Volume 83, Issue 1 pp. 39-43
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate in men on active surveillance for prostate cancer with refractory lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to enlarged prostates

Jared P. Schober MD

Jared P. Schober MD

Department of Urology, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Institute of Urology, Burlington, Massachusetts, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Kristian D. Stensland MD, MPH

Kristian D. Stensland MD, MPH

Department of Urology, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Institute of Urology, Burlington, Massachusetts, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Alireza Moinzadeh MD, MHL

Alireza Moinzadeh MD, MHL

Department of Urology, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Institute of Urology, Burlington, Massachusetts, USA

Search for more papers by this author
David Canes MD

David Canes MD

Department of Urology, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Institute of Urology, Burlington, Massachusetts, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Jessica Mandeville MD

Corresponding Author

Jessica Mandeville MD

Department of Urology, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Institute of Urology, Burlington, Massachusetts, USA

Correspondence Jessica Mandeville, MD, Department of Urology, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, 41 Mall Rd, Burlington, MA 01805, USA. 

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 05 September 2022
Citations: 4

Abstract

Introduction

The surgical treatment of men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and significantly enlarged symptomatic prostates on active surveillance (AS) for low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) is not well defined. We report our single-institution initial experience with holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) for LUTS in men with low-risk PCa being managed with AS.

Materials and Methods

Men on AS who underwent HoLEP between 2013 and 2019 were identified. Data regarding preoperative cancer workup, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), perioperative outcomes, and voiding parameters were analyzed. Postoperative surveillance for PCa including PSA nadir, prostate magnetic resonance imaging, prostate biopsy (PBx), and PSA at last follow-up were evaluated.

Results

Twenty men met the inclusion criteria. Preoperative mean max flow 7.9 ml/s, median postvoid residual 101 cc, and mean transrectal ultrasound prostate size 99 cc. Patients had a median adjusted preoperative PSA of 8.5 (interquartile range [IQR]: 4.8–13.2) ng/ml. Mean resected tissue weight was 65.5 g with improved postoperative flow rate and significantly decreased residual. A total of 5/20 men had PCa in the specimen (all Gleason Grade Group 1). The median postoperative PSA nadir was 1.2 (IQR: 0.5–1.8) ng/ml at median of 5 months. At the last follow-up (median 18.5 months, IQR: 10.5–37.8), the median postoperative PSA was 1.4 (IQR: 0.63–2.48) ng/ml. Nine men underwent postoperative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) with the identification of a new prostate imaging reporting and data system 5 lesion in one patient who underwent negative fusion biopsy. Five men underwent post-HoLEP PBx with progression in two patients, who both successfully underwent radical prostatectomy.

Conclusions

Men on AS for low-risk PCa can safely undergo HoLEP with significantly improved voiding parameters. Postoperative monitoring with PSA, mpMRI, and PBx can detect disease progression requiring definitive treatment. Further research is needed to optimize surveillance strategies and long-term cancer-specific outcomes.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Raw data were generated at Lahey Hospital and Medical Center. Derived data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author (Jessica Mandeville) upon request.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.