Volume 16, Issue 2 pp. 278-286
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Experiences of a patient-initiated self-monitoring service in inflammatory arthritis: A qualitative exploration

Hayley McBain

Corresponding Author

Hayley McBain

School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK

Correspondence

Dr Hayley McBain, School of Health Sciences, City University London, Northampton Square, London, EC1V 0HB, UK.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Stanton Newman

Stanton Newman

School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Michael Shipley

Michael Shipley

Centre for Rheumatology, University College London Hospital, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Abigail Olaleye

Abigail Olaleye

Centre for Rheumatology, University College London Hospital, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Samantha Moore

Samantha Moore

Centre for Rheumatology, University College London Hospital, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 30 January 2018
Citations: 7
The study was funded by UCLH Charity, specifically the Otto Beit Fund and the Shipley-Rudge Fund.

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of the present study was to explore patients' experience of a patient-initiated self-monitoring service for people with rheumatoid or psoriatic arthritis who are on methotrexate.

Methods

The study took the form of qualitative semi-structured interviews, embedded within a randomized controlled trial. Twelve participants who were randomly assigned to the intervention arm were interviewed. Interviews digitally, transcribed verbatim and analysed using inductive thematic analysis. The study received full National Health Service ethics approval from Camden and Islington Community Local Research Ethics Committee (Ref. 09/H0722/91).

Results

Analysis revealed five key themes. Participants described usual care as burdensome and an inefficient use of time, particularly those in employment. Being able to self-monitor and initiate their own care increased patients' knowledge about their illness and its treatment, and enabled them to gain a sense of control and ownership over their arthritis. They appreciated the personalized nature of the new service, which allowed them to be seen at a time and by a method more appropriate to their needs. There were, however, some concerns about fidelity to the service protocol, confusion about the lack of consistency between symptoms and laboratory results, and anxiety about self-monitoring.

Conclusions

Overall, participants were positive about the new service, in comparison with usual care, valuing its tailored approach and empowering effects. Further work is needed to ensure adherence to the service protocol and address anxieties around self-monitoring prior to any widespread implementation of the service.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.