Volume 17, Issue 2 pp. 73-77
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Imaging findings of pericoronal myxofibrous hyperplasia: Panoramic radiography and multidetector computed tomography

Ichiro Ogura

Corresponding Author

Ichiro Ogura

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, The Nippon Dental University School of Life Dentistry at Niigata, Niigata, Japan

Correspondence

Ichiro Ogura, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, The Nippon Dental University School of Life Dentistry at Niigata, 1-8 Hamaura-cho, Chuo-ku, Niigata, Niigata 951-8580, Japan.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Satoshi Tanaka

Satoshi Tanaka

Department of Pediatric Dentistry, The Nippon Dental University School of Life Dentistry at Niigata, Niigata, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Masutaka Mizutani

Masutaka Mizutani

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The Nippon Dental University Niigata Hospital, Niigata, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Yasuo Okada

Yasuo Okada

Department of Pathology, The Nippon Dental University School of Life Dentistry at Niigata, Niigata, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 27 January 2020

Abstract

Aims

The aim of this study was to investigate the imaging findings of pericoronal myxofibrous hyperplasia (PMH), especially panoramic radiography and multidetector computed tomography (MDCT).

Materials and methods

In all, 13 patients with PMH who underwent panoramic radiography and MDCT were included in this study. For patients with PMH, interpretation with panoramic radiography and MDCT findings were independently analyzed by two oral and maxillofacial radiologists. Any discrepancies of the imaging evaluation were resolved by consensus of the two oral and maxillofacial radiologists.

Results

Almost all cases with PMH were teenage (n = 11, 84.6%), women (n = 10, 76.9%), and maxilla (n = 9, 69.2%). Of all cases with PMH, the interpretation with panoramic radiography was as dentigerous cyst (n = 4, 30.8%) or unerupted tooth (n = 9, 69.2%). MDCT findings of all cases were expansive process around crown of impacted tooth. MDCT showed well-defined unilocular lesion and spread of lesion to better advantage than panoramic radiography. Furthermore, the CT values of PMH were 13.9 ± 3.9 HU (range, 8.4-22.0 HU).

Conclusions

The results of the present study indicate the clinical and imaging features of PMH. We believe that PMH is often misdiagnosed because of the overlap of its histological features with other odontogenic cysts or unerupted tooth.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.