Compressive properties of magnetorheological elastomer with different magnetic fields and types of filler
Jin Yong Lee
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan, Republic of Korea
Search for more papers by this authorVineet Kumar
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan, Republic of Korea
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Dong-Joo Lee
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan, Republic of Korea
Correspondence
Dong-Joo Lee, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan, Republic of Korea.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorJin Yong Lee
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan, Republic of Korea
Search for more papers by this authorVineet Kumar
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan, Republic of Korea
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Dong-Joo Lee
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan, Republic of Korea
Correspondence
Dong-Joo Lee, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan, Republic of Korea.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Magnetorheological elastomer (MRE) specimens were prepared to find the optimum compressive characteristics using different types and amounts of iron powder. A magnetic field of up to 2 T was applied during vulcanization. Among the four types of iron powders, the specimen with round-shaped carbonyl iron powder and small grain size shows higher magnetic effects than that with bigger and irregularly shaped electrolyte iron powder. However, the compressive modulus of the rubber with electrolyte iron powder is higher without magnetic treatment at a given amount. In general, the bigger and irregularly shaped iron particles tend to move slowly and produce nonuniform distribution when a magnetic field is applied. The experimental results show that the mechanical properties are better when applying a magnetic field of 1.5 T compared with 2.0 T during the specimen vulcanization. Applying a magnetic field of 300 mT during the compression test enhanced the compressive modulus by 12% to 15%. The rate of increase of the modulus decreased exponentially with prestrain.
REFERENCES
- 1Farshad M, Le RM. Compression properties of magnetostrictive polymer composite gels. Polym Test. 2005; 24(2): 163-168.
- 2Borcea L, Bruno O. On the magneto-elastic properties of elastomer–ferromagnet composites. J Mech Phys Solids. 2001; 49(12): 2877-2919.
- 3Ginder JM, Nichols ME, Elie LD, Clark SM. Controllable-stiffness components based on magnetorheological elastomers. Proceedings of the SPIE. 2000; 3985: 418-426.
- 4Kela L, Vahaoja P. Recent studies of adaptive tuned vibration absorbers/neutralizers. Appl Mech Rev. 2009; 62(6):060801): 1-9.
- 5Koo JH, Goncalves FD, Ahmadian M. A comprehensive analysis of the response time of MR dampers. Smart Mater Struct. 2006; 15(2): 351-358.
- 6Lu SB, Li YN, Choi SB, Zheng L, Seong MS. Ntegrated control on MR vehicle suspension system associated with braking and steering control. Veh Syst Dyn. 2011; 49(1–2): 361-380.
- 7Fan YC, Gong XL, Xuan SH, Zhang W, Zheng JA, Jiang WQ, 2011; 20(3): 5007.
- 8Kim SH, Cherney EA, Hackam R. Effects of filler level in RTV silicone rubber coatings used in HV insulators. IEEE Trans Electr Insul. 1982; 27(6): 1065-1072.
10.1109/14.204855 Google Scholar
- 9Kumar V, Lee DJ. Studies of nanocomposites based on carbon nanomaterials and RTV silicone rubber. J Appl Polym Sci. 2017; 134(1–9): 44407.
- 10Kumar V, Lee DJ, Lee JY. Studies of RTV silicone rubber nanocomposites based on graphitic nanofillers. Polym Test. 2016; 56: 369-378.
- 11Lee JY, Kumar V, Tang XW, Lee DJ. Mechanical and electrical behavior of rubber nanocomposites under static and cyclic strain. Compos Sci Technol. 2017; 142: 1-9.
- 12Kumar V, Lee JY, Lee DJ. Synergistic effects of hybrid carbon nanomaterials in room-temperature-vulcanized silicone rubber. Polym Int. 2017; 66(3): 450-458.
- 13Kumar V, Lee DJ. Effects of thinner on RTV silicone rubber nanocomposites reinforced with GR and CNTs. Polym Adv Technol. 2017; 28(12): 1842-1850.
- 14Kumar V, Lee DJ. Iron particle and anisotropic effects on mechanical properties of magneto-sensitive elastomers. J Mag Mag Mater. 2017; 441: 105-112.
- 15Yu M, Ju B, Fu J, Liu X, Yang Q. Influence of composition of carbonyl iron particles on dynamic mechanical properties of magnetorheological elastomers. J Mag Mag Mater. 2012; 324(13): 2147-2152.
- 16Ryu SR, Lee DJ, Lee JH. Effect of magnetic force on the compressive and dynamic properties of magnetorheological elastomers. Compos Res J Korea. 2010; 2: 17.
- 17Wang Y, Hu Y, Chen L, et al. Effects of rubber/magnetic particle interactions on the performance of magnetorheological elastomers. Polym Test. 2006; 25(2): 262-267.
