Volume 39, Issue 10 pp. 1917-1923
Original Research

Fetal Anomaly Detection in Pregnancies With Pregestational Diabetes

Robert B. Martin MD

Corresponding Author

Robert B. Martin MD

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA

Address correspondence to Robert B. Martin, MD, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390, USA. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Elaine L. Duryea MD

Elaine L. Duryea MD

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Donald D. Mcintire PhD

Donald D. Mcintire PhD

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Diane M. Twickler MD

Diane M. Twickler MD

Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Jodi S. Dashe MD

Jodi S. Dashe MD

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 23 April 2020
Citations: 1
Findings were presented at the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine Annual Convention; March 27, 2018; New York, New York. All of the authors of this article have reported no disclosures.

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate fetal anomaly detection in pregnancies with pregestational diabetes, according to the gestational age at the time of specialized sonography, use of follow-up sonography, maternal body mass index, and organ system(s) involved.

Methods

Women with pregestational diabetes who received prenatal care and delivered a live-born or stillborn neonate at our hospital from October 2011 through April 2017 were ascertained. We included all pregnancies with at least 1 confirmed structural anomaly (EUROCAT classification) who had detailed sonography at 18 weeks’ gestation or later. We analyzed detection of anomalous fetuses at the initial detailed sonogram and, if no abnormality was identified, during any follow-up sonograms. Statistical analyses were performed with the χ2 test and Mantel-Haenszel χ2 test for trend.

Results

Seventy-two anomalous neonates (72 of 1060 [6.8%]) were born. Overall detection was 55 of 72 (76%); 49 of 72 (68%) were detected at the initial detailed sonogram, compared to 6 of 15 (40%) of follow-up examinations (P = .04). Recognition at the initial or follow-up examination was not dependent on gestational age or body mass index category (all P > .05). Of individual organ system anomalies, 67 of 89 (75%) were identified. Detection exceeded 85% for central nervous system, genitourinary, and musculoskeletal abnormalities and 43% for craniofacial anomalies. Sixty-five percent of cardiac anomalies were detected, and 14 of 17 (82%) requiring specialized care in the immediate neonatal period were recognized.

Conclusions

Approximately three-fourths of anomalous fetuses were identified, with greater detection at the initial detailed examination. Fetuses with central nervous system, genitourinary, musculoskeletal abnormalities and those with cardiac anomalies requiring specialized cardiac care were more likely to come to attention.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.