Volume 20, Issue 4 pp. 449-465
Regular Article/Highlights of ISTSS 2006 Annual Meeting

Continuing controversy over the psychological risks of Vietnam for U.S. veterans

Bruce P. Dohrenwend

Corresponding Author

Bruce P. Dohrenwend

Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University; Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University; and New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY

Social Psychiatry Research Unit, Columbia University, 100 Haven Avenue, Tower 3-19E, New York, NY 10032Search for more papers by this author
J. Blake Turner

J. Blake Turner

Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, and New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY

Search for more papers by this author
Nicholas A. Turse

Nicholas A. Turse

Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY

Search for more papers by this author
Ben G. Adams

Ben G. Adams

Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY

Search for more papers by this author
Karestan C. Koenen

Karestan C. Koenen

Department of Society, Human Development, and Health; Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Harvard University; and Department of Psychiatry, Boston University, Boston, MA

Search for more papers by this author
Randall Marshall

Randall Marshall

Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University and New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 22 August 2007
Citations: 42

Abstract

In 1988, the National Vietnam Veterans Readjustment Study (NVVRS) reported 30.9% lifetime and 15.2% current rates of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and a strong dose/response relationship with retrospective reports of combat exposure. Skeptics argued that recall bias and other flaws inflated the results. Using a new record-based exposure measure and diagnoses in an NVVRS subsample, the authors addressed this controversy in a recent issue of Science (B. P. Dohrenwend et al., 2006). They found little evidence of falsification, an even stronger dose/response relationship and, when fully adjusted for impairment and evidence of exposure, 18.7% onset and 9.1% current rates of war-related PTSD. The fact that these rates are lower than the original NVVRS rates has stimulated continuing controversy that has tended to obscure the more important implications of the study's results.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.