Test-retest reproducibility of quantitative CBF measurements using FAIR perfusion MRI and acetazolamide challenge
Corresponding Author
Yi-Fen Yen
Department of Medical Engineering, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Western Ontario, 339 Windermere Road, London, Ontario N6A 5A5, Canada===Search for more papers by this authorAaron S. Field
Department of Radiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
Search for more papers by this authorEric M. Martin
Eastern Radiologists, Greenville, North Carolina
Search for more papers by this authorNarter Ari
Department of Medical Engineering, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
Search for more papers by this authorJonathan H. Burdette
Department of Radiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
Search for more papers by this authorDixon M. Moody
Department of Radiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
Search for more papers by this authorAtsushi M. Takahashi
Center for In Vivo Microscopy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Yi-Fen Yen
Department of Medical Engineering, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Western Ontario, 339 Windermere Road, London, Ontario N6A 5A5, Canada===Search for more papers by this authorAaron S. Field
Department of Radiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
Search for more papers by this authorEric M. Martin
Eastern Radiologists, Greenville, North Carolina
Search for more papers by this authorNarter Ari
Department of Medical Engineering, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
Search for more papers by this authorJonathan H. Burdette
Department of Radiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
Search for more papers by this authorDixon M. Moody
Department of Radiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
Search for more papers by this authorAtsushi M. Takahashi
Center for In Vivo Microscopy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
The reproducibility of quantitative cerebral blood flow (CBF) measurements using MRI with arterial spin labeling and acetazolamide challenge was assessed in 12 normal subjects, each undergoing the identical experimental procedure on two separate days. CBF was measured on a 1.5T scanner using a flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery (FAIR) pulse sequence, performed both at baseline and 12 min after intravenous administration of acetazolamide. T1 was measured in conjunction with the FAIR scan in order to calculate quantitative CBF. The CBF maps were segmented to separate gray matter (GM) from white matter (WM) for region-of-interest (ROI) analyses. Post- acetazolamide CBF values (ml/100 g/min, mean ± SD) of 87.5 ± 12.5 (GM) and 46.1 ± 10.8 (WM) represented percent increases of 37.7% ± 24.4% (GM) and 40.1% ± 24.4% (WM). Day-to-day differences in baseline CBF were −1.7 ± 6.9 (GM) and –1.4 ± 4.7 (WM) or, relative to the mean CBF over both days for each subject, −2.5% ± 11.7% (GM) and −3.8% ± 13.6% (WM) Day- to-day differences in absolute post-ACZ CBF increase were −2.5 ± 6.8 (GM) and 2.7 ± 9.4 (WM) or, relative to the mean CBF increase over both days for each subject, –4.7% ± 13.3% (GM) and 9.1% ± 26.2% (WM). Thus, FAIR- based CBF measurements show satisfactory reproducibility from day to day, but with sufficient variation to warrant caution in interpreting longitudinal data. The hemispheric asymmetry of baseline CBF and post-acetazolamide CBF increases varied within a narrower range and should be sensitive to small changes related to disease or treatment. Magn Reson Med 47:921–928, 2002. © 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
REFERENCES
- 1 Powers WJ, Raichle ME. Positron emission tomography and its application to the study of cerebrovascular disease in man. Stroke 1985; 16: 361–376.
- 2 Toyama H, Takeshita G, Takeuchi A, Anno H, Ejiri K, Maeda H, Katada K, Koga S, Ishiyama N, Kanno T. Cerebral hemodynamics in patients with chronic obstructive carotid disease by rCBF, rCBV, and rCBV/rCBF ratio using SPECT. J Nucl Med 1990; 31: 55–60.
- 3 Sabatini U, Celsis P, Viallard G, Rascol A, Marc-Vergnes JP. Quantitative assessment of cerebral blood volume by single-photon emission computed tomography. Stroke 1991; 22: 324–330.
- 4 Guckel FJ, Brix G, Schmiedek P, Piepgras Z, Becker G, Kopke J, Gross H, Georgi M. Cerebrovascular reserve capacity in patients with occlusive cerebrovascular disease: assessment with dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MR imaging and the acetazolamide stimulation test. Radiology 1996; 201: 405–412.
