Volume 52, Issue 2 pp. 300-309
Full Paper

Factors affecting the accuracy of pressure measurements in vascular stenoses from phase-contrast MRI

Abbas Nasiraei-Moghaddam

Abbas Nasiraei-Moghaddam

CVIA Laboratory, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri

Search for more papers by this author
Geoffrey Behrens

Geoffrey Behrens

CVIA Laboratory, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri

Search for more papers by this author
Nasser Fatouraee

Nasser Fatouraee

CVIA Laboratory, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri

Search for more papers by this author
Ramesh Agarwal

Ramesh Agarwal

CVIA Laboratory, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri

Search for more papers by this author
Eric T. Choi

Eric T. Choi

CVIA Laboratory, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri

Search for more papers by this author
Amir A. Amini

Corresponding Author

Amir A. Amini

CVIA Laboratory, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri

CVIA Laboratory, Washington University School of Medicine, Box 8086, 660 S. Euclid Ave., Saint Louis, MO 63110===Search for more papers by this author
First published: 23 July 2004
Citations: 37

Abstract

In this work the effects of noise, resolution, and velocity (flow) on the measurement of intravascular pressure from phase-contrast (PC) MRI are discussed. To elucidate these effects, we employed an axisymmetric geometry that enabled us to calculate pressures in <2 min on a Sun Ultra SPARC 10 workstation. To determine the effects of vascular stenoses, we fabricated several stenotic phantom geometries (with 50%, 75%, and 90% area stenoses), and performed both MRI and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations for various flow rates for these phantom geometries. Noise with Gaussian statistics was added to the velocity field obtained from the CFD simulations. The pressure maps obtained directly from CFD simulations for our phantom geometries were compared with pressure maps derived by our algorithm when 1) the input was noise-corrupted velocity data from CFD, and 2) the input was PC-MRI data collected from the phantoms. The quantitative effects of noise, resolution, and flow rate on the accuracy of pressure measurements were determined. We found that for flow rates below the Reynolds number for turbulent flow, resolution is a more significant determinant of accuracy than SNR. Furthermore, if other parameters remain constant, increased flow rates may result in decreased accuracy. Magn Reson Med 52:300–309, 2004. © 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.