Volume 23, Issue 1 pp. 39-47
Research Article
Free to Read

Effects of Action Observational Training Plus Brain–Computer Interface-Based Functional Electrical Stimulation on Paretic Arm Motor Recovery in Patient with Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TaeHoon Kim

TaeHoon Kim

The Post-Professional DPT Program, Stockton University, 101 Vera King Farris Drive, Galloway, NJ, 08205 USA

Search for more papers by this author
SeongSik Kim

SeongSik Kim

Graduate School of Physical Therapy, Sahmyook University, 815 Hwarang-ro, Nowon-gu, Seoul, 139-742 Korea

Search for more papers by this author
ByoungHee Lee

Corresponding Author

ByoungHee Lee

Graduate School of Physical Therapy, Sahmyook University, 815 Hwarang-ro, Nowon-gu, Seoul, 139-742 Korea

Correspondence: ByoungHee Lee, Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate School of Physical Therapy, Sahmyook University 815 Hwarang-ro, Nowon-gu, Seoul, 139–742, Korea.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 24 August 2015
Citations: 119

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether action observational training (AOT) plus brain–computer interface-based functional electrical stimulation (BCI-FES) has a positive influence on motor recovery of paretic upper extremity in patients with stroke. This was a hospital-based, randomized controlled trial with a blinded assessor. Thirty patients with a first-time stroke were randomly allocated to one of two groups: the BCI-FES group (n = 15) and the control group (n = 15). The BCI-FES group administered to AOT plus BCI-FES on the paretic upper extremity five times per week during 4 weeks while both groups received conventional therapy. The primary outcomes were the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity, Motor Activity Log (MAL), Modified Barthel Index and range of motion of paretic arm. A blinded assessor evaluated the outcomes at baseline and 4 weeks. All baseline outcomes did not differ significantly between the two groups. After 4 weeks, the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity sub-items (total, shoulder and wrist), MAL (MAL-Activity of Use and Quality of Movement), Modified Barthel Index and wrist flexion range of motion were significantly higher in the BCI-FES group (p < 0.05). AOT plus BCI-based FES is effective in paretic arm rehabilitation by improving the upper extremity performance. The motor improvements suggest that AOT plus BCI-based FES can be used as a therapeutic tool for stroke rehabilitation. The limitations of the study are that subjects had a certain limited level of upper arm function, and the sample size was comparatively small; hence, it is recommended that future large-scale trials should consider stratified and lager populations according to upper arm function. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.