Conflict of Interest Disclosures: All authors have completed and submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest and none were reported.

Read the full text

About

PDF

Tools

Share a link

Email
Wechat
Bluesky

Abstract

Background and Objective

Fractional CO₂ laser therapy has been used to improve scar pliability and appearance; however, a variety of treatment protocols have been utilized with varied outcomes. Understanding the relationship between laser power and extent of initial tissue ablation and time frame for remodeling could help determine an optimum power and frequency for laser treatment. The characteristics of initial injury caused by fractional CO₂ laser treatment, the rates of dermal remodeling and re-epithelialization, and the extent of inflammation as a function of laser stacking were assessed in this study in a porcine scar model.

Materials and Methods

Full-thickness burn wounds were created on female Red Duroc pigs followed by immediate excision of the eschar and split-thickness autografting. Three months after injury, the resultant scars were treated with a fractional CO₂ laser with 70 mJ of energy delivered as either a single pulse or stacked for three consecutive pulses. Immediately prior to laser treatment and at 1, 24, 96, and 168 hours post-laser treatment, transepidermal water loss (TEWL), erythema, and microscopic characteristics of laser injury were measured. In addition, markers for inflammatory cytokines, extracellular matrix proteins, and re-epithelialization were quantified at all time points using qRT-PCR.

Results

Both treatments produced erythema in the scar that peaked 24 hours after treatment then decreased to basal levels by 168 hours. TEWL increased after laser treatment and returned to normal levels between 24 and 96 hours later. Stacking of the pulses did not significantly increase the depth of ablated wells or extend the presence of erythema. Interleukin 6 and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 were found to increase significantly 1 hour after treatment but returned to baseline by 24 hours post laser. In contrast, expression of transforming growth factor β1 and transforming growth factor β3 increased slowly after treatment with a more modest increase than interleukin 6 and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1.

Conclusions

In the current study, the properties of the ablative zones were not directly proportional to the total amount of energy applied to the porcine scars with the use of triple stacking, resulting in only minor increases to microthermal zone (MTZ) depth and width versus a single pulse. Re-epithelialization and re-establishment of epidermal barrier function were observed in laser treated scars by 48 hours post therapy. Finally, many of the inflammatory genes up-regulated by the laser ablation returned to baseline within 1 week. As a whole, these results suggest that microthermal zones created by FXCO₂ treatment re-epithelialize rapidly with the inflammatory response to the laser induced injury largely resolved within 1 week post treatment. Further study is needed to understand the relationship between laser stacking and MTZ properties in human scars in order to evaluate the clinical applicability of the stacking technique. Lasers Surg. Med. 49:675–685, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

