Prospective study of positive factors for improvement of carpal tunnel syndrome in pregnant women
Corresponding Author
Mauro Mondelli MD
EMG Service, Local Health District 7, Via Pian d'Ovile 9, 53100 Siena, Italy
EMG Service, Local Health District 7, Via Pian d'Ovile 9, 53100 Siena, ItalySearch for more papers by this authorStefania Rossi PhD
Department of Pathophysiology, Experimental Medicine and Public Health, Siena University, Siena, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorElena Monti MD
Obstetrics and Gynaecology Service, Local Health District 7, Siena, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorIrene Aprile MD
Department of Neurology, Catholic University and “don Gnocchi” Foundation, Rome, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorPietro Caliandro MD
Department of Neurology, Catholic University and “don Gnocchi” Foundation, Rome, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorCostanza Pazzaglia MD
Department of Neurology, Catholic University and “don Gnocchi” Foundation, Rome, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorClara Romano MD
Department of Clinical Medicine and Immunological Sciences, Siena University, Siena, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorLuca Padua MD, PhD
Department of Neurology, Catholic University and “don Gnocchi” Foundation, Rome, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Mauro Mondelli MD
EMG Service, Local Health District 7, Via Pian d'Ovile 9, 53100 Siena, Italy
EMG Service, Local Health District 7, Via Pian d'Ovile 9, 53100 Siena, ItalySearch for more papers by this authorStefania Rossi PhD
Department of Pathophysiology, Experimental Medicine and Public Health, Siena University, Siena, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorElena Monti MD
Obstetrics and Gynaecology Service, Local Health District 7, Siena, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorIrene Aprile MD
Department of Neurology, Catholic University and “don Gnocchi” Foundation, Rome, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorPietro Caliandro MD
Department of Neurology, Catholic University and “don Gnocchi” Foundation, Rome, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorCostanza Pazzaglia MD
Department of Neurology, Catholic University and “don Gnocchi” Foundation, Rome, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorClara Romano MD
Department of Clinical Medicine and Immunological Sciences, Siena University, Siena, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorLuca Padua MD, PhD
Department of Neurology, Catholic University and “don Gnocchi” Foundation, Rome, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
The aims of this study were to evaluate differences between women with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and symptom onset in pregnancy (pregnancy cohort) and women with idiopathic CTS (control cohort) and to report changes in symptoms assessed by the Levine Boston Questionnaire (BQ) administered by phone 3 years after diagnosis. Forty-five pregnant women with CTS (mean age 32 ± 3.9 years) and 90 age-matched women with idiopathic CTS were consecutively enrolled. Diagnosis was based on clinical findings and abnormal transcarpal median nerve conduction. Univariate analysis showed that the pregnancy cohort had a shorter duration of symptoms, higher frequency of bilateral symptoms and non–blue-collar workers, and lower clinical and electrophysiological severity evaluated by ordinal scales and BQ scores. Multivariate analysis showed that the pregnancy cohort had a probability of improvement of symptoms 3–4 times greater than the control cohort. The need for further treatment depended on BQ functional score; 50% of pregnant women had tolerable CTS symptoms and 85% did not require further treatment 3 years after diagnosis, whereas 72% of women in the control cohort did not require long-term therapy. The probability of need for CTS treatment did not depend on the cohort, but only on the severity of hand disability. Muscle Nerve, 2007
REFERENCES
- 1 American Academy of Neurology. Practice parameter for carpal tunnel syndrome (summary statement): report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 1993; 43: 2406–2409.
- 2 American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine, American Academy of Neurology, American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Practice parameter for electrodiagnostic studies in carpal tunnel syndrome: summary statement. Muscle Nerve 2002; 25: 918–922.
- 3 Bahrami MH, Rayegani SM, Fereidouni M, Baghbani M. Prevalence and severity of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) during pregnancy. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 2005; 45: 123–125.
- 4 Colombini D, Occhipinti E, Cairoli S, Battevi N, Menoni O, Ricci MG, et al. Musculoskeletal conditions of the upper and lower limbs as an occupational disease: what kind and under what conditions. Consensus document of a national working-group (ISPESL). Med Lav 2003; 94: 312–329.
- 5 Courts RB. Splinting for symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome during pregnancy. J Hand Ther 1995; 8: 31–34.
- 6 Ekman-Ordeberg G, Salgeback S, Ordeberg G. Carpal tunnel syndrome in pregnancy. A prospective study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1987; 66: 233–235.
- 7 Eogan M, O'Brien C, Carolan D, Fynes M, O'Herlihy C. Median and ulnar nerve conduction in pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2004; 87: 233–236.
- 8 Finsen V, Russwurm H. Neurophysiology not required before surgery for typical carpal tunnel syndrome, J Hand Surg 2001; 26B: 61–64.
- 9 Finsen V, Zeitlmann H. Carpal tunnel syndrome during pregnancy. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 2006; 40: 41–45.
- 10 Giannini F, Cioni R, Mondelli M, Padua R, Gregori B, D'Amico P, et al. A new clinical scale of carpal tunnel syndrome: validation of the measurement and clinical-neurophysiological assessment. Clin Neurophysiol 2002; 113: 71–77.
