Volume 60, Issue 4 pp. 221-226
Article
Full Access

Clinical significance of cathepsin D assay in breast cancer tissues

Yukashi Itoh MD

Yukashi Itoh MD

Second Department of Surgery, Nagoya City University Medical School, Nagoya, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Shunzo Kobayashi MD

Shunzo Kobayashi MD

Second Department of Surgery, Nagoya City University Medical School, Nagoya, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Hirotaka Iwase MD

Hirotaka Iwase MD

Second Department of Surgery, Nagoya City University Medical School, Nagoya, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Hiroko Yamashita MD

Hiroko Yamashita MD

Second Department of Surgery, Nagoya City University Medical School, Nagoya, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Tatsuya Kuzushima MD

Tatsuya Kuzushima MD

Second Department of Surgery, Nagoya City University Medical School, Nagoya, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Hiroji Iwata MD

Hiroji Iwata MD

Second Department of Surgery, Nagoya City University Medical School, Nagoya, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Toshinari Yamashita MD

Toshinari Yamashita MD

Second Department of Surgery, Nagoya City University Medical School, Nagoya, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Akihiro Naitoh MD

Akihiro Naitoh MD

Second Department of Surgery, Nagoya City University Medical School, Nagoya, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Dr. Kazuko Itoh MD

Corresponding Author

Dr. Kazuko Itoh MD

Second Department of Surgery, Nagoya City University Medical School, Nagoya, Japan

1, Kawasumi, Mizuhocho, Mizuho-ku, Aichi-ken, Nagoya 467 JapanSearch for more papers by this author
Akira Masaoka MD

Akira Masaoka MD

Second Department of Surgery, Nagoya City University Medical School, Nagoya, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
First published: December 1995
Citations: 4

Abstract

Cathepsin D was assayed in 74 primary breast cancer specimens by enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and immunohistochemical assay (ICA). Of the 74 specimens, 38 (51.4%) were scored positive by ICA, and 25 (33.8%) were scored positive by EIA. The coincidence rate between ICA and EIA was 71.6% (53/74). There was no significant correlation between cathepsin D and menopausal status, tumor size, number of metastatic lymph nodes, histologic type of the tumor, or steroid receptor status. Cathepsin D status designated by EIA or ICA predicted neither disease-free survival (DFS) nor overall survival (OAS). Subset analysis with estrogen receptor, menopausal, and lymph node status revealed no association between cathepsin D and survival. Univariate analysis revealed no association between cathepsin D and DFS or OAS. Therefore, cathepsin D is not an independent prognostic factor in breast cancer. © 1995 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.