Volume 55, Issue 3 pp. 646-648
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

The effects of high-frequency chest compression on end-tidal CO2

Gabriel A. Weiner

Gabriel A. Weiner

Division of Pulmonary Medicine, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Search for more papers by this author
Erick Forno MD MPH

Erick Forno MD MPH

Division of Pulmonary Medicine, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Search for more papers by this author
Daniel J. Weiner MD

Corresponding Author

Daniel J. Weiner MD

Division of Pulmonary Medicine, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Correspondence Daniel J. Weiner, Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 4401 Penn Avenue, 3rd Floor, AOB, Pittsburgh, PA 15224.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 25 November 2019
Citations: 2

Abstract

Introduction

High-frequency chest compression (HFCC) is used for airway clearance, but may have other effects. We sought to determine if HFCC provides augmented ventilation.

Methods

During treatment, capnometry was measured with the HFCC vest set to 6-20 Hz. End-tidal CO2 (etCO2) was compared using generalized estimating equations.

Results

Twenty-four measurements were obtained from 15 subjects with mean age 15.2 ± 2.5 years and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) % predicted 70 ± 23. EtCO2 decreased with HFCC at 6 Hz when compared with baseline (P < .001), with small changes with increasing oscillation frequency. Change in etCO2 was not predicted by FEV1, body mass index, age, or sex.

Conclusions

While HFCC has been shown to be a suitable method of airway clearance, investigators have failed to demonstrate differences between techniques. Assessment of these methodologies will become important as new airway clearance devices are proposed. Other outcome measures (besides FEV1) may be needed to assess effects of airway clearance, and we propose that physiologic measures might be one such measure which deserves further exploration.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.