Volume 47, Issue 5 pp. 921-928
Full Paper

Test-retest reproducibility of quantitative CBF measurements using FAIR perfusion MRI and acetazolamide challenge

Yi-Fen Yen

Corresponding Author

Yi-Fen Yen

Department of Medical Engineering, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina

Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Western Ontario, 339 Windermere Road, London, Ontario N6A 5A5, Canada===Search for more papers by this author
Aaron S. Field

Aaron S. Field

Department of Radiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina

Search for more papers by this author
Eric M. Martin

Eric M. Martin

Eastern Radiologists, Greenville, North Carolina

Search for more papers by this author
Narter Ari

Narter Ari

Department of Medical Engineering, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina

Search for more papers by this author
Jonathan H. Burdette

Jonathan H. Burdette

Department of Radiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina

Search for more papers by this author
Dixon M. Moody

Dixon M. Moody

Department of Radiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina

Search for more papers by this author
Atsushi M. Takahashi

Atsushi M. Takahashi

Center for In Vivo Microscopy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 22 April 2002
Citations: 75

Abstract

The reproducibility of quantitative cerebral blood flow (CBF) measurements using MRI with arterial spin labeling and acetazolamide challenge was assessed in 12 normal subjects, each undergoing the identical experimental procedure on two separate days. CBF was measured on a 1.5T scanner using a flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery (FAIR) pulse sequence, performed both at baseline and 12 min after intravenous administration of acetazolamide. T1 was measured in conjunction with the FAIR scan in order to calculate quantitative CBF. The CBF maps were segmented to separate gray matter (GM) from white matter (WM) for region-of-interest (ROI) analyses. Post- acetazolamide CBF values (ml/100 g/min, mean ± SD) of 87.5 ± 12.5 (GM) and 46.1 ± 10.8 (WM) represented percent increases of 37.7% ± 24.4% (GM) and 40.1% ± 24.4% (WM). Day-to-day differences in baseline CBF were −1.7 ± 6.9 (GM) and –1.4 ± 4.7 (WM) or, relative to the mean CBF over both days for each subject, −2.5% ± 11.7% (GM) and −3.8% ± 13.6% (WM) Day- to-day differences in absolute post-ACZ CBF increase were −2.5 ± 6.8 (GM) and 2.7 ± 9.4 (WM) or, relative to the mean CBF increase over both days for each subject, –4.7% ± 13.3% (GM) and 9.1% ± 26.2% (WM). Thus, FAIR- based CBF measurements show satisfactory reproducibility from day to day, but with sufficient variation to warrant caution in interpreting longitudinal data. The hemispheric asymmetry of baseline CBF and post-acetazolamide CBF increases varied within a narrower range and should be sensitive to small changes related to disease or treatment. Magn Reson Med 47:921–928, 2002. © 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.