Volume 58, Issue 4 pp. 503-512
Review

Systematic review of psychosocial morbidities among bereaved parents of children with cancer

Abby R. Rosenberg MD

Corresponding Author

Abby R. Rosenberg MD

Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington

University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Division of Hematology/Oncology, Seattle Children's Hospital, M/S B-6553, PO Box 5371, Seattle 98105, Washington.===Search for more papers by this author
K. Scott Baker MD, MS

K. Scott Baker MD, MS

Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington

University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Search for more papers by this author
Karen Syrjala PhD

Karen Syrjala PhD

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington

University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Search for more papers by this author
Joanne Wolfe MD, MPH

Joanne Wolfe MD, MPH

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Maryland

Children's Hospital, Boston, Maryland

Harvard Medical School, Boston, Maryland

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 28 October 2011
Citations: 127

Abstract

The objective of this review was to comprehensively summarize existing studies utilizing validated instruments to measure psychosocial outcomes among bereaved parents of children with cancer. This population has increased risks of anxiety, depression, prolonged grief, and poor quality of life. Parental morbidity is associated with psychiatric co-morbidities, prior loss, economic hardship, duration, and intensity of child's cancer-therapy, perceptions of medical care, child's quality of life, preparedness for and location of the child's death. Rigorous, prospective research is needed to identify risk-groups, define outcomes, and design interventions which will improve parental outcomes after the death of a child due to cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2012; 58: 503–512. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.