Whole-brain chemical exchange saturation transfer imaging with optimized turbo spin echo readout
Corresponding Author
Yi Zhang
Key Laboratory for Biomedical Engineering of Ministry of Education, Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering & Instrument Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Correspondence
Yi Zhang, Zhejiang University, Yuquan Campus, Zhou Yiqing Building, 38 Zheda Road, Hangzhou 310027, China.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorXingwang Yong
Key Laboratory for Biomedical Engineering of Ministry of Education, Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering & Instrument Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Search for more papers by this authorRuibin Liu
Key Laboratory for Biomedical Engineering of Ministry of Education, Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering & Instrument Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Search for more papers by this authorJibin Tang
Key Laboratory for Biomedical Engineering of Ministry of Education, Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering & Instrument Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Search for more papers by this authorHongjie Jiang
Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Search for more papers by this authorCaixia Fu
Siemens Shenzhen Magnetic Resonance Ltd., Shenzhen, China
Search for more papers by this authorRuili Wei
Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Search for more papers by this authorYi-Cheng Hsu
MR Collaboration, Siemens Healthcare Ltd., Shanghai, China
Search for more papers by this authorYi Sun
MR Collaboration, Siemens Healthcare Ltd., Shanghai, China
Search for more papers by this authorBenyan Luo
Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Search for more papers by this authorDan Wu
Key Laboratory for Biomedical Engineering of Ministry of Education, Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering & Instrument Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Yi Zhang
Key Laboratory for Biomedical Engineering of Ministry of Education, Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering & Instrument Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Correspondence
Yi Zhang, Zhejiang University, Yuquan Campus, Zhou Yiqing Building, 38 Zheda Road, Hangzhou 310027, China.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorXingwang Yong
Key Laboratory for Biomedical Engineering of Ministry of Education, Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering & Instrument Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Search for more papers by this authorRuibin Liu
Key Laboratory for Biomedical Engineering of Ministry of Education, Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering & Instrument Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Search for more papers by this authorJibin Tang
Key Laboratory for Biomedical Engineering of Ministry of Education, Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering & Instrument Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Search for more papers by this authorHongjie Jiang
Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Search for more papers by this authorCaixia Fu
Siemens Shenzhen Magnetic Resonance Ltd., Shenzhen, China
Search for more papers by this authorRuili Wei
Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Search for more papers by this authorYi-Cheng Hsu
MR Collaboration, Siemens Healthcare Ltd., Shanghai, China
Search for more papers by this authorYi Sun
MR Collaboration, Siemens Healthcare Ltd., Shanghai, China
Search for more papers by this authorBenyan Luo
Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Search for more papers by this authorDan Wu
Key Laboratory for Biomedical Engineering of Ministry of Education, Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering & Instrument Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Search for more papers by this authorFunding information
Natural Science Foundation of China (61801421, 81971605, 61801424, and 91859201); Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China (2018YFE0114600); Zhejiang Lab (2018EB0ZX01 and 2018DG0ZX01); and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2019FZJD005 and 2018QNA5016)
Abstract
Purpose
To achieve fast whole-brain chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) imaging with negligible susceptibility artifact.
Methods
An optimized turbo spin echo readout module, also known as sampling perfection with application optimized contrasts by using different flip angle evolutions (SPACE), was deployed in the CEST sequence. The SPACE-CEST sequence was tested in a phantom, 6 healthy volunteers, and 3 brain tumor patients on a 3T human scanner. A dual-echo gradient echo sequence was used for B0 inhomogeneity mapping. In addition, the proposed SPACE-CEST sequence was compared with the widely used turbo spin echo-CEST sequence for amide proton transfer–weighted (APTw) images.
Results
The SPACE-CEST sequence generated highly consistent APTw maps to those of the turbo spin echo-CEST sequence in the phantom. In healthy volunteers, the SPACE-CEST sequence yielded whole-brain 2.8-mm isotropic APTw source images within 5 minutes, with no discernible susceptibility artifact. As for the B0 maps in the whole brain, its mean, median, and standard deviation B0 offset values were 5.0 Hz, 5.6 Hz, and 16 Hz, respectively. Regarding the APTw map throughout the whole brain, its mean, median, and standard deviation values were 0.78%, 0.56%, and 1.74%, respectively. The SPACE-CEST sequence was also successfully applied to a postsurgery brain tumor patient, suggesting no disease progression. In addition, on the newly diagnosed brain tumor patients, the SPACE-CEST and turbo spin echo-CEST sequences yielded essentially identical APTw values.