- 18Miedzińska D, Gieleta R, Osiński J. Experimental and analytical research on resonance phenomena of vibrating head with MRE regulating element. Int J App Mech Eng. 2015; 20(1): 201-208.
10.1515/ijame-2015-0014 Google Scholar
- 19Kukla M, Górecki J, Malujda I, Talaśka K, Tarkowski P. The Determination of mechanical properties of magnetorheological elastomers (MREs). Proc Eng. 2017; 177: 324-330.
10.1016/j.proeng.2017.02.233 Google Scholar
- 20Kim MS, Liu YD, Park BJ, You CY, Choi HJ. Carbonyl iron particles dispersed in a polymer solution and their rheological characteristics under applied magnetic field. J Ind Eng Chem. 2012; 18(2): 664-667.
- 21Gorodkin SR, James RO, Kordonski WI. Magnetic properties of carbonyl Iron particles in magnetorheological fluids. J Phys Conf Ser. 2009; 149. 012051
10.1088/1742-6596/149/1/012051 Google Scholar
- 22Brigadnov IA, Dorfmann A. Mathematical modeling of magneto-sensitive elastomers. Int J Solids Struct. 2003; 40(18): 4659-4674.
- 23Volkov TI, Böhm V, Kaufhold T, et al. Motion behavior of magneto-sensitive elastomers controlled by an external magnetic field for sensor applications. J Mag Mag Mater. 2017; 431: 262-265.
- 24Borin D, Gunther D, Hintze C, Heinrich G, Odenbach S. The level of cross-linking and the structure of anisotropic magnetorheological elastomers. J Mag Mag Mater. 2012; 324: 3452-3454.
- 25Bica I. The influence of the magnetic field on the elastic properties of anisotropic magnetorheological elastomers. J Ind Eng Chem. 2012; 18(5): 1666-1669.
- 26Bunoiu M, Bica I. Magnetorheological elastomer based on silicone rubber, carbonyl iron and Rochelle salt: effects of alternating electric and static magnetic fields intensities. J Ind Eng Chem. 2016; 37: 312-318.
- 27Bica I, Anitas EM, Averis LME. Tensions and deformations in composites based on polyurethane elastomer and magnetorheological suspension: effects of the magnetic field. J Ind Eng Chem. 2015; 28: 86-90.
- 28Bica I, Anitas EM, Bunoiu M, Vatzulik B, Juganaru I. Hybrid magnetorheological elastomer: influence of magnetic field and compression pressure on its electrical conductivity. J Ind Eng Chem. 2014; 20(6): 3994-3999.
- 29Schümann M, Morich J, Kaufhold T, Böhm V, Zimmermann K, Odenbach S. A mechanical characterization on multiple timescales of electro conductive magnetorheological elastomers. J Mag Mag Mater. 2018; 453: 198-205.
- 30Gorman D, Murphy N, Ekins R, Jerrams S. The evaluation of the effect of strain limits on the physical properties of magnetorheological elastomers subjected to uniaxial and biaxial cyclic testing. Int J Fatigue. 2017; 103: 1-4.
- 31Danas K, Kankanala SV, Triantafyllidis N. Experiments and modeling of iron-particle-filled magnetorheological elastomers. J Mech Phys Solids. 2012; 60(1): 120-138.
- 32Jung HS, Kwon SH, Choi HJ, Jung JH, Kim YG. Magnetic carbonyl iron/natural rubber composite elastomer and its magnetorheology. Compos Struc. 2016; 136: 106-112.
- 33An JS, Kwon SH, Choi HJ, Jung JH, Kim YG. Modified silane-coated carbonyl iron/natural rubber composite elastomer and its magnetorheological performance. Compos Struc. 2017; 160: 1020-1026.
- 34Krautz M, Werner D, Schrödner M, et al. Hysteretic behavior of soft magnetic elastomer composites. J Mag Mag Mater. 2017; 426: 60-63.
- 35Han Y, Hong W, Faidley LE. Field-stiffening effect of magneto-rheological elastomers. Int J Solids Struct. 2013; 50(14-15): 2281-2288.
- 36Aloui S, Klüppel M. Magneto-rheological response of elastomer composites with hybrid-magnetic fillers. Smart Mater Struct. 2015; 24:025016(2).
- 37Lee DJ. Fracture mechanical model for tensile strength of particle reinforced elastomeric composites. Mech Mater. 2016; 102: 54-60.
- 38Fu SY, Feng XQ, Lauke B, Mai YW. Effects of particle size, particle/matrix interface adhesion and particle loading on mechanical properties of particulate–polymer composites. Compos Part B:Eng. 2008; 39(6): 933-961.