Volume 129, Issue 5 pp. 1197-1205
Otology/Neurotology

Changing trends in management of vestibular schwannoma: A National Cancer Database study

Bassel Bashjawish BA

Bassel Bashjawish BA

Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Newark, New Jersey

Search for more papers by this author
Suat Kılıç MD

Suat Kılıç MD

Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Newark, New Jersey

Search for more papers by this author
Soly Baredes MD, FACS

Soly Baredes MD, FACS

Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Newark, New Jersey

Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
Jean Anderson Eloy MD, FACS

Jean Anderson Eloy MD, FACS

Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Newark, New Jersey

Center for Skull Base and Pituitary Surgery, Neurological Institute of New Jersey, Newark, New Jersey

Department of Neurological Surgery, Newark, New Jersey

Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey

Search for more papers by this author
James K. Liu MD

James K. Liu MD

Department of Neurological Surgery, Newark, New Jersey

Search for more papers by this author
Yu-Lan Mary Ying MD

Corresponding Author

Yu-Lan Mary Ying MD

Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Newark, New Jersey

Send correspondence to Yu-Lan Mary Ying, MD, Assistant Professor, Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, 90 Bergen St, Suite 8100, Newark, NJ 07103. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
First published: 19 November 2018
Citations: 18

Presented at The Triological Society Annual Meeting in National Harbor, Maryland, U.S.A., on April 20, 2018.

The authors have no funding, financial relationships, or conflicts of interest to disclose.

Abstract

Objective

To describe changes in management trends of vestibular schwannoma (VS) and the effects of median income, education level, insurance status, and tumor size on receipt of treatment.

Methods

Cross-sectional analysis using the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2014. All patients with a diagnosis of VS were identified between 2004 and 2014. Trends in treatment modality over time were analyzed. Correlation between demographics, institution type, median income, education level, and insurance status were assessed using univariate and multivariate logistic regressions.

Results

Of the 22,290 VS patients identified, 16,011 (71.8%) received treatment, whereas 6,279 (28.2%) received observation. Management trend analysis over the 11-year period revealed patients with tumor size < 1 cm are more frequently observed (34.6% of cases in 2004 vs. 60.8% of cases in 2014) and less frequently received surgery (34.6% vs. 16.8%). Multivariate analysis showed observation was more frequently used in patients ≥ 65 years; black patients; and those on Medicaid, Medicare, and noninsured (P < 0.0001). All tumors > 2 cm were more likely to be treated with surgery, specifically subtotal resections (P < 0.0001). Patients treated at nonacademic centers were more likely to receive linear accelerator, or LINAC (Accuray Incorporated, Sunnyvale, CA) therapy than Gamma Knife (Elekta, Stockholm, Sweden) (P < 0.0001).

Conclusion

Management of VS is shifting toward increased observation, most significantly in tumors size < 1 cm. Insurance provider plays a significant role on receipt of treatment and modality, whereas income and education do not.

Level of Evidence

NA Laryngoscope, 129:1197–1205, 2019

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.