (GSs). However, its performance is significantly impaired by cloud cover and atmospheric turbulence. In practical SGLC downlink scheduling, uncertainties derived from such atmospheric conditions are inevitable. To the best of our knowledge, this work is the first to tackle downlink scheduling for SGLC under such uncertainties, with the objective of maximizing the total amount of data downloaded from satellites. We present a robust formulation of the scheduling problem that incorporates multisource uncertainties through budgeted uncertainty sets, consequently transforming the original problem into a bi-level optimization one with conflicting objectives. To address such problems, we first utilize McCormick envelopes to linearize bilinear terms in the inner optimization problem. We subsequently propose a KKT condition-based method to convert the bi-level structure into a single-level reformulation, which is further transformed into a tractable mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) model. Compared with the existing method, which does not consider such uncertainties, the proposed approach achieves robust scheduling strategies with respect to data throughput.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
- 1M. Toyoshima, “Recent Trends in Space Laser Communications for Small Satellites and Constellations,” Journal of Lightwave Technology 39, no. 3 (2021): 693–699, https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2020.3009505.
- 2X. Li, F. Fan, H. Yu, et al., “A Bidirectional Multi-Format/Rate-Adjustable Integrated Laser Communication System for Satellite Communication,” IEEE Photonics Journal 16, no. 2 (2024): 1–6, https://doi.org/10.1109/JPHOT.2024.3366805.
- 3S. Gong, H. Shen, K. Zhao, et al., “Network Availability Maximization for Free-Space Optical Satellite Communications,” IEEE Wireless Communications Letters 9, no. 3 (2020): 411–415, https://doi.org/10.1109/LWC.2019.2958804.
- 4M. Li, Y. Hong, C. Zeng, Y. Song, and X. Zhang, “Investigation on the UAV-to-Satellite Optical Communication Systems,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 36, no. 9 (2018): 2128–2138, https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2018.2864419.
- 5O. Kodheli, E. Lagunas, N. Maturo, et al., “Satellite Communications in the New Space Era: A Survey and Future Challenges,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 23, no. 1 (2021): 70–109, https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2020.3028247.
- 6H. Sandalidis, “Performance Analysis of a Laser Ground-Station-to-Satellite Link With Modulated Gamma-Distributed Irradiance Fluctuations,” Journal of Optical Communications and Networking 2, no. 11 (2010): 938–943, https://doi.org/10.1364/JOCN.2.000938.
- 7J. Liang, A. U. Chaudhry, E. Erdogan, et al., “Free-Space Optical (FSO) Satellite Networks Performance Analysis: Transmission Power, Latency, and Outage Probability,” IEEE Open Journal of Vehicular Technology 5 (2024): 244–261, https://doi.org/10.1109/OJVT.2023.3341409.
- 8D. Bushuev, D. Kedar, and S. Arnon, “Analyzing the Performance of a Nanosatellite Cluster-Detector Array Receiver for Laser Communication,” Journal of Lightwave Technology 21, no. 2 (2003): 447–455, https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2003.808770.
- 9C. N. Efrem and A. D. Panagopoulos, “Globally Optimal Selection of Ground Stations in Satellite Systems With Site Diversity,” IEEE Wireless Communications Letters 9, no. 7 (2020): 1101–1104, https://doi.org/10.1109/LWC.2020.2982139.
- 10N. K. Lyras, C. N. Efrem, C. I. Kourogiorgas, and A. D. Panagopoulos, “Optimum Monthly Based Selection of Ground Stations for Optical Satellite Networks,” IEEE Communications Letters 22, no. 6 (2018): 1192–1195, https://doi.org/10.1109/LCOMM.2018.2819174.
- 11R. Boddeda, D. R. Arrieta, S. Almonacil, J. Renaudier, and S. Bigo, “Achievable Capacity of Geostationary-Ground Optical Links,” Journal of Lightwave Technology 41, no. 12 (2023): 3717–3725, https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2023.3271824.
- 12S. C. Spangelo, J. W. Cutler, A. T. Klesh, and D. R. Boone, “Models and Tools to Evaluate Space Communication Network Capacity,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems 48, no. 3 (2012): 2387–2404, https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2012.6237598.
- 13M. Hu, X. Meng, K. Zhao, W. Li, and Y. Fang, “ Cloud Mask Prediction via Deep Learning for Satellite-Ground Laser Communication,” in 2024 IEEE/CIC International Conference on Communications in China (ICCC), (2024): 260–265, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCC62479.2024.10682046.
10.1109/ICCC62479.2024.10682046 Google Scholar
- 14S. Hooda, M. Gupta, R. Singh, and S. P. Ojha, “Retrieval of Atmospheric Water Vapor Profiles From Cosmic-2 Radio Occultation Constellation Using Machine Learning,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 61 (2023): 1–7, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2023.3331187.
