Volume 42, Issue 3 pp. 287-294
REVIEW ARTICLE

Pelvic ring reconstruction with double-barreled fibular free flap: A systematic review

Stefano Bastoni MD

Stefano Bastoni MD

C.O.O., Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Gaetano Pini, Milan, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Elena Lucattelli MD

Corresponding Author

Elena Lucattelli MD

Plastic and Reconstructive Microsurgery, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy

Correspondence

Elena Lucattelli, Plastic and Reconstructive Microsurgery, Careggi University Hospital, AOU Careggi Largo Piero Palagi 1, Firenze 50139, Italy.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Federico Cipriani MD

Federico Cipriani MD

Plastic and Reconstructive Microsurgery, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Giacomo Cannamela MSc

Giacomo Cannamela MSc

Data Scientist, Bologna, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Marco Innocenti MD

Marco Innocenti MD

Plastic and Reconstructive Microsurgery, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Giulio Menichini MD

Giulio Menichini MD

Plastic and Reconstructive Microsurgery, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 09 September 2021

Abstract

Introduction

Pelvic ring reconstruction after internal hemipelvectomy is an extremely challenging surgical procedure, and mandatory reconstruction is to provide a durable and pain-free functional outcome, especially for young, active patients. One of the most widely employed techniques is reconstruction with a double-barreled fibular free flap (DBF). The aim of our work was an in-depth analysis of the outcome of pelvic ring reconstruction performed using the above-mentioned method, in particular looking for a correlation between the fixation technique and either ambulation status or complications.

Materials and methods

A systematic review was performed in November 2020 using PubMed and MedLine Ovid databases according to the PRISMA guidelines and the results were statistically analyzed.

Results

Studies were published between 1994 and 2015. A DBF was used in each case, with a total of 30 patients. Reconstruction was performed with screws in 13 cases, Cotrel-Dubousset rod fixation in 6, screws and plate in 5, screws with external fixation in 4, and ISOLA in 2. Follow-up time ranged from 3 to 131 months. Functional outcome was excellent in 4 patients and good in 26 patients. Statistical analysis showed no statistical evidence of existing correlation between fixation technique and complications (p = .873), while statistical correlation between age and fixation technique was found (p < .001).

Conclusion

Reconstruction of pelvic ring with DBF provides an overall good functional outcome. Our data indicate that there is no statistical evidence of existing correlation between the fixation technique and either complications or ambulation status.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data that support the findings of this review are available from the corresponding author, E.L., upon reasonable request.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.