Volume 21, Issue 1 pp. 1-17
Research Article

Internal Migration Data Around the World: Assessing Contemporary Practice

Martin Bell

Corresponding Author

Martin Bell

Queensland Centre for Population Research, The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia

Correspondence to: Martin Bell, Queensland Centre for Population Research, The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia.

E-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Elin Charles-Edwards

Elin Charles-Edwards

Queensland Centre for Population Research, The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Dorota Kupiszewska

Dorota Kupiszewska

International Organization for Migration, Warsaw, Poland

Search for more papers by this author
Marek Kupiszewski

Marek Kupiszewski

Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland

Search for more papers by this author
John Stillwell

John Stillwell

School of Geography, The University of Leeds, Leeds, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Yu Zhu

Yu Zhu

Center for Population and Development Research, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou, China

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 12 March 2014
Citations: 94

Abstract

Compared with other demographic processes, little attention has been given to the way levels and patterns of internal migration vary around the world. This can be traced in part to the absence of any central repository of internal migration data, but it also reflects widespread variation in the ways migration is measured. If robust, reliable comparisons between countries are to be made, a clear understanding of the available data is an essential pre-requisite. This paper reports results from the Internal Migration Around the GlobE project, which established an inventory of internal migration data collections for the 193 UN member States, identifying, inter alia, the types of data collected, the intervals over which it is measured and the spatial frameworks employed. Results reveal substantial diversity in data collection practice. We assess the strengths, limitations, and utility of the six principle ways migration is measured and examine their capacity to address key questions and issues in the field. We also identify avenues for harmonisation and conclude with recommendations which aim to facilitate cross-national comparisons. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.