- 15M. Muataz Abdulwahid, S. Kurnaz, A. Kurnaz Türkben, M. R. Hayal, E. E. Elsayed, and D. Aslonqulovich Juraev, “Inter-Satellite Optical Wireless Communication (IS-OWC) Trends: A Review, Challenges and Opportunities,” Engineering Applications 3, no. 1 (2024): 1–15, https://publish.mersin.edu.tr/index.php/enap/article/view/1347.
- 16H. Yu, L. Li, Y. Hou, et al., “Deep Learning-Based Prediction of Atmospheric Turbulence Toward Satellite-to-Ground Laser Communication,” Optics Letters 50, no. 2 (2025): 273–276, https://opg.optica.org/ol/abstract.cfm?URI=ol-50-2-273.
- 17S. Gong, H. Shen, K. Zhao, et al., “Toward Optimized Network Capacity in Emerging Integrated Terrestrial-Satellite Networks,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems 56, no. 1 (2020): 263–275, https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2019.2915415.
- 18S. Spangelo, J. Cutler, K. Gilson, and A. Cohn, “Optimization-Based Scheduling for the Single-Satellite, Multi-Ground Station Communication Problem,” Computers & Operations Research 57, no. may (2015): 1–16.
10.1016/j.cor.2014.11.004 Google Scholar
- 19J. Castaing, “ Scheduling Downloads for Multi-Satellite Multi-Ground Station Missions,” in Proc. Small Satellite Conf., Logan, UT, USA, (2014): 1–12.
- 20W. Jianjiang, H. Xuejun, and H. Chuan, “Reactive Scheduling of Multiple EOSS Under Cloud Uncertainties: Model and Algorithms,” Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics 32, no. 1 (2021): 163–177, https://doi.org/10.23919/JSEE.2021.000015.
10.23919/JSEE.2021.000015 Google Scholar
- 21R. Zhang, S. Zhang, Z. Zhao, Z. Wu, C. Lu, and L. Lin, “Phase Turbulence Prediction Method for Line-of-Sight Multiple-Input Multiple-Output Links Caused by Atmospheric Environment,” IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 21, no. 9 (2022): 1867–1871, https://doi.org/10.1109/LAWP.2022.3183439.
- 22R. Lu, T. Ding, B. Qin, J. Ma, X. Fang, and Z. Dong, “Multi-Stage Stochastic Programming to Joint Economic Dispatch for Energy and Reserve With Uncertain Renewable Energy,” IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy 11, no. 3 (2020): 1140–1151, https://doi.org/10.1109/TSTE.2019.2918269.
- 23S. Talari, M. Shafie-khah, F. Wang, J. Aghaei, and J. P. S. Catalão, “Optimal Scheduling of Demand Response in Pre-Emptive Markets Based on Stochastic Bilevel Programming Method,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 66, no. 2 (2019): 1453–1464, https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2017.2786288.
- 24M. Carrion, J. M. Arroyo, and N. Alguacil, “Vulnerability-Constrained Transmission Expansion Planning: A Stochastic Programming Approach,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 22, no. 4 (2007): 1436–1445, https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2007.907139.
- 25Z. Chu, Z. Zhu, and J. Hussein, “Robust Optimization for an-Aided Transmission and Power Splitting for Secure MISO Swipt System,” IEEE Communications Letters 20, no. 8 (2016): 1571–1574, https://doi.org/10.1109/LCOMM.2016.2572684.
- 26Q. Wang, J.-P. Watson, and Y. Guan, “Two-Stage Robust Optimization for n-k Contingency-Constrained Unit Commitment,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 28, no. 3 (2013): 2366–2375, https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2013.2244619.
- 27P. Du, B. Li, Q. Zeng, D. Zhai, D. Zhou, and L. Ran, “Distributionally Robust Two-Stage Energy Management for Hybrid Energy Powered Cellular Networks,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 69, no. 10 (2020): 12162–12174, https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2020.3013877.
- 28L. Dundun, C. Haozhong, L. Jia, Z. Pingliang, Z. Jianping, and L. Jianzhong, “A Review and Future Perspectives on Robust Transmission Network Planning,” Power System Technology 43, no. 1 (2019): 135–143, https://doi.org/10.13335/j.1000-3673.pst.2018.1351.
10.13335/j.1000?3673.pst.2018.1351 Google Scholar
- 29Y. Danwen, Y. Ming, Z. Hefeng, and H. Xueshan, “A Comprehensive Review on Robust Optimization Applications in Power System Dispatch Decision-Making,” Automation of Electric Power Systems 40, no. 7 (2016): 134–143, 148.
- 30D.-Y. Liao and Y.-T. Yang, “Imaging Order Scheduling of an Earth Observation Satellite,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews) 37, no. 5 (2007): 794–802, https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCC.2007.900668.