REFERENCES

1 Karen JK, Bernstein L, Geronemus RG. Successful treatment of atrophic postoperative and traumatic scarring with carbon dioxide ablative fractional resurfacing. Arch Dermatol Res 2016; 146(2): 133–140.
Google Scholar
2 Saluja R, Khoury J, Detwiler SP. Goldman MP. Histologic and clinical response to varying density settings with a fractionally scanned carbon dioxide laser. J Drugs Dermatol 2009; 8: 17–20.
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
3 Tiqwa P, Aviv T. Novel use of Erbium:YAG (2,940-nm) laser for fractional ablative photothermolysis in the treatment of photodamaged facial skin: A pilot study. Dermatologic Surg 2008; 34(8): 1048–1053.
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
4 Manuskiatti W, Triwongwaranat D, Varothai S, Eimpunth S, Wanitphakdeedecha R. Efficacy and safety of a carbon-dioxide ablative fractional resurfacing device for treatment of atrophic acne scars in Asians. J Am Acad Dermatol 2010; 63(2): 274–283.
10.1016/j.jaad.2009.08.051
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
5 Chapas AM, Brightman L, Sukal S, et al. Successful treatment of acneiform scarring with CO 2 ablative fractional resurfacing. Lasers Surg Med 2008; 386: 381–386.
10.1002/lsm.20659
Web of Science® Google Scholar
6 Waibel J, Beer K. Ablative fractional laser resurfacing for the treatment of a third-degree burn. J Drugs Dermatol 2009; 8(3): 294–297. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=19271380
PubMed Google Scholar
7 Waibel J, Beer K. Fractional laser resurfacing for thermal burns. J Drugs Dermatol 2008; 7: 59–61.
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
8 Ozog DM, Liu A, Chaffins ML, et al. Evaluation of clinical results, histological architecture, and collagen expression following treatment of mature burn scars with a fractional carbon dioxide laser. JAMA Dermatol 2013; 149(1): 50–57.
10.1001/2013.jamadermatol.668
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
9 Qu L, Liu A, Zhou L, et al. Clinical and molecular effects on mature burn scars after treatment with a fractional CO2 laser. Lasers Surg Med 2012; 44(7): 517–524.
10.1002/lsm.22055
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
10 Cho S Bin, Lee SJ, Chung WS, Kang JM, Kim YK. Treatment of burn scar using a carbon dioxide fractional laser. J Drugs Dermatol 2010; 9(2): 173–175.
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
11 Fife DJ, Fitzpatrick RE, Zachary CB. Complications of fractional CO2 laser resurfacing: Four cases. Lasers Surg Med 2009; 41(3): 179–184.
10.1002/lsm.20753
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
12 Avram MM, Tope WD, Yu T, Nelson JS. Hypertrophic scarring of the neck follwing ablative fractional carbon dioxide laser resurfacing. Hypertrophic 2009; 41(3): 185–188.
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
13 Haedersdal M. Fractional ablative Co2 laser resurfacing improves a thermal burn scar. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2009; 23(11): 1340–1341.
10.1111/j.1468-3083.2009.03215.x
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
14 Oni G, Robbins D, Bailey S, Brown SA, Kenkel JM. An in vivo histopathological comparison of single and double pulsed modes of a fractionated CO(2) laser. Lasers Surg Med 2012; 44: 4–10.
10.1002/lsm.21150
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
15 Hantash BM, Bedi VP, Kapadia B, et al. In vivo histological evaluation of a novel ablative fractional resurfacing device. Lasers Surg Med 2007; 39(2): 96–107.
10.1002/lsm.20468
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
16 Haak CS, Illes M, Paasch U, Hædersdal M. Histological evaluation of vertical laser channels from ablative fractional resurfacing: An Ex vivo pig skin model. Lasers Med Sci 2011; 26(4): 465–471.
10.1007/s10103-010-0829-2
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
17 Sasaki GH, Travis HM, Tucker B. Fractional CO2 laser resurfacing of photoaged facial and non-facial skin: Histologic and clinical results and side effects. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2009; 11(4): 190–201.
10.3109/14764170903356465
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
18 Tierney EP, Hanke CW, Petersen J. Ablative fractionated CO 2 laser treatment of photoaging: A clinical and histologic study. Dermatologic Surg 2012; 38(11): 1777–1789.
10.1111/j.1524-4725.2012.02572.x
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
19 Kwan JM, Wyatt M, Uebelhoer NS, Pyo J, Shumaker PR. Functional improvement after ablative fractional laser treatment of a scar contracture. PM R 2011; 3(10): 986–987.
10.1016/j.pmrj.2011.07.007
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
20 Reilly MJ, Cohen M, Hokugo A, Keller GS. Molecular effects of fractional carbon dioxide laser resurfacing on photodamaged human skin. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2010; 12(5): 321–325.
10.1001/archfaci.2010.38
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
21 Kim JY, Dunham DM, Supp DM, Sen CK, Powell HM. Novel burn device for rapid, reproducible burn wound generation. Burns 2016; 42(2): 384–391.
