Volume 124, Issue 2 pp. 504-509
Laryngology

Analysis of supraglottic activity during vocalization in healthy singers

Ross M. Mayerhoff MD

Ross M. Mayerhoff MD

Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
Marco Guzman SLP

Marco Guzman SLP

School of Communication Sciences, University of Chile and Voice Center, Las Condes Clinic, Santiago, Chile

Search for more papers by this author
Cristina Jackson-Menaldi PhD

Cristina Jackson-Menaldi PhD

Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, U.S.A.

Lakeshore Professional Voice Center, Lakeshore Ear, Nose, and Throat Center, St. Clair Shores, Michigan, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
Daniel Munoz MD

Daniel Munoz MD

Department of Network Management, Barros Luco-Trudeau Hospital, Santiago, Chile

Search for more papers by this author
Jayme Dowdall MD

Jayme Dowdall MD

Department of Otolaryngology, Harvard Medical School, and Department of Otology and Laryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
Ahmed Maki DO

Ahmed Maki DO

McLaren Oakland, Pontiac, and Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
Michael M. Johns III MD

Michael M. Johns III MD

Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, and Emory Voice Center, Atlanta, Georgia, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
Libby J. Smith DO

Libby J. Smith DO

Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
Adam D. Rubin MD

Corresponding Author

Adam D. Rubin MD

Lakeshore Professional Voice Center, Lakeshore Ear, Nose, and Throat Center, St. Clair Shores, Michigan, U.S.A.

Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan Medical Center,, Ann Arbor, Michigan, U.S.A.

Send correspondence to Adam Rubin, MD, 21000 E. Twelve Mile Road, Suite 111, St. Clair Shores, MI 48081. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
First published: 23 July 2013
Citations: 21

Presented at the Triological Society Combined Sections Meeting, Orlando, Florida, U.S.A., April 10–11, 2013.

The authors have no funding, financial relationships, or conflicts of interest to disclose.

Abstract

Objectives/Hypothesis

The present study aims to evaluate the degree of anterior–posterior and medial supraglottic laryngeal compression in healthy singers of different voice classifications while singing different pitches, loudness, and phonatory tasks.

Study Design

Prospective study.

Methods

Thirty-six classically trained singers (11 sopranos, 11 mezzo-sopranos, six tenors, and eight baritones) with at least 5 years of voice training and absence of any voice pathology within the past year were included. Flexible endoscopic voice evaluations were recorded and edited to include samples of different pitches, levels of loudness, and phonatory tasks. Sound was removed from the video samples. Two blinded laryngologists were asked to assess medial and anterior–posterior supraglottic compression using a visual analog scale for each sample.

Results

Medial compression was significantly greater in male subjects and specifically tenors during loud phonation, during high pitch, and while phonating the vowel /a/. Anterior–posterior compression was also significantly greater in males and specifically baritones during loud voice production and with phonation of the vowel /a/. No difference was noted in relation to pitch. Correlation between anterior–posterior and medial compression was demonstrated. Medial compression was less severe than anterior–posterior compression.

Conclusions

Supraglottic hyperfunction is present in healthy singers. Recognizing factors that might affect supraglottic hyperfunction in the healthy voice may help us to understand when hyperfunction is truly contributing to a patient's vocal pathology.

Level of Evidence

4. Laryngoscope, 124:504–509, 2014

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.