- 31J. Wang, E. Demeulemeester, and D. Qiu, “A Pure Proactive Scheduling Algorithm for Multiple Earth Observation Satellites Under Uncertainties of Clouds,” Computers & Operations Research 74 (2016): 1–13, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2016.04.014.
- 32J. Wang, E. Demeulemeester, X. Hu, D. Qiu, and J. Liu, “Exact and Heuristic Scheduling Algorithms for Multiple Earth Observation Satellites Under Uncertainties of Clouds,” IEEE Systems Journal 13, no. 3 (2019): 3556–3567, https://doi.org/10.1109/JSYST.2018.2874223.
- 33J. Wang, E. Demeulemeester, X. Hu, and G. Wu, “Expectation and SAA Models and Algorithms for Scheduling of Multiple Earth Observation Satellites Under the Impact of Clouds,” IEEE Systems Journal 14, no. 4 (2020): 5451–5462, https://doi.org/10.1109/JSYST.2019.2961236.
- 34T. Algra, “ On the Effectiveness of Cloud Cover Avoidance Methods in Support of the Super-Spectral Mission for Land Applications,” in IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Vol. 2, (2002): 982–985 vol.2, https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2002.1025750.
10.1109/IGARSS.2002.1025750 Google Scholar
- 35W.-C. Lin, D.-Y. Liao, C.-Y. Liu, and Y.-Y. Lee, “Daily Imaging Scheduling of an Earth Observation Satellite,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans 35, no. 2 (2005): 213–223, https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCA.2005.843380.
- 36W.-C. Lin and D.-Y. Liao, “ A Tabu Search Algorithm for Satellite Imaging Scheduling,” in 2004 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (IEEE cat. no.04ch37583), Vol. 2, (2004): 1601–1606, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSMC.2004.1399860.
10.1109/ICSMC.2004.1399860 Google Scholar
- 37W.-C. Lin and S.-C. Chang, “ Hybrid Algorithms for Satellite Imaging Scheduling,” in 2005 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Vol. 3, (2005): 2518–2523, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSMC.2005.1571527.
10.1109/ICSMC.2005.1571527 Google Scholar
- 38X. Wang, G. Song, R. Leus, and C. Han, “Robust Earth Observation Satellite Scheduling With Uncertainty of Cloud Coverage,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems 56, no. 3 (2020): 2450–2461, https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2019.2947978.
- 39W. Jianjiang, H. Xuejun, and H. Chuan, “Reactive Scheduling of Multiple EOSS Under Cloud Uncertainties: Model and Algorithms,” Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics 32, no. 1 (2021): 163–177, https://doi.org/10.23919/JSEE.2021.000015.
10.23919/JSEE.2021.000015 Google Scholar
- 40B. Zeng, H. Dong, R. Sioshansi, F. Xu, and M. Zeng, “Bilevel Robust Optimization of Electric Vehicle Charging Stations With Distributed Energy Resources,” IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications 56, no. 5 (2020): 5836–5847, https://doi.org/10.1109/TIA.2020.2984741.
- 41F. Fang, S. Yu, and X. Xin, “Data-Driven-Based Stochastic Robust Optimization for a Virtual Power Plant With Multiple Uncertainties,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 37, no. 1 (2022): 456–466, https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2021.3091879.
- 42B. Park, Y. Chen, M. Olama, et al., “Optimal Demand Response Incorporating Distribution LMP With PV Generation Uncertainty,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 37, no. 2 (2022): 982–995, https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2021.3107671.
- 43M. J. Feizollahi, R. Soltani, and H. Feyzollahi, “The Robust Cold Standby Redundancy Allocation in Series-Parallel Systems With Budgeted Uncertainty,” IEEE Transactions on Reliability 64, no. 2 (2015): 799–806, https://doi.org/10.1109/TR.2015.2416214.
- 44M. Li, “Generalized Lagrange Multiplier Method and KKT Conditions With an Application to Distributed Optimization,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs 66, no. 2 (2019): 252–256, https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSII.2018.2842085.
10.1109/TCSII.2018.2842085 Google Scholar
- 45A. Miró, C. Pozo, G. Guillén-Gosélbez, J. A. Egea, and L. Jiménez, “Deterministic Global Optimization Algorithm Based on Outer Approximation for the Parameter Estimation of Nonlinear Dynamic Biological Systems,” BMC Bioinformatics 13, no. 1 (2012): 90–90.
- 46J. K. Scott, M. D. Stuber, and P. I. Barton, “Generalized McCormick Relaxations,” Journal of Global Optimization 51, no. 4 (2011): 569–606.
- 47P. M. Castro, “Tightening Piecewise McCormick Relaxations for Bilinear Problems,” Computers & Chemical Engineering 72 (2014): 300–311.
10.1016/j.compchemeng.2014.03.025 Google Scholar