Volume 123, Issue 12 pp. 2962-2966
Allergy/Rhinology

18-FDG-PET in the initial staging of sinonasal malignancy

Vijay R. Ramakrishnan MD

Corresponding Author

Vijay R. Ramakrishnan MD

Department of Otorhinolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado

Send correspondence to Vijay R. Ramakrishnan, MD, Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Colorado, 12631 E. 17th Ave., B205, Aurora, CO 80045. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Jennifer Y. Lee MD

Jennifer Y. Lee MD

Department of Otorhinolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Search for more papers by this author
Bert W. O'Malley Jr. MD

Bert W. O'Malley Jr. MD

Department of Otorhinolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Search for more papers by this author
James N. Palmer MD

James N. Palmer MD

Department of Otorhinolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Search for more papers by this author
Alexander G. Chiu MD

Alexander G. Chiu MD

Department of Otorhinolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, U.S.A

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 23 July 2013
Citations: 19

The authors have no funding, financial relationships, or conflicts of interest to disclose.

Abstract

Objectives/Hypothesis

The utility of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (PET) has been gradually defined for most head and neck cancers, However, its utility in the initial diagnosis of sinonasal malignancy has not been extensively studied. The aim of this study was to determine if PET scanning accurately diagnoses and stages malignant sinonasal lesions and if maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) correlates with clinically advanced disease.

Study Design

Retrospective chart review.

Methods

There were 51 patients with sinonasal malignancy who underwent diagnostic whole body PET or PET-computed tomography scans that were analyzed for patient and disease characteristics, SUVmax, and staging.

Results

Of the 51 patients, 48 scans were positive at the primary site, with a sensitivity of 94%. Four patients were found to have intensely avid uptake, in which the numerical SUVmax was not documented, and three patients did not have any uptake in the region of their tumor. Mean SUVmax at the primary site was 16.1 (range, 3.1–59). Metastasis was detected in 31% (16/51) of the patients. There was a potential positive correlation between SUVmax at the primary site and detection of metastasis on univariate analysis (r = 0.19, P = .09), but on multivariate analysis, SUVmax was not found to correlate with T staging or metastasis.

Conclusions

For diagnosis of sinonasal malignancy, PET scans have a high sensitivity, although false negatives occurred in 6% of cases. PET scanning detected metastasis in 31% of patients, but SUVmax did not function as a marker for clinically advanced disease. The role of diagnostic PET for sinonasal malignancy is currently limited to cases with a high suspicion of metastatic disease.

Level of Evidence

NA Laryngoscope, 123:2962–2966, 2013

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.