Volume 124, Issue 2 pp. 561-569
Pediatrics

We can predict postpalatoplasty velopharyngeal insufficiency in cleft palate patients

Jacques E. Leclerc MD

Corresponding Author

Jacques E. Leclerc MD

Quebec University Hospital Center (CHUQ), Quebec City, Quebec, Canada

Send correspondence to Jacques E. Leclerc, 2705 Boul. Laurier, Quebec, Qc. G1V 4G2 Canada. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Audrey Godbout MD

Audrey Godbout MD

Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Isabelle Arteau-Gauthier MD

Isabelle Arteau-Gauthier MD

Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Sophie Lacour MOA

Sophie Lacour MOA

Department of Speech–Language Pathology, Quebec University Hospital Center, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Kati Abel MOA

Kati Abel MOA

Department of Speech–Language Pathology, Quebec University Hospital Center, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Élisa-Maude McConnell MSc

Élisa-Maude McConnell MSc

Department of Speech–Language Pathology, Quebec University Hospital Center, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 20 May 2013
Citations: 33

The authors have no other funding, financial relationships, or conflicts of interest to disclose.

Financial support was obtained from Quebec University Hospital Center Foundation.

Abstract

Objectives/Hypothesis

To find an anatomical measurement of the cleft palate (or a calculated parameter) that predicts the occurrence of velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) after palatal cleft repair.

Study Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Methods

Charts were reviewed from cleft palate patients who underwent palatoplasty by the Von Langenbeck technique for isolated cleft palate or Bardach two-flap palatoplasty for cleft lip-palate. Seven anatomical cleft parameters were prospectively measured during the palatoplasty procedure. Three blinded speech–language pathologists retrospectively scored the clinically assessed VPI at 4 years of age. The recommendation of pharyngoplasty was also used as an indicator of VPI.

Results

From 1993 to 2008, 67 patients were enrolled in the study. The best predicting parameter was the ratio a/(30 − b1), in which a is defined as the posterior gap between the soft palate and the posterior pharyngeal wall and b1 is the width of the cleft at the hard palate level. An a/(30 − b1) ratio >0.7 to 0.8 is associated with a higher risk of developing VPI (relative risk = 2.2–5.1, sensitivity = 72%–81%, P < .03).

Conclusions

The width of the cleft at the hard palate level and the posterior gap between the soft palate and the posterior pharyngeal wall were found to be the most significant parameters in predicting VPI. The best correlation was obtained with the ratio a/(30 − b1).

Level of Evidence

4 Laryngoscope, 124:561–569, 2014

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.