Volume 37, Issue 4 pp. 1380-1385
ORIGINAL CLINICAL ARTICLE

Neobladder—Vaginal fistula: The University of Southern California experience

Shilo Rosenberg MD

Corresponding Author

Shilo Rosenberg MD

Department of Clinical Urology, Keck School of medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California

Correspondence

Shilo Rosenberg, MD, Assistant Professor Department of Clinical Urology, Keck School of medicine, University of Southern California, 1441 Eastlake Ave. Suite 7416, Los Angeles, CA 90089-2211.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Gus Miranda

Gus Miranda

USC Institute of Urology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California

Search for more papers by this author
David A. Ginsberg MD

David A. Ginsberg MD

Department of Clinical Urology, Keck School of medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 15 November 2017
Citations: 11
Roger Dmochowski led the peer-review process as the Associate Editor responsible for the paper.

Abstract

Aims

The use of orthotropic neobladder (ONB) construction in women has increased in popularity. With increasing numbers so have complications distinct to this procedure. Neobladder vaginal fistula (NVF) is a rare but challenging complication. We present our experience correcting this problem.

Methods

An IRB approved database of female patients with an ONB was retrospectively reviewed. Patients with a history of NVF were identified and charts reviewed. Our standard technique of radical cystectomy and orthotopic diversion in female patients includes interposition of omentum between the neobladder and anterior vaginal wall and sacrocolpopexy.

Results

Two hundred and forty-nine female patients underwent cystectomy and ONB construction between 1995 and 2015. Fourteen patients were diagnosed with a NVF (5.6% incidence). The average age and follow-up was 67 years and 33.7 months, respectively. Surgery for fistula closure was attempted in 13 patients. One repair was combined abdominal and transvaginal; the remaining 12 were performed transvaginally. Location of NVF was categorized as at the urethra-neobladder anastomosis (UNA, nine patients) and anterior vaginal wall (AVW, four patients). Eight patients had a successful fistula repair (61.5%) but only five patients ultimately retained their ONB (39%).

Conclusions

Patients with a NVF pose a surgical challenge. Successful fistula repair does not necessarily result in adequate continence due to an incompetent outlet. NVF location at the UNA is the more common location and is more challenging in regard to successful resolution of the NVF as well as possible urinary incontinence post-NVF repair.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.