10.1016/j.burns.2015.08.027
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
22 Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods 2001; 25(4): 402–408.
10.1006/meth.2001.1262
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
23 Brugmans M, Kemper J, Gijsbers G, Gemert M. Temperature response of biological materials to pulsed non-Ablative CO2 laser irradiation. Lasers Surg Med 1991; 587–594.
10.1002/lsm.1900110614
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
24 Venugopalan V, Nishioka NS, Mikic BB. The effect of CO2 laser pulse repetition rate on tissue ablation rate and thermal damage. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1991; 38(10): 1049–1052.
10.1109/10.88452
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
25 Bailey SH, Brown SA, Kim Y, et al. An intra-individual quantitative assessment of acute laser injury patterns in facial versus abdominal skin. Lasers Surg Med 2011; 43(2): 99–107.
10.1002/lsm.21015
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
26 Bailey AJ, Bazin S, Sims TJ, Le Lous M, Nicoletis C, Delaunay A. Characterization of the collagen of human hypertrophic and normal scars. Biochim Biophys Acta 1975; 405(2): 412–421.
10.1016/0005-2795(75)90106-3
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
27 Verhaegen PDHM, Van Zuijlen PPM, Pennings NM, et al. Differences in collagen architecture between keloid, hypertrophic scar, normotrophic scar, and normal skin: An objective histopathological analysis. Wound Repair Regen 2009; 17(5): 649–656.
10.1111/j.1524-475X.2009.00533.x
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
28 Linares HA, Kirscher CW, Dobrkovky MD. The histiotypic organization of the hypertrophic scar in humans.pdf. J Invest Dermatol 1972; 59(4): 323–331.
10.1111/1523-1747.ep12627386
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
29 Van Zuijlen PPM, Ruurda JJB, Van Veen HA, et al. Collagen morphology in human skin and scar tissue: No adaptations in response to mechanical loading at joints. Burns 2003; 29(5): 423–431.
10.1016/S0305-4179(03)00052-4
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
30 Waibel JS, Wulkan AJ, Shumaker PR. Treatment of hypertrophic scars using laser and laser assisted corticosteroid delivery. Lasers Surg Med 2013; 45(3): 135–140.
10.1002/lsm.22120
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
31 Trelles MA, Leclère FM, Martínez-Carpio PA. Fractional carbon dioxide laser and acoustic-pressure ultrasound for transepidermal delivery of cosmeceuticals: A novel method of facial rejuvenation. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2013; 37(5): 965–972.
10.1007/s00266-013-0176-3
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
32 Cavali M, Sillard L, Montaudi H, Bahadoran P, Lacour JP, Passeron T. Treatment of keloids with laser-assisted topical steroid delivery: A retrospective study of 23 cases. Dermatol Ther 2015; 28(2): 74–78.
10.1111/dth.12187
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
33 Nguyen BT, Gan SD, Konnikov N, Liang CA. Treatment of superficial basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma in situ on the trunk and extremities with ablative fractional laser-Assisted delivery of topical fluorouracil. J Am Acad Dermatol 2015; 72(3): 558–560.
10.1016/j.jaad.2014.11.033
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
34 Braun SA, Schrumpf H, Buhren BA, Homey B, Gerber PA. Laser-assisted drug delivery: Mode of action and use in daily clinical practice. JDDG J der Dtsch Dermatologischen Gesellschaft 2016; 14(5): 480–488.
10.1111/ddg.12963_g
Web of Science® Google Scholar
35 Kositratna G, Evers M, Sajjadi A, Manstein D. Rapid fibrin plug formation within cutaneous ablative fractional CO2 laser lesions. Lasers Surg Med 2016; 48(2): 125–132.
10.1002/lsm.22412
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
36 Mahdavian B, Veer WM Van Der, Egmond M Van, Niessen FB, Beelen RHJ. Immunobiology Macrophages in skin injury and repair. Immunobiology 2011; 216: 753–762.
10.1016/j.imbio.2011.01.001
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
37 Lichtman MK, Otero-vinas M, Falanga V. Transforming growth factor beta (TGF- b) isoforms in wound healing and fibrosis. Wound Repair Regen 2016; 24: 215–222.
10.1111/wrr.12398
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar

Citing Literature

Volume49, Issue7

September 2017

Pages 675-685

Inflammatory responses, matrix remodeling, and re-epithelialization after fractional CO₂ laser treatment of scars

Abstract

Background and Objective

Materials and Methods

Results

Conclusions

REFERENCES

Citing Literature

References

Information

About Wiley Online Library

Help & Support

Opportunities

Connect with Wiley

Inflammatory responses, matrix remodeling, and re-epithelialization after fractional CO2 laser treatment of scars

Abstract

Background and Objective

Materials and Methods

Results

Conclusions

REFERENCES

Citing Literature

References

Related

Information

Inflammatory responses, matrix remodeling, and re-epithelialization after fractional CO₂ laser treatment of scars