Volume 129, Issue 5 pp. 1155-1158
Laryngology

Subglottic stenosis: An evaluation of an elderly treatment-seeking population

Alissa M. Collins MD

Alissa M. Collins MD

Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
Kevin Chorath BS

Kevin Chorath BS

Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
C. Blake Simpson MD

Corresponding Author

C. Blake Simpson MD

Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, U.S.A.

Send correspondence to C. Blake Simpson, MD, MARC Building, 6th Floor-6B, 8300 Floyd Curl Drive, MC, San Antonio, TX 78229. E-mail: [email protected].Search for more papers by this author
First published: 08 November 2018
Citations: 4

Presented at the American Laryngological Association Meeting, Combined Otolaryngology Spring Meetings, National Harbor, Maryland, U.S.A, April 18–20, 2018.

The authors have no funding, financial relationships, or conflicts of interest to disclose.

Abstract

Objectives/Hypothesis

To evaluate the demographics, etiology, intraoperative findings, and treatment outcomes of patients with subglottic stenosis (SGS), comparing those patients aged <65 years to an elderly population aged ≥65 years.

Study Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Methods

Nine-year retrospective review of patients with SGS. Forty-eight adults presented for evaluation and treatment of SGS between January 2008 and December 2016. At the time of presentation, 41 were aged <65 years and seven were aged ≥65 years.

Results

Comparing the aged <65 years group to the aged ≥65 years group, the etiology was idiopathic SGS in 50.0% versus 42.8%, intubation-related SGS in 22.5% versus 28.6%, and granulomatosis with polyangiitis in 27.5% versus 28.6%, respectively. No statistically significant difference was noted in the two groups when comparing the demographics, etiology, treatment, intraoperative findings, or intertreatment interval (ITI).

Conclusions

We sought to analyze an older patient population with SGS and found no statistically significant differences compared to a younger population. ITI trended toward older patients requiring surgery more frequently but was not significant.

Level of Evidence

4 Laryngoscope, 129:1155–1158, 2019

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.