Volume 80, Issue 1 pp. 21-28
Full Paper

Frequency and phase correction for multiplexed edited MRS of GABA and glutathione

Mark Mikkelsen

Mark Mikkelsen

Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

F.M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Muhammad G. Saleh

Muhammad G. Saleh

Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

F.M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Jamie Near

Jamie Near

Douglas Mental Health University Institute and Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Kimberly L. Chan

Kimberly L. Chan

Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

F.M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Tao Gong

Tao Gong

Shandong Medical Imaging Research Institute, Shandong University, Jinan, China

Search for more papers by this author
Ashley D. Harris

Ashley D. Harris

Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Child and Adolescent Imaging Research (CAIR) Program, Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Georg Oeltzschner

Georg Oeltzschner

Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

F.M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Nicolaas A.J. Puts

Nicolaas A.J. Puts

Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

F.M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Kim M. Cecil

Kim M. Cecil

Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Iain D. Wilkinson

Iain D. Wilkinson

Academic Unit of Radiology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom

Search for more papers by this author
Richard A.E. Edden

Corresponding Author

Richard A.E. Edden

Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

F.M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

Correspondence to: Richard A.E. Edden, Ph.D., Division of Neuroradiology, Park 367H, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
First published: 07 December 2017
Citations: 26

This work was supported by NIH grants R01 EB016089, R01 EB023963, R01 MH106564, R01 NS096207, P41 EB015909, and R01 ES0277224.

N.A.J.P. receives salary support from NIH grant K99 MH107719. I.D.W. acknowledges support from the Wellcome Trust and NIHR Sheffield Biomedical Research Centre.

Abstract

Purpose

Detection of endogenous metabolites using multiplexed editing substantially improves the efficiency of edited magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Multiplexed editing (i.e., performing more than one edited experiment in a single acquisition) requires a tailored, robust approach for correction of frequency and phase offsets. Here, a novel method for frequency and phase correction (FPC) based on spectral registration is presented and compared against previously presented approaches.

Methods

One simulated dataset and 40 γ-aminobutyric acid-/glutathione-edited HERMES datasets acquired in vivo at three imaging centers were used to test four FPC approaches: no correction; spectral registration; spectral registration with post hoc choline-creatine alignment; and multistep FPC. The performance of each routine for the simulated dataset was assessed by comparing the estimated frequency/phase offsets against the known values, whereas the performance for the in vivo data was assessed quantitatively by calculation of an alignment quality metric based on choline subtraction artifacts.

Results

The multistep FPC approach returned corrections that were closest to the true values for the simulated dataset. Alignment quality scores were on average worst for no correction, and best for multistep FPC in both the γ-aminobutyric acid- and glutathione-edited spectra in the in vivo data.

Conclusions

Multistep FPC results in improved correction of frequency/phase errors in multiplexed γ-aminobutyric acid-/glutathione-edited magnetic resonance spectroscopy experiments. The optimal FPC strategy is experiment-specific, and may even be dataset-specific. Magn Reson Med 80:21–28, 2018. © 2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.