Volume 42, Issue 12 pp. 2873-2881
Original Article

Role of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Evaluation of Cystic Renal Mass

Chandan J. Das MBBS, MD

Corresponding Author

Chandan J. Das MBBS, MD

Department of Radiodiagnosis and Interventional Radiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India

Address correspondence to Chandan J. Das, MBBS, MD, Department of Radiodiagnosis and Interventional Radiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Ansari Nagar, New Delhi 110029, India.

E-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Keshav Agarwal MBBS, MS

Keshav Agarwal MBBS, MS

Department of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India

Search for more papers by this author
Sanjay Sharma MBBS, MD

Sanjay Sharma MBBS, MD

Department of Radiodiagnosis, RP Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India

Search for more papers by this author
Amlesh Seth MBBS, MS, MCh

Amlesh Seth MBBS, MS, MCh

Department of Radiodiagnosis and Interventional Radiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 07 September 2023
Citations: 1

The study was funded by an intramural research grant from All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi (Code A-156).

Abstract

Objectives

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) allows excellent delineation of perfusion in septa and nodules without exposure to ionizing radiation or nephrotoxic contrast media. The aim of our study was to evaluate the role of CEUS for the assessment of cystic renal masses and compare its diagnostic performance with that of CECT.

Methods

Exactly 40 patients diagnosed to have cystic renal masses on CECT scan were prospectively evaluated with CEUS and were assigned a Bosniak class. Based on results of final histopathology and clinical follow-up, internal validity of both CEUS and CECT was evaluated, including agreement between these two modalities.

Results

Out of the 40 patients (mean size 3.1 ± 2.5 cm), 23 patients had benign lesions and 17 patients had malignant lesions. For CEUS, the sensitivity and negative predictive value was 100%, the specificity and positive predictive value was 73.9%. For CECT, the sensitivity and negative predictive value were 88.2 and 83.3%, respectively, whereas the specificity and positive predictive value was 87 and 90.9%, respectively. Both imaging modalities had similar accuracy with fair to good agreement with the final diagnosis (Κ = 0.71 and 0.75 for CEUS and CECT, respectively). Concordance between CEUS and CECT was seen in 29 patients (72.5%) with fair agreement between the two modalities (K = 0.66).

Conclusion

CEUS has comparable accuracy with CECT and could be used as screening modality to rule out the presence of complex cystic renal masses without exposure of nephrotoxic contrast media and ionizing radiation.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.