- 5
Detre JA,
Samuels OB,
Alsop DC,
Gonzalez-At JB,
Kasner SE,
Raps EC.
Noninvasive magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of cerebral blood flow with acetazolamide challenge in patients with cerebrovascular stenosis.
J Magn Reson Imaging
1999;
10:
870–875.
10.1002/(SICI)1522-2586(199911)10:5<870::AID-JMRI36>3.0.CO;2-D CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 6 Bonte FJ, Devous MD, Reisch JS. The effect of acetazolamide on regional cerebral blood flow in normal human subjects as measured by single-photon emission computed tomography. Invest Radiol 1988; 23: 564–568.
- 7 Hayashida K, Tanaka Y, Hirose Y, Kume N, Iwama T, Miyake Y, Ishida Y, Matsuura H, Miyake Y, Nishimura T. Vasoreactive effect of acetazolamide as a function of time with sequential PET 15O-water measurement. Nucl Med Commun 1996; 17: 1047–1051.
- 8 Arigoni M, Kneifel S, Fandino J, Khan N, Burger C, Buck A. Simplified quantitative determination of cerebral perfusion reserve with H2(15)O PET and acetazolamide. Eur J Nucl Med 2000; 27: 1557–1563.
- 9 Yamashita T, Hayashi M, Kashiwagi S, Nakano S, Eguchi Y, Takasago T, Urakawa M, Ito H. Cerebrovascular reserve capacity in ischemia due to occlusion of a major arterial trunk: studies by Xe-CT and the acetazolamide test. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1992; 16: 750–755.
- 10 Okudaira Y, Bandoh K, Arai H, Sato K. Evaluation of the acetazolamide test. Vasoreactivity and cerebral blood volume. Stroke 1995; 26: 1234–1239.
- 11 Piepgras A, Schmiedek P, Leinsinger G, Haberl RL, Kirsch CM, Einhaupl KM. A simple test to assess cerebrovascular reserve capacity using transcranial Doppler sonography and acetazolamide. Stroke 1990; 21: 1306–1311.
- 12 Levin JM, Kaufman MJ, Ross MH, Mendelson JH, Maas LC, Cohen BM, Renshaw PF. Sequential dynamic susceptibility contrast MR experiments in human brain: residual contrast agent effect, steady state, and hemodynamic perturbation. Magn Reson Med 1995; 34: 655–663.
- 13 Petrella JR, DeCarli C, Dagli M, Duyn JH, Grandin CB, Frank JA, Hoffman EA, Theodore WH. Assessment of whole-brain vasodilatory capacity with acetazolamide challenge at 1.5 T using dynamic contrast imaging with frequency-shifted burst. Am J Neuroradiol 1997; 18: 1153–1161.
- 14 Berthezene Y, Nighoghossian N, Meyer R, Damien J, Cinotti L, Adeleine P, Trouillas P, Froment JC. Can cerebrovascular reactivity be assessed by dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI? Neuroradiology 1998; 40: 1–5.
- 15 Chabriat H, Pappata S, Ostergaard L, Clark CA, Pachot-Clouard M, Vahedi K, Jobert A, Le Bihan D, Bousser MG. Cerebral hemodynamics in CADASIL before and after acetazolamide challenge assessed with MRI bolus tracking. Stroke 2000; 31: 1904–1912.
- 16 Kim SG. Quantification of relative cerebral blood flow change by flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery (FAIR) technique: application to functional mapping. Magn Reson Med 1995; 34: 293–301.
- 17 Field AS, Yen Y-F, Burdette JH, Moody DM. The effect of ordinary coffee consumption on quantitative cerebral perfusion MR imaging. In: Proceedings of the 9th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Glasgow, Scotland, 2001. p 1576.
- 18 Yang Y, Frank JA, Hou L, Ye FQ, McLaughlin AC, Duyn JH. Multislice imaging of quantitative cerebral perfusion with pulsed arterial spin labeling. Magn Reson Med 1998; 39: 825–832.
