Volume 129, Issue 5 pp. 1081-1086
Facial Plastics and Reconstructive Surgery

Comparison of Modern Rigid Fixation Plating Outcomes for Segmental Mandibular Microvascular Reconstruction

Adam C. McCann BS

Adam C. McCann BS

Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, U.S.A

Search for more papers by this author
Yelizaveta Shnayder MD

Yelizaveta Shnayder MD

Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, U.S.A

Search for more papers by this author
Wojciech H. Przylecki MD

Wojciech H. Przylecki MD

Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, U.S.A

Search for more papers by this author
Kiran Kakarala MD

Kiran Kakarala MD

Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, U.S.A

Search for more papers by this author
Niaman Nazir MD, MPH

Niaman Nazir MD, MPH

Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, U.S.A

Search for more papers by this author
Douglas A. Girod MD

Douglas A. Girod MD

Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, U.S.A

Search for more papers by this author
Brian T. Andrews MD, MA

Corresponding Author

Brian T. Andrews MD, MA

Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, U.S.A

Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, U.S.A

Send correspondence to Brian T. Andrews, MD, Associate Professor, Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, MS 3015, Kansas City, MO 66160. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
First published: 03 October 2018
Citations: 10

Presented at the Triological Society Combined Sections Meeting, Scottsdale, Arizona, U.S.A., January 18–20, 2018.

The authors have no funding, financial relationships, or conflicts of interest to disclose.

Abstract

Objectives/Hypothesis

New advances in osseous microvascular mandibular rigid fixation are being employed at many institutions. These include standardized prebent/preformed reconstruction plates as well as computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) custom plates that are patient specific. Our goal was to assess and compare the outcomes of both of these new technologies when utilized for mandibular microvascular reconstruction.

Study Design

Retrospective chart review.

Methods

Subjects were categorized into two groups according to their mandibular rigid fixation technique: group 1 = prebent/preformed plates and group 2 = CAD/CAM custom plates. Primary outcome measures were 1) perioperative complications (defined as deep tissue infection, wound dehiscence resulting in bone exposure, and/or plate exposure) and 2) reoperation rates for mandibular hardware failure/explantation. Statistical analysis consisted of χ2, Fisher exact test, and multivariable regression models.

Results

A total of 142 subjects underwent microvascular mandibular reconstruction in a 6-year period. Eighty-nine subjects utilized prebent/preformed plates, and 53 employed CAD/CAM custom plates. Perioperative complications occurred in 32 of 89 (35.9%) subjects with prebent/preformed plates and 11 of 53 (20.7%) subjects using CAD/CAM custom plates. Reoperation requiring hardware explantation occurred in 18 of 89 (20.2%) subjects and three of 53 (5.6%) using CAD/CAM custom plates. Statistical comparison of perioperative complications between the two groups approached significance (P = .0556), and the rate of reoperation was significant favoring CAD/CAM implants (P = .0180).

Conclusions

In our experience, CAD/CAM custom plates utilized for rigid fixation during microvascular mandibular reconstruction demonstrated fewer complications and statistically lower reoperation rates when compared with prebent/preformed plates.

Level of Evidence

2c Laryngoscope, 129:1081–1086, 2019

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.