Volume 41, Issue 3 pp. 233-239
CLINICAL ARTICLE

Use of soleus musculocutaneous perforator-based propeller flap for lower extremity wound coverage after osteocutaneous fibula free flap harvest

Arshad Kaleem MD, DMD, FACS

Arshad Kaleem MD, DMD, FACS

DeWitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery, Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Section of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology/Microvascular Reconstructive Surgery, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine/Jackson Health System, Miami, Florida, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Neel Patel MD, DMD

Corresponding Author

Neel Patel MD, DMD

DeWitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery, Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Section of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology/Microvascular Reconstructive Surgery, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine/Jackson Health System, Miami, Florida, USA

Correspondence

Neel Patel, Surgical Fellow, DeWitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery, Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Section of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology/Microvascular Reconstructive Surgery, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine/Jackson Health System, Deering Medical Plaza, 9380 SW, Miami, FL 33176.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Enrique Schubert DDS

Enrique Schubert DDS

DeWitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery, Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Section of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology/Microvascular Reconstructive Surgery, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine/Jackson Health System, Miami, Florida, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Ramzey Tursun DDS, FACS

Ramzey Tursun DDS, FACS

DeWitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery, Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Section of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology/Microvascular Reconstructive Surgery, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine/Jackson Health System, Miami, Florida, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 16 December 2020
Citations: 5

Abstract

Background

Osteocutaneous fibula free flap (OCFFF) donor sites are often covered with skin grafts, with an additional donor site, more postoperative care, and increased cost. The authors examine posterior tibial artery (PTA) based pedicled propeller flaps (PPF) as an alternative for OCFFF donor site coverage.

Patients and methods

Retrospective review of 16 consecutive patients from 30 to 79 years old, who underwent OCFFF reconstruction of head and neck defects (11 mandibular, 5 maxillary), with the closure of donor site with PPF based on a perforator from PTA. Mean donor site defect measured 12.9 × 5.1 cm, PPF was an elliptical design, and rotated 180 degrees in a propeller fashion, to cover donor site defect. Visual analog scale (VAS) was used to assess esthetic results, functional outcomes assessed using mobility and range of motion (ROM), and secondary complications including infections, hematomas, and seromas were recorded. Follow-up period was noted in months postoperatively. Other information collected included underlying head and neck pathology.

Results

Average dimension of PPF measured 13.9 × 4.1 cm. Successful closure of donor site defects in 14 of 16 patients, with two flaps having partial necrosis, one requiring a secondary skin graft. Follow-up was 6 to 10 months, esthetic results with mean VAS 8.8 of 10, full ROM, and mobility noted. No secondary complications were observed. The most common pathology noted was squamous cell carcinoma (6 of 16 patients).

Conclusion

PPFs based on the soleus branch of the PTA represent an excellent alternative to skin grafts for the closure of OCFFF donor site defects.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

None declared.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Data sharing not applicable - no new data generatedData sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.