Volume 72, Issue 1 pp. 33-40
Full Paper

Influence of eddy current, Maxwell and gradient field corrections on 3D flow visualization of 3D CINE PC-MRI data

Ramona Lorenz

Corresponding Author

Ramona Lorenz

Department of Radiology, Medical Physics, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany

Correspondence to: Ramona Lorenz, M.Sc., University Medical Center Freiburg, Department of Radiology, Medical Physics, Breisacher Strasse 60a, 79106 Freiburg, Germany. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Jelena Bock

Jelena Bock

Department of Radiology, Medical Physics, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Jeff Snyder

Jeff Snyder

Department of Radiology, Medical Physics, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany

Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Jan G. Korvink

Jan G. Korvink

Department of Microsystems Engineering—IMTEK, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany

Freiburg Institute of Advanced Studies (FRIAS), University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Bernd A. Jung

Bernd A. Jung

Department of Radiology, Medical Physics, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Michael Markl

Michael Markl

Department of Radiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA

Department of Biomedical Engineering, McCormick School of Engineering, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 04 September 2013
Citations: 49

Abstract

Purpose

The measurement of velocities based on phase contrast MRI can be subject to different phase offset errors which can affect the accuracy of velocity data. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of these inaccuracies and to evaluate different correction strategies on three-dimensional visualization.

Methods

Phase contrast MRI was performed on a 3 T system (Siemens Trio) for in vitro (curved/straight tube models; venc: 0.3 m/s) and in vivo (aorta/intracranial vasculature; venc: 1.5/0.4 m/s) data. For comparison of the impact of different magnetic field gradient designs, in vitro data was additionally acquired on a wide bore 1.5 T system (Siemens Espree). Different correction methods were applied to correct for eddy currents, Maxwell terms, and gradient field inhomogeneities.

Results

The application of phase offset correction methods lead to an improvement of three-dimensional particle trace visualization and count. The most pronounced differences were found for in vivo/in vitro data (68%/82% more particle traces) acquired with a low venc (0.3 m/s/0.4 m/s, respectively). In vivo data acquired with high venc (1.5 m/s) showed noticeable but only minor improvement.

Conclusion

This study suggests that the correction of phase offset errors can be important for a more reliable visualization of particle traces but is strongly dependent on the velocity sensitivity, object geometry, and gradient coil design. Magn Reson Med 72:33–40, 2014. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.