Conclusion
The proposed SPACE-CEST technique can rapidly generate whole-brain CEST source images with negligible susceptibility artifact.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Caixia Fu, Yi-Cheng Hsu, and Yi Sun are employees of Siemens.
Supporting Information
Filename | Description |
---|---|
mrm28184-sup-0001-FigS1-S9.pdfPDF document, 3.1 MB |
FIGURE S1 Source S0 images spanning the whole BSA phantom from the proposed 3D SPACE-CEST sequence. No discernible artifact exists throughout the SPACE-CEST source images, reflecting the robustness of the proposed sequence FIGURE S2 The APTw images spanning the whole BSA phantom from the proposed 3D SPACE-CEST sequence. Minor artifacts occur at edge slices on the APTw images, possibly reflecting the deteriorating B0 field homogeneity FIGURE S3 Source S0 images (A) and corresponding B0 offset maps (B) spanning the whole brain of a normal volunteer from the proposed SPACE-CEST sequence using the constant flip angle refocusing mode. These images were ordered at a finer equidistant resolution than those shown in Figure 4. Red arrows indicate noticeable B0 inhomogeneity at the tissue–air interface FIGURE S4 Sagittal APTw images calculated from source images and B0 maps as shown in Figure 4. Skull stripping was performed to render only the brain volume. High-quality APTw maps spanning the whole brain were obtained with the proposed SPACE-CEST sequence, attesting its feasibility for in vivo applications FIGURE S5 Transverse APTw images calculated from retrospectively reconstructed source images and B0 maps in a transverse orientation. The original source images and B0 maps are shown in Figure 4. Whole-brain isotropic imaging with the SPACE-CEST sequence allows convenient retrospective multiplanar reconstruction FIGURE S6 Coronal APTw images calculated from retrospectively reconstructed source images and B0 maps in a coronal orientation. The original source images and B0 maps are shown in Figure 4. Whole-brain isotropic imaging with the SPACE-CEST sequence allows convenient retrospective multiplanar reconstruction FIGURE S7 The fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images (A) and corresponding APTw maps from the proposed SPACE-CEST (B) sequences done on the second newly diagnosed brain tumor patient. The SPACE-CEST sequence used the constant flip angle refocusing mode. Red arrows indicate the brain tumor regions FIGURE S8 The SPACE-CEST source images acquired with nominal turbo factors of 140 (A) and 90 (B) from the patient shown in Figure 7. The acquisition window of the SPACE readout module was reduced from 369 ms to 239 ms when decreasing the nominal turbo factor from 140 to 90. However, little improvement in spatial resolution was achieved (Supporting Information Figure S8B versus S8A), which corroborates the established conclusion that the SPACE readout module can support long acquisition duration up to 1 second, as noted in Ref. 39 FIGURE S9 The SPACE-CEST source images acquired with nominal turbo factors of 140 (A,B) and 90 (C), and in-plane resolution of 2.8 × 2.8 mm2 (A,C) and 1.4 × 1.4 mm2 (B) from the BSA phantom shown in Figure 2. Little improvement in spatial resolution was achieved when reducing the turbo factor from 140 to 90 (Supporting Information Figure S9C versus S9A), which is consistent with the results in Supporting Information Figure S8. However, noticeable improvement in spatial resolution was achieved when doubling the in-plane resolution without changing the turbo factor (Supporting Information Figure S9B versus S9A). Thus, one should probably consider using higher spatial resolution than 2.8 × 2.8 × 2.8 mm3 used here instead of shortening the turbo factor, if interested in reducing the blurriness. However, further investigation needs to be done to study the causes of blurriness in the future |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
REFERENCES
- 1Ward K, Aletras A, Balaban R. A new class of contrast agents for MRI based on proton chemical exchange dependent saturation transfer (CEST). J Magn Reson. 2000; 143: 79–87.
- 2van Zijl P, Yadav NN. Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST): what is in a name and what isn't? Magn Reson Med. 2011; 65: 927–948.
- 3Vinogradov E, Sherry AD, Lenkinski RE. CEST: from basic principles to applications, challenges and opportunities. J Magn Reson. 2013; 229: 155–172.
- 4van Zijl PCM, Lam WW, Xu J, Knutsson L, Stanisz GJ. Magnetization transfer contrast and chemical exchange saturation transfer MRI. Features and analysis of the field-dependent saturation spectrum. NeuroImage. 2018; 168: 222–241.
- 5Jones KM, Pollard AC, Pagel MD. Clinical applications of chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018; 47: 11–27.
- 6Zhou J, Heo HY, Knutsson L, van Zijl PC, Jiang S. APT-weighted MRI: techniques, current neuro applications, and challenging issues. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019; 50: 347–364.
- 7Zhou J, Payen J-F, Wilson DA, Traystman RJ, van Zijl PC. Using the amide proton signals of intracellular proteins and peptides to detect pH effects in MRI. Nature Med. 2003; 9: 1085–1090.
- 8Zhou J, Tryggestad E, Wen Z, et al. Differentiation between glioma and radiation necrosis using molecular magnetic resonance imaging of endogenous proteins and peptides. Nature Med. 2011; 17: 130–134.
- 9Zhou J, Zhu H, Lim M, et al. Three-dimensional amide proton transfer MR imaging of gliomas: Initial experience and comparison with gadolinium enhancement. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013; 38: 1119–1128.
- 10Togao O, Yoshiura T, Keupp J, et al. Amide proton transfer imaging of adult diffuse gliomas: correlation with histopathological grades. Neuro-Oncology. 2014; 16: 441–448.
- 11Ma B, Blakeley JO, Hong X, et al. Applying amide proton transfer-weighted MRI to distinguish pseudoprogression from true progression in malignant gliomas. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2016; 44: 456–462.
- 12Jiang S, Eberhart CG, Lim M, et al. Identifying recurrent malignant glioma after treatment using amide proton transfer-weighted MR imaging: a validation study with image-guided stereotactic biopsy. Clin Cancer Res. 2019; 25: 552–561.
- 13Mehrabian H, Myrehaug S, Soliman H, Sahgal A, Stanisz GJ. Evaluation of glioblastoma response to therapy with chemical exchange saturation transfer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018; 101: 713–723.
- 14Regnery S, Adeberg S, Dreher C, et al. Chemical exchange saturation transfer MRI serves as predictor of early progression in glioblastoma patients. Oncotarget. 2018; 9: 28772.
- 15Meissner J-E, Korzowski A, Regnery S, et al. Early response assessment of glioma patients to definitive chemoradiotherapy using chemical exchange saturation transfer imaging at 7 T. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019; 50: 1268–1277.
- 16Jiang S, Zou T, Eberhart CG, et al. Predicting IDH mutation status in grade II gliomas using amide proton transfer-weighted (APTw) MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2017; 78: 1100–1109.
- 17Paech D, Windschuh J, Oberhollenzer J, et al. Assessing the predictability of IDH mutation and MGMT methylation status in glioma patients using relaxation-compensated multipool CEST MRI at 7.0 T. Neuro-Oncology. 2018; 20: 1661–1671.
- 18Sun PZ, Zhou J, Sun W, Huang J, van Zijl PC. Detection of the ischemic penumbra using pH-weighted MRI. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2007; 27: 1129–1136.
- 19Harston GW, Tee YK, Blockley N, et al. Identifying the ischaemic penumbra using pH-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Brain. 2015; 138: 36–42.
- 20Cai K, Haris M, Singh A, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of glutamate. Nature Med. 2012; 18: 302–306.
- 21Davis KA, Nanga RPR, Das S, et al. Glutamate imaging (GluCEST) lateralizes epileptic foci in nonlesional temporal lobe epilepsy. Sci Transl Med. 2015; 7:309ra161.
- 22Roalf DR, Nanga RPR, Rupert PE, et al. Glutamate imaging (GluCEST) reveals lower brain GluCEST contrast in patients on the psychosis spectrum. Mol Psychiatry. 2017; 22: 1298.
- 23Chan KW, McMahon MT, Kato Y, et al. Natural D-glucose as a biodegradable MRI contrast agent for detecting cancer. Magn Reson Med. 2012; 68: 1764–1773.
- 24Walker-Samuel S, Ramasawmy R, Torrealdea F, et al. In vivo imaging of glucose uptake and metabolism in tumors. Nature Med. 2013; 19: 1067–1072.
- 25Xu X, Yadav NN, Knutsson L, et al. Dynamic glucose-enhanced (DGE) MRI: translation to human scanning and first results in glioma patients. Tomography. 2015; 1: 105–114.
- 26Zhou J, Blakeley JO, Hua J, et al. Practical data acquisition method for human brain tumor amide proton transfer (APT) imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2008; 60: 842–849.
- 27Zhu H, Jones CK, van Zijl P, Barker PB, Zhou J. Fast 3D chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) imaging of the human brain. Magn Reson Med. 2010; 64: 638–644.
- 28Schmitt B, Zaiß M, Zhou J, Bachert P. Optimization of pulse train presaturation for CEST imaging in clinical scanners. Magn Reson Med. 2011; 65: 1620–1629.
- 29Dula AN, Asche EM, Landman BA, et al. Development of chemical exchange saturation transfer at 7T. Magn Reson Med. 2011; 66: 831–838.
- 30Zaiss M, Ehses P, Scheffler K. Snapshot-CEST: optimizing spiral-centric-reordered gradient echo acquisition for fast and robust 3D CEST MRI at 9.4 T. NMR Biomed. 2018; 31:e3879.
- 31Deshmane A, Zaiss M, Lindig T, et al. 3D gradient echo snapshot CEST MRI with low power saturation for human studies at 3T. Magn Reson Med. 2019; 81: 2412–2423.
- 32Jones CK, Polders D, Hua J, et al. In vivo three-dimensional whole-brain pulsed steady-state chemical exchange saturation transfer at 7 T. Magn Reson Med. 2012; 67: 1579–1589.
- 33Khlebnikov V, Geades N, Klomp DW, Hoogduin H, Gowland P, Mougin O. Comparison of pulsed three-dimensional CEST acquisition schemes at 7 tesla: steady state versus pseudosteady state. Magn Reson Med. 2017; 77: 2280–2287.
- 34Akbey S, Ehses P, Stirnberg R, Zaiss M, Stöcker T. Whole-brain snapshot CEST imaging at 7 T using 3D-EPI. Magn Reson Med. 2019; 82: 1741–1752.
- 35Heo H-Y, Jones CK, Hua J, et al. Whole-brain amide proton transfer (APT) and nuclear overhauser enhancement (NOE) imaging in glioma patients using low-power steady-state pulsed chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) imaging at 7T. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2016; 44: 41–50.
- 36Mugler JP, Brookeman JR. Three-dimensional magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo imaging (3D MP RAGE). Magn Reson Med. 1990; 15: 152–157.
- 37Mueller S, Deshmane A, Herz K, Scheffler K, Zaiss M. Development of whole-brain 3D snapshot CEST MRI at 3T. In: Proceedings of the 27th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, 2019, Montréal, Canada. p 3995.
- 38Sun PZ, Benner T, Kumar A, Sorensen AG. Investigation of optimizing and translating pH-sensitive pulsed-chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) imaging to a 3T clinical scanner. Magn Reson Med. 2008; 60: 834–841.
- 39Mugler JP III. Optimized three-dimensional fast-spin-echo MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014; 39: 745–767.
- 40Mugler JP, Bao S, Mulkern RV, et al. Optimized single-slab three-dimensional spin-echo MR imaging of the brain. Radiology. 2000; 216: 891–899.
- 41Hennig J, Nauerth A, Friedburg H. RARE imaging: a fast imaging method for clinical MR. Magn Reson Med. 1986; 3: 823–833.
- 42Zhang Y, Heo HY, Jiang S, Lee DH, Bottomley PA, Zhou J. Highly accelerated chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) measurements with linear algebraic modeling. Magn Reson Med. 2016; 76: 136–144.
- 43Zhang Y, Heo H-Y, Lee D-H, et al. Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) imaging with fast variably-accelerated sensitivity encoding (vSENSE). Magn Reson Med. 2017; 77: 2225–2238.
- 44Zhang YI, Heo HY, Jiang S, Zhou J, Bottomley PA. Fast 3D chemical exchange saturation transfer imaging with variably-accelerated sensitivity encoding (vSENSE). Magn Reson Med. 2019; 82: 2046–2061.
- 45Heo H-Y, Xu X, Jiang S, et al. Prospective acceleration of parallel RF transmission-based 3D chemical exchange saturation transfer imaging with compressed sensing. Magn Reson Med. 2019; 82: 1812–1821.
- 46Busse RF, Hariharan H, Vu A, Brittain JH. Fast spin echo sequences with very long echo trains: design of variable refocusing flip angle schedules and generation of clinical T2 contrast. Magn Reson Med. 2006; 55: 1030–1037.
- 47Park J, Mugler JP III, Horger W, Kiefer B. Optimized T1-weighted contrast for single-slab 3D turbo spin-echo imaging with long echo trains: application to whole-brain imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2007; 58: 982–992.
- 48Mugler J III, Bao S, Mulkern R, Guttmann C, Jolesz F, Brookeman J. Three-dimensional spin-echo-train proton-density-weighted imaging using shaped signal evolutions. In: Proceedings of the 7th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, 1999, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. p 1631.
- 49Mugler JP, Kiefer B, Brookeman JR. Three-dimensional T2-weighted imaging of the brain using very long spin-echo trains. In: Proceedings of the 8th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, 2000, Denver, Colorado. p 687.
- 50Del Grande F, Santini F, Herzka DA, et al. Fat-suppression techniques for 3-T MR imaging of the musculoskeletal system. Radiographics. 2014; 34: 217–233.
- 51Griswold MA, Jakob PM, Heidemann RM, et al. Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn Reson Med. 2002; 47: 1202–1210.
- 52Hajnal JV, Bryant DJ, Kasuboski L, et al. Use of fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) pulse sequences in MRI of the brain. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1992; 16: 841–844.
- 53Jones CK, Schlosser MJ, van Zijl PCM, Pomper MG, Golay X, Zhou JY. Amide proton transfer imaging of human brain tumors at 3T. Magn Reson Med. 2006; 56: 585–592.
- 54Zhang YI, Heo H-Y, Lee D-H, et al. Selecting the reference image for registration of CEST series. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2016; 43: 756–761.
- 55Jenkinson M, Bannister P, Brady M, Smith S. Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. NeuroImage. 2002; 17: 825–841.
- 56Togao O, Keupp J, Hiwatashi A, et al. Amide proton transfer imaging of brain tumors using a self-corrected 3D fast spin-echo dixon method: comparison with separate B0 correction. Magn Reson Med. 2017; 77: 2272–2279.
- 57Ma BO, Blakeley JO, Hong X, et al. Applying amide proton transfer-weighted MRI to distinguish pseudoprogression from true progression in malignant gliomas. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2016; 44: 456–462.
- 58Liu R, Zhang H, Niu W, et al. Improved chemical exchange saturation transfer imaging with real-time frequency drift correction. Magn Reson Med. 2019; 81: 2915–2923.
- 59Jones DK, Williams SCR, Gasston D, Horsfield MA, Simmons A, Howard R. Isotropic resolution diffusion tensor imaging with whole brain acquisition in a clinically acceptable time. Human Brain Mapp. 2002; 15: 216–230.
- 60Alsop DC, Detre JA, Golay X, et al. Recommended implementation of arterial spin-labeled perfusion MRI for clinical applications: a consensus of the ISMRM perfusion study group and the European consortium for ASL in dementia. Magn Reson Med. 2015; 73: 102–116.
- 61Windschuh J, Zaiss M, Meissner JE, et al. Correction of B1-inhomogeneities for relaxation-compensated CEST imaging at 7 T. NMR Biomed. 2015; 28: 529–537.
- 62Schuenke P, Windschuh J, Roeloffs V, Ladd ME, Bachert P, Zaiss M. Simultaneous mapping of water shift and B1 (WASABI)—application to field-inhomogeneity correction of CEST MRI data. Magn Reson Med. 2017; 77: 571–580.
- 63Kim M, Gillen J, Landman BA, Zhou J, van Zijl P. Water saturation shift referencing (WASSR) for chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) experiments. Magn Reson Med. 2009; 61: 1441–1450.
- 64Walsh DO, Gmitro AF, Marcellin MW. Adaptive reconstruction of phased array MR imagery. Magn Reson Med. 2000; 43: 682–690.
10.1002/(SICI)1522-2594(200005)43:5<682::AID-MRM10>3.0.CO;2-G CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 65Roemer P, Edelstein W, Hayes C, Souza S, Mueller O. The NMR phased array. Magn Reson Med. 1990; 16: 192–225.