- 11 Gould JS, Wissinger HA. Carpal tunnel syndrome in pregnancy. South Med J 1978; 71: 144–145, 154.
- 12 Layton KB. Acroparaesthesia in pregnancy and the carpal tunnel syndrome. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp 1958; 65: 823–825.
- 13 Levine DW, Simmons BP, Koris MJ, Daltroy LH, Hohl GG, Fossel AH, et al. A self-administered questionnaire for the assessment of severity of symptoms and functional status in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg 1993; 75A: 1585–1592.
- 14 McLennan HG, Oats JN, Walstab JE. Survey of hand symptoms in pregnancy. Med J Aust 1987; 147: 542–544.
- 15 Melvin JL, Burnett CN, Johnson EW. Median nerve conduction in pregnancy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1969; 50: 75–80.
- 16 Mondelli M, Giannini F, Giacchi M. Carpal tunnel syndrome incidence in a general population. Neurology 2002; 58: 289–294.
- 17 Mondelli M, Ginanneschi F, Rossi S, Reale F, Padua L, Giannini F. Inter-observer reproducibility and responsiveness of a clinical severity scale in surgically treated carpal tunnel syndrome. Acta Neurol Scand 2002; 106: 263–268.
- 18 Nicholas GG, Noone RB, Graham WP. Carpal tunnel syndrome in pregnancy. Hand 1971; 3: 80–83.
- 19 Padua L, Aprile I, Caliandro P, Carboni T, Meloni A, Massi S, et al. Symptoms and neurophysiological picture of carpal tunnel syndrome in pregnancy. Clin Neurophysiol 2001; 112: 1946–1951.
- 20 Padua L, Aprile I, Caliandro P, Mondelli M, Pasqualetti P, Tonali PA. Carpal tunnel syndrome in pregnancy: multiperspective follow-up of untreated cases. Neurology 2002; 59: 1643–1646.
- 21 Padua L, LoMonaco M, Gregori B, Valente EM, Padua R, Tonali P. Neurophysiological classification and sensitivity in 500 carpal tunnel syndrome hands. Acta Neurol Scand 1997; 96: 211–217.
- 22 Padua L, Padua R, Aprile I, Pasqualetti P, Tonali P. Carpal tunnel syndrome. Multiperspective follow-up of untreated carpal tunnel syndrome: a multicenter study. Neurology 2001; 56: 1459–1466.
- 23 Padua L, Pasqualetti P, Rosenbaum R. One patient, two carpal tunnels: statistical and clinical analysis — by hand or by patient? Clin Neurophysiol 2005; 116: 241–243.
- 24 Padua R, Padua L, Romanini E, Aulisa L, Lupparelli S, Sanguinetti C. Versione italiana del questionario “Boston carpal tunnel”: valutazione preliminare. Giorn Ital Ortop Traumatol 1998; 24: 121–129.
- 25 Rempel D, Evanoff B, Amadio PC, de Krom M, Franklin G, Franzblau A, et al. Consensus criteria for the classification of carpal tunnel syndrome in epidemiologic studies. Am J Public Health 1998; 88: 1447–1451.
- 26 Sax TW, Rosenbaum RB. Neuromuscular disorders in pregnancy. Muscle Nerve 2006; 34: 559–71.
- 27 Seror P. Pregnancy-related carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg 1998; 23B: 98–101.
- 28 Soferman N, Weissman SL, Haimov M. Acroparesthesias in pregnancy. Am J Obst Gynec 1964; 89: 528–531.
- 29 Stahl S, Blumenfeld Z, Yarnitsky D. Carpal tunnel syndrome in pregnancy: indications for early surgery. J Neurol Sci 1996; 136: 182–184.
- 30 Stolp-Smith KA, Pascoe MK, Ogburn PL Jr. Carpal tunnel syndrome in pregnancy: frequency, severity, and prognosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998; 79: 1285–1287.
- 31 Tobin SM. Carpal tunnel syndrome in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1967; 97: 493–498.
- 32 Turgut F, Cetinsahinahin M, Turgut M, Bolukbasi O. The management of carpal tunnel syndrome in pregnancy. J Clin Neurosci 2001; 8: 332–334.
- 33 Voitk AJ, Mueller JC, Farlinger DE, Johnston RU. Carpal tunnel syndrome in pregnancy. Can Med Assoc J 1983; 128: 277–281.
- 34 Wallace JT, Cook AW. Carpal tunnel syndrome in pregnancy: a report of two cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1957; 73: 1333–1336.
- 35 Wand JS. Carpal tunnel syndrome in pregnancy and lactation. J Hand Surg 1990; 15B: 93–95.
- 36 Weimer LH, Yin J, Lovelace RE, Gooch CL. Serial studies of carpal tunnel syndrome during and after pregnancy. Muscle Nerve 2002; 25: 914–917.
- 37 Wilkinson M. The CTS in pregnancy. Lancet 1960; 1: 453–454.