Volume 41, Issue 3 pp. 240-249
CLINICAL ARTICLE

Comparing outcomes between stacked/conjoined and non-stacked/conjoined abdominal microvascular unilateral breast reconstruction

Ara A. Salibian MD

Ara A. Salibian MD

Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Jonathan M. Bekisz MD, MSc

Jonathan M. Bekisz MD, MSc

Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Jordan D. Frey MD

Jordan D. Frey MD

Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Ian T. Nolan BM

Ian T. Nolan BM

Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Christodoulos Kaoutzanis MD

Christodoulos Kaoutzanis MD

Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Jason W. Yu MD

Jason W. Yu MD

Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Jamie P. Levine MD

Jamie P. Levine MD

Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Nolan S. Karp MD

Nolan S. Karp MD

Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Mihye Choi MD

Mihye Choi MD

Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Vishal D. Thanik MD

Corresponding Author

Vishal D. Thanik MD

Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York, USA

Correspondence

Vishal D. Thanik, Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, 222 East 41st Street, 6th floor, New York, NY 10017.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 30 September 2020
Citations: 12

This article was presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Reconstructive Microsurgery 2020, Ft. Lauderdale, FL.

Abstract

Background

Stacked and conjoined free flaps are increasingly utilized in autologous breast reconstruction to augment tissue transfer volume. However, there is a paucity of comparative data on abdominally-based stacked/conjoined versus non-stacked/conjoined flaps. The purpose of this study was to compare ability to match native breast size, complications, recovery, and symmetrizing procedures between these two cohorts in unilateral breast reconstruction.

Methods

A retrospective review of all stacked (two separate hemiabdominal)/conjoined (bipedicled full abdominal) flaps and non-stacked/conjoined (unipedicled hemiabdominal) flaps in unilateral abdominally-based autologous breast reconstructions was performed from 2011 to 2018. Variables including demographics, operative characteristics, complications, and revisions were compared in 36 stacked/conjoined patients versus 146 non-stacked/conjoined patients.

Results

The stacked/conjoined cohort had more DIEP flaps (91.7 vs. 65.1%) and the non-stacked/conjoined group more MS-TRAMs (34.2 vs. 6.9%, p = .000). Additionally, non-stacked/conjoined flaps had greater utilization of combined medial and lateral row perforators (p = .000). Mean flap weight was significantly higher than mastectomy weight in stacked/conjoined flaps (+110.7 g) when compared to non-stacked/conjoined flaps (−40.2) (p = .023).

Average follow-up was 54.7 ± 27.5 and 54.6 ± 29.3 months, respectively. Stacked/conjoined flaps had lower fat necrosis rates (8.3 vs. 25.4%, p = .039) and had a decreased risk of fat necrosis on multivariable regression analysis (OR 0.278, p = 0.045). There were otherwise no differences in flap, breast, or donor-site complications. Stacked/conjoined flaps also had a lower rate of contralateral breast reduction (p = .041).

Conclusion

Stacked/conjoined flaps were associated with a lower risk of fat necrosis compared with non-stacked/conjoined flaps and had a lower rate of contralateral symmetrizing reductions in patients undergoing unilateral abdominally-based breast reconstruction.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.