- 19 Frackowiak RSJ, Friston KJ, Frith CD, Dolan RJ, Mazziotta JC. Human brain function. New York: Academic Press; 1997.
- 20 Herscovitch P, Raichle ME. What is the correct value for the brain—blood partition coefficient for water? J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1985; 5: 65–69.
- 21 Vymazal J, Zak O, Bulte JW, Aisen P, Brooks RA. T1 and T2 of ferritin solutions: effect of loading factor. Magn Reson Med 1996; 36: 61–65.
- 22 Schroeder T. Cerebrovascular reactivity to acetazolamide in carotid artery disease. Enhancement of side-to-side CBF asymmetry indicates critically reduced perfusion pressure. Neurol Res 1986; 8: 231–236.
- 23 Sullivan HG, Kingsbury TBT, Morgan ME, Jeffcoat RD, Allison JD, Goode JJ, McDonnell DE. The rCBF response to Diamox in normal subjects and cerebrovascular disease patients. J Neurosurg 1987; 67: 525–534.
- 24 Chollet F, Celsis P, Clanet M, Guiraud-Chaumeil B, Rascol A, Marc-Vergnes JP. SPECT study of cerebral blood flow reactivity after acetazolamide in patients with transient ischemic attacks. Stroke 1989; 20: 458–464.
- 25 Nighoghossian N, Berthezene Y, Meyer R, Cinotti L, Adeleine P, Philippon B, Froment JC, Trouillas P. Assessment of cerebrovascular reactivity by dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MR imaging. J Neurol Sci 1997; 149: 171–176.
- 26 Ye FQ, Berman KF, Ellmore T, Esposito G, van Horn JD, Yang Y, Duyn J, Smith AM, Frank JA, Weinberger DR, McLaughlin AC. H(2)(15)O PET validation of steady-state arterial spin tagging cerebral blood flow measurements in humans. Magn Reson Med 2000; 44: 450–456.
- 27 Blauenstein UW, Halsey Jr JH, Wilson EM, Wills EL, Risberg J. 133Xenon inhalation method. Analysis of reproducibility: some of its physiological implications. Stroke 1977; 8: 92–102.
- 28 Devous Sr MD, Stokely EM, Chehabi HH, Bonte FJ. Normal distribution of regional cerebral blood flow measured by dynamic single-photon emission tomography. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1986; 6: 95–104.
- 29 Obrist WD, Thompson Jr HK, Wang HS, Wilkinson WE. Regional cerebral blood flow estimated by 133-xenon inhalation. Stroke 1975; 6: 245–256.
- 30 Schroeder T, Holstein P, Lassen NA, Engell HC. Measurement of cerebral blood flow by intravenous xenon-133 technique and a mobile system. Reproducibility using the Obrist model compared to total curve analysis. Neurol Res 1986; 8: 237–242.
- 31 Perlmutter JS, Powers WJ, Herscovitch P, Fox PT, Raichle ME. Regional asymmetries of cerebral blood flow, blood volume, and oxygen utilization and extraction in normal subjects. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1987; 7: 64–67.
- 32 Wong EC, Buxton RB, Frank LR. A theoretical and experimental comparison of continuous and pulsed arterial spin labeling techniques for quantitative perfusion imaging. Magn Reson Med 1998; 40: 348–355.
- 33 Buxton RB, Frank LR, Wong EC, Siewert B, Warach S, Edelman RR. A general kinetic model for quantitative perfusion imaging with arterial spin labeling. Magn Reson Med 1998; 40: 383–396.
- 34 Yang Y, Engelien W, Xu S, Gu H, Silbersweig DA, Stern E. Transit time, trailing time, and cerebral blood flow during brain activation: measurement using multislice, pulsed spin-labeling perfusion imaging. Magn Reson Med 2000; 44: 680–685.
- 35
Gonzalez-At JB,
Alsop DC,
Detre JA.
Cerebral perfusion and arterial transit time changes during task activation determined with continuous arterial spin labeling.
Magn Reson Med
2000;
43:
739–746.
10.1002/(SICI)1522-2594(200005)43:5<739::AID-MRM17>3.0.CO;2-2 CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar