Volume 63, Issue 5 pp. 690-696
CLINICAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

Enhancing diagnostic accuracy using a side-to-side cross-sectional area ratio for the diagnosis of unilateral ulnar mononeuropathy at the elbow

Mansoureh Mamarabadi MD

Corresponding Author

Mansoureh Mamarabadi MD

Department of Neurology, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania

Correspondence

Mansoureh Mamarabadi, Department of Neurology, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, 30 Hope Drive, #1300, Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
John A. Morren MD

John A. Morren MD

Neuromuscular Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio

Search for more papers by this author
Steven J. Shook MD

Steven J. Shook MD

Neuromuscular Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 05 February 2021
Citations: 2

Part of this material was presented at the 72nd annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology, April 2020, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding information: Cleveland Clinic

Abstract

Introduction

Neuromuscular ultrasonography (NMUS) is a valuable adjunct to electrodiagnostic testing for the diagnosis of entrapment neuropathy. The aim of this study was to determine whether diagnostic accuracy of NMUS could be enhanced in patients with unilateral ulnar mononeuropathy at the elbow (UNE) by utilizing side-to-side ulnar nerve cross-sectional area (CSA) ratios.

Methods

Retrospective case-control analysis of unilateral UNE cases identified cutoff values for elbow segment ulnar nerve maximum CSA (MCSA) of the symptomatic/asymptomatic limb (M ratio), as well as side-to-side ratios comparing MCSA with ipsilateral CSA at the Guyon canal (E/G), middle forearm (E/F), and middle humerus (E/H). Diagnostic accuracy values were calculated.

Results

The optimal M-ratio cut-off was 1.22 (sensitivity, 92.9%; specificity, 97.8%; accuracy, 95.4%). Optimal cutoffs for inter-E/G, -E/F, and -E/H ratios were 1.07 (sensitivity, 98%; specificity, 78%; accuracy, 87.7%), 1.11 (sensitivity, 95%; specificity, 80%; accuracy, 87.2%), and 1.18 (sensitivity, 95%; specificity, 93%; accuracy, 94%), respectively.

Discussion

The M ratio and inter-E/H ratio exhibited high diagnostic accuracy for unilateral UNE. Prospective studies are needed to compare the accuracy of the new measures with a single MCSA measurement.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

click me