Volume 39, Issue 1 pp. 59-66
Preclinical Reports
Free Access

Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy combined with conventional endodontic treatment to eliminate root canal biofilm infection

Aguinaldo S. Garcez DDS

Aguinaldo S. Garcez DDS

Center for Lasers and Applications, IPEN-CNEN/SP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author
Martha S. Ribeiro PhD

Martha S. Ribeiro PhD

Center for Lasers and Applications, IPEN-CNEN/SP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author
George P. Tegos PhD

George P. Tegos PhD

Wellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts

Department of Dermatology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

Search for more papers by this author
Silvia C. Núñez DDS

Silvia C. Núñez DDS

Center for Lasers and Applications, IPEN-CNEN/SP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author
Antonio O.C. Jorge PhD

Antonio O.C. Jorge PhD

School of Dentistry, Universidade de Taubaté, Taubaté, São Paulo, SP, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author
Michael R. Hamblin PhD

Corresponding Author

Michael R. Hamblin PhD

Wellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts

Department of Dermatology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts

BAR414, Wellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, 40 Blossom Street, Boston, MA 02114.Search for more papers by this author
First published: 25 October 2006
Citations: 178

Abstract

Background and Objective

To compare the effectiveness of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (PDT), standard endodontic treatment and the combined treatment to eliminate bacterial biofilms present in infected root canals.

Study Design/Materials and Methods

Ten single-rooted freshly extracted human teeth were inoculated with stable bioluminescent Gram-negative bacteria, Proteus mirabilis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa to form 3-day biofilms in prepared root canals. Bioluminescence imaging was used to serially quantify bacterial burdens. PDT employed a conjugate between polyethylenimine and chlorin(e6) as the photosensitizer (PS) and 660-nm diode laser light delivered into the root canal via a 200-µ fiber, and this was compared and combined with standard endodontic treatment using mechanical debridement and antiseptic irrigation.

Results

Endodontic therapy alone reduced bacterial bioluminescence by 90% while PDT alone reduced bioluminescence by 95%. The combination reduced bioluminescence by >98%, and importantly the bacterial regrowth observed 24 hours after treatment was much less for the combination (P<0.0005) than for either single treatment.

Conclusions

Bioluminescence imaging is an efficient way to monitor endodontic therapy. Antimicrobial PDT may have a role to play in optimized endodontic therapy. Lasers Surg. Med. © 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.