Volume 42, Issue 4 pp. 839-848
Article
Full Access

Ghost Fishing by Abandoned Trotlines in a Simulated and Actual Reservoir

Dusty L. McDonald

Corresponding Author

Dusty L. McDonald

Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Inland Fisheries Division, Corpus Christi Fisheries Management District, Post Office Box 116, Mathis, Texas, 78368 USA

Corresponding author: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
J. Warren Schlechte

J. Warren Schlechte

Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Inland Fisheries Division, Heart of the Hills Fisheries Science Center, 5103 Junction Highway, Mountain Home, Texas, 78058 USA

Search for more papers by this author
Donovan A. Patterson

Donovan A. Patterson

Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Inland Fisheries Division, Texas Freshwater Fisheries Center, 5550 FM 2495 Athens, Texas, 75752 USA

Search for more papers by this author
Gregory R. Binion

Gregory R. Binion

Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Inland Fisheries Division, Corpus Christi Fisheries Management District, Post Office Box 116, Mathis, Texas, 78368 USA

Search for more papers by this author
Amanda Boyles

Amanda Boyles

Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Angler Education Program, 4034 Fairview Industrial Drive Southeast, Salem, Oregon, 97302 USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 27 March 2022

Abstract

Ghost fishing is described as the continuation of fishing by abandoned fishing gear. The freshwater trotline, a passive gear that is routinely found abandoned, has never been evaluated for its ability to ghost fish. We tested the effectiveness of top-water set trotlines to ghost fish in (1) a simulated reservoir (i.e., hatchery ponds) and (2) an actual reservoir. In our simulated reservoir, we exposed Channel Catfish Ictalurus punctatus to baited and bare (unbaited) hooks of two hook styles (circle and “J”) during the winter and summer seasons. We found that in the simulated reservoir, catch rates of baited hooks (mean = 18.4 fish per 24 hooks, standard error [SE] = 2.13) did not differ significantly from bare hooks (mean = 15.3 fish per 24 hooks, SE = 1.77), circle hooks were 1.5 times more effective at catching fish than “J” hooks (χ2 = 4.19, df = 1, P = 0.041), and fish were retained longer in the winter (mean = 12.7 d, SE = 0.66) compared to the summer (mean = 2.8 d, SE = 0.21). We used the actual reservoir portion to examine the long-term fishability and the overall longevity of the trotline gear during the same seasons. Catch was highest during the first week and decreased with time. Trotlines caught mostly fish (81.6%), and most catch (>68%) occurred after the initial bait was lost. Winter-set trotlines captured more organisms (11.6 per 25-hook trotline; SE = 2.05) than summer-set trotlines (5.2; SE = 0.99). Trotline longevity was assessed by counting the fishable hooks through time. Longevity differed between seasons (P = 0.0039), and winter-set trotlines lasted longer (50% hook loss at 52 d, 95% confidence interval [CI] = [49, 77]) than summer-set trotlines (32 d, 95% CI = [24, 36]). This study confirms that abandoned freshwater trotlines do ghost fish and will continue for months after they are initially set.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.