Volume 81, Issue 1 pp. 466-476
NOTE

Evaluating the accuracy of multicomponent T2 parameters for luminal water imaging of the prostate with acceleration using inner-volume 3D GRASE

Rachel W. Chan

Corresponding Author

Rachel W. Chan

Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Correspondence

Rachel W. Chan, Sunnybrook Research Institute, 2075 Bayview Ave, Toronto, Ontario Canada, M4N 3M5.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Angus Z. Lau

Angus Z. Lau

Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Garry Detzler

Garry Detzler

Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Vivekanandan Thayalasuthan

Vivekanandan Thayalasuthan

Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Robert K. Nam

Robert K. Nam

Division of Urology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Masoom A. Haider

Masoom A. Haider

Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 29 July 2018
Citations: 11

Abstract

Purpose

Prostate cancer can be detected using a multicomponent T2 mapping technique termed luminal water imaging. The purpose of this study is twofold: 1) To accelerate the luminal water imaging acquisition by using inner volume selection as part of a gradient and spin echo sequence, and 2) to evaluate the accuracy of luminal water fractions and multicomponent T2 relaxation times.

Methods

The accuracy of parameter estimates was assessed using Monte Carlo simulations, in phantom experiments and in the prostate (in 5 healthy subjects). Two fitting methods, nonnegative least squares and biexponential fitting with stimulated echo correction, were compared.

Results

Results demonstrate that inner volume selection in a gradient and spin echo sequence is effective for accelerating prostate luminal water imaging by at least threefold. Evaluation of the accuracy shows that the estimated luminal water fractions are relatively accurate, but the short- and long-T2 relaxation times should be interpreted with caution in noisy scenarios (SNR < 100) and when the corresponding fractions are small ( < 0.5). The mean luminal water fractions obtained at SNR above 100 are 0.27 ± 0.07 for the peripheral zone for both fitting methods, 0.16 ± 0.04 for the transition zone with nonnegative least squares, and 0.16 ± 0.03 for the transition zone with biexponential fitting including stimulated echo correction.

Conclusion

The shortened scan duration allows the luminal water imaging sequence to be easily integrated into a standard multiparametric prostate MRI protocol.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.