Volume 37, Issue 6 pp. 611-617
Research Article

The maxillary artery as a recipient vessel option for complex midface and anterior skull base microsurgical repair: A cadaveric study

Jed H. Assam

Jed H. Assam

Department of Biomedical Science, Creighton University, Omaha, NE

University of South Dakota Sanford School of Medicine, Sioux Falls, SD

Search for more papers by this author
Thomas H. Quinn

Thomas H. Quinn

Department of Biomedical Science, Creighton University, Omaha, NE

Search for more papers by this author
Oleg N. Militsakh

Corresponding Author

Oleg N. Militsakh

Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, Estabrook Cancer Center, Nebraska Methodist Health System, Omaha, NE

Correspondence Oleg Militsakh, MD, FACS, Associate Clinical Professor, Department of Surgery, Creighton University Medical Center, Director Head and Neck Reconstructive Program, Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, Methodist Estabrook Cancer Center, 8303 Dodge St, Suite 304, 402-354-5048, NE, USA Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
First published: 29 August 2016
Citations: 6

Abstract

Introduction

Variations in the operative situation for complex head and neck defect reconstructions resulting from mechanisms such as trauma, oncologic resection, and prior radiation exposure can result in situations of a vessel-depleted neck. This requires an awareness of alternate, innovative options for use in reconstructive repairs. The purpose of this study was to provide characterization of the third segment of the maxillary artery necessary to consider its use as a recipient vessel in free flap repair of complex midface defects.

Materials and Methods

Seventeen cadaver hemifaces were used for anatomic demonstration of the maxillary artery third segment by a transmaxillary approach to obtain descriptive measures for statistical analysis.

Results

The average artery intraluminal cross-section diameter was obtained for the sphenopalatine (1.39 ± 0.12 mm) descending palatine (0.94 ± 0.10 mm), and terminal maxillary (1.68 ± 0.17 mm) arterial vessels. The mean transmaxillary depth with was (43 ± 1.2 mm). Mean mobilizable lengths for sphenopalatine, descending palatine, and terminal maxillary arteries were (30 ± 2 mm), (29 ± 2 mm), and (20 ± 2 mm), accordingly. Vessel patterns were characterized using Morton and Kahn classification for sphenopalatine-descending palatine bifurcation as well as the Kwak classification for maxillary artery third segment morphology.

Conclusions

In situations where primary recipient vessel sites are unavailable, the maxillary artery represents an innovative option to be considered with suitable recipient artery